ABSTRACT
Paclitaxel (Taxol) is a diterpene plant product and antineoplastic agent that promotes the assembly of microtubules as well as stabilizing their formation by preventing depolymerization. Myelosuppression was found to be dose-limiting, but peripheral neurotoxicity is also a well known side-effect. Central nervous system toxicity is rare, probably because paclitaxel does not cross the blood-brain barrier. We observed three patients who presented with acute encephalopathy within 6 h after infusion of paclitaxel at normal doses. All patients had received prior whole brain irradiation (WBI) and one patient had prior brain metastasectomy. Computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed no evidence of cerebral metastases. An effect from other organ toxicities was excluded in all patients. All recovered spontaneously within 4-6 h. From this we can conclude that paclitaxel can cause severe acute transient encephalopathy, which may occur more frequently after prior WBI and/or surgery due to alteration of small vessel function.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Brain Diseases/chemically induced , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage , Brain Diseases/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
AIM: To study the effect of G-CSF therapy directly by MRI and 1H MRS in the lumbar and femoral bone marrow and differentiate between malignant bone marrow infiltration (MBMI) and reconversion of red marrow. METHODS: Thirteen patients could be examined twice, before and during G-CSF medication and another six only during treatment. T1 weighted spin-echo and opposed-phase gradient-echo images as well as the spectroscopic data (T2 values, water content) were analysed. RESULTS: After G-CSF a pathologic bone marrow signal intensity was seen in 8/13 (lumbar) and 11/13 (femoral) patients respectively. The majority of the signal alterations were diffuse (6 and 8), the minority focal (2 and 3). If a patient was successfully stimulated, a significant increase in water content occurred (21% lumbar, 34% femoral). T2 values did not change significantly, nor did they correlate with the stimulation success. CONCLUSIONS: MR tomography and -spectroscopy are suitable to detect lumbar and femoral bone marrow stimulation by G-CSF quantitatively and qualitatively. The changes may simulate MBMI. The adequate judgement of G-CSF treated bone marrow without pretherapeutic images is not possible.
