Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biol Lett ; 10(10): 20140484, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25319817

ABSTRACT

Dental enamel is prone to damage by chipping with large hard objects at forces that depend on chip size and enamel toughness. Experiments on modern human teeth have suggested that some ante-mortem chips on fossil hominin enamel were produced by bite forces near physiological maxima. Here, we show that equivalent chips in sea otter enamel require even higher forces than human enamel. Increased fracture resistance correlates with more intense enamel prism decussation, often seen also in some fossil hominins. It is possible therefore that enamel chips in such hominins may have formed at even greater forces than currently envisaged.


Subject(s)
Dental Enamel/injuries , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Otters , Tooth Fractures , Animals , Bite Force , Hominidae , Tooth/anatomy & histology
2.
Biol Lett ; 6(6): 826-9, 2010 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20519197

ABSTRACT

Mammalian tooth enamel is often chipped, providing clear evidence for localized contacts with large hard food objects. Here, we apply a simple fracture equation to estimate peak bite forces directly from chip size. Many fossil hominins exhibit antemortem chips on their posterior teeth, indicating their use of high bite forces. The inference that these species must have consumed large hard foods such as seeds is supported by the occurrence of similar chips among known modern-day seed predators such as orangutans and peccaries. The existence of tooth chip signatures also provides a way of identifying the consumption of rarely eaten foods that dental microwear and isotopic analysis are unlikely to detect.


Subject(s)
Bite Force , Diet , Fossils , Hominidae/anatomy & histology , Hominidae/physiology , Animals , Humans , Mammals/anatomy & histology , Mammals/physiology , Seeds , Species Specificity , Tooth/anatomy & histology , Tooth/physiology
3.
Am J Phys Anthropol ; 140(4): 643-52, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19890850

ABSTRACT

A number of living primates feed part-year on seemingly hard food objects as a fallback. We ask here how hardness can be quantified and how this can help understand primate feeding ecology. We report a simple indentation methodology for quantifying hardness, elastic modulus, and toughness in the sense that materials scientists would define them. Suggested categories of fallback foods-nuts, seeds, and root vegetables-were tested, with accuracy checked on standard materials with known properties by the same means. Results were generally consistent, but the moduli of root vegetables were overestimated here. All these properties are important components of what fieldworkers mean by hardness and help understand how food properties influence primate behavior. Hardness sensu stricto determines whether foods leave permanent marks on tooth tissues when they are bitten on. The force at which a food plastically deforms can be estimated from hardness and modulus. When fallback foods are bilayered, consisting of a nutritious core protected by a hard outer coat, it is possible to predict their failure force from the toughness and modulus of the outer coat, and the modulus of the enclosed core. These forces can be high and bite forces may be maximized in fallback food consumption. Expanding the context, the same equation for the failure force for a bilayered solid can be applied to teeth. This analysis predicts that blunt cusps and thick enamel will indeed help to sustain the integrity of teeth against contacts with these foods up to high loads.


Subject(s)
Bite Force , Diet , Feeding Behavior , Materials Testing/methods , Primates/physiology , Animals , Elasticity , Hardness , Nuts/chemistry , Plant Tubers/chemistry , Seeds/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...