Global cardiovascular risk management in different Italian regions: an analysis of the Evaluation of Final Feasible Effect of Control Training and Ultra Sensitisation (EFFECTUS) educational program.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The Final Evaluation Feasible Effect of Ultra Control Training and Sensitization (EFFECTUS) is an educational program, aimed at improving global CV risk stratification and management in Italy. The present study evaluates differences on clinical approach to global CV risk among physicians involved in the EFFECTUS program and stratified in three geographical macro-areas (North, Center, South) of our Country. METHODS AND RESULTS: Physicians were asked to submit data already available in their medical records, covering the first 10 adult outpatients, consecutively seen in the month of May 2006. Overall, 1.078 physicians (27% females, aged 50 ± 7 years) collected data of 9.904 outpatients (46.5% females, aged 67 ± 9 years), among which 3.219 (32.5%) were residents in Northern, 3.652 (36.9%) in Central and 3.033 (30.6%) in Southern Italy. A significantly higher prevalence of major CV risk factors, including obesity, physical inactivity, hypertension and diabetes, was recorded in Southern than in other areas. Accordingly, Southern physicians more frequently prescribed antihypertensive, glucose and lipid lowering agents than other physicians, who paid significantly more attention to life-style changes in their clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of the EFFECTUS study demonstrates a high prevalence of CV risk factors in Italy, particularly in Southern areas, and indicates some important discrepancies in the clinical management of global CV risk among physcians working in different Italian regions.

Impact of physicians' age on the clinical management of global cardiovascular risk: analysis of the results of the Evaluation of Final Feasible Effect of Control Training and Ultra Sensitisation Educational Programme.

AIM: To evaluate the potential impact of physicians' age on global cardiovascular (CV) risk management in the population of the Evaluation of Final Feasible Effect of Ultra Control Training and Sensitisation (EFFECTUS) study. METHODS: Involved physicians were stratified into three age groups (≤ 45, 46-55 and > 55 years), and asked to provide clinical data covering the first 10 adult outpatients, consecutively seen in May 2006. RESULTS: Overall 1078 physicians, among whom 219 (20%) were aged ≤ 45, 658 (61%) between 46 and 55, and 201 (19%) > 55 years, collected data of 9904 outpatients (46.5% female patients, aged 67 ± 9 years), who were distributed into three corresponding groups: 2010 (20%), 6111 (62%) and 1783 (18%), respectively. A higher prevalence of myocardial infarction and stroke was recorded by younger physicians rather than those aged > 46 years. Older physicians frequently recommended life-style changes, whereas a higher number of antihypertensive, antiplatelet, glucose and lipid-lowering prescriptions was prescribed by physicians aged ≤ 45 years. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of the EFFECTUS study indicates a higher prevalence of vascular diseases among outpatients who were followed by younger physicians, who prescribed a higher number of CV drugs than older physicians. These older physicians have more attitude for prescribing favourable life-style changes than younger physicians.

Management of hypertension and stroke prevention: results of the Italian cardiologist survey.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of current habits, priorities, perceptions and knowledge of cardiologists with regard to hypertension and stroke prevention in outpatient practice. METHODS: A sample of 203 cardiologists operating in outpatient clinics and randomly selected amongst members of the largest Italian Outpatient Cardiologist Association were interviewed by e-mail, in April-May 2007. RESULTS: The interviewed cardiologists reported that hypertensive outpatients represent a large percentage of their practice population, in which the clinical priority was blood pressure (BP) reduction. Stroke was identified as the most important event to prevent and it was also perceived as the most preventable hypertension-related cardiovascular event. A remarkably high rate of achieved BP control was reported, to a degree that it is inconsistent with current epidemiological reports and with the relatively low percentage use of combination therapies declared by cardiologists. Additional risk factors, organ damage, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation were consistently reported in hypertensive patients. Among antihypertensive drug classes, a preference for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors has been expressed by the majority of physicians; this choice was generally justified by evidence derived from international trials or by the antihypertensive efficacy of this drug class. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the presence of weaknesses in the current services for patients with hypertension, even when being managed by cardiologists. Discrepancies between perceptions and reality, or clinical practice and guideline recommendations are also highlighted. An analysis of these aspects may help to identify current areas of potential improvement for stroke prevention in the clinical management of hypertension in cardiology practice.