Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 61(2): 258-265, 2019 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31301661

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurode-generative disease, usually detected by its motor symptoms. The non-motor symptoms, including cognitive deficits, have been of great interest to researchers in the last few decades. AIM: To assess the effect of pramipexole on learning and memory in naïve and haloperidol-challenged rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Wistar rats divided into 9 groups (n=8): naïve - saline, pramipexole 0.5; 1 and 3 mg/kg bw; Haloperidol groups - saline, haloperidol, haloperidol + pramipexole 0.5; 1 and 3 mg/kg bw. Two-way active avoidance test (TWAA) and activity cage were performed. The studied parameters were: number of conditioned and unconditioned responses, vertical and horizontal movements. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 19. RESULTS: The naïve experimental groups significantly increased the number of conditioned responses during the tests for short- and long-term memory, compared with the saline groups (p<0.05). During the short-memory test only the animals with the lowest dose of PMX significantly increased the number of unconditioned responses whereas during the long-term memory test all experimental groups increased the number of escapes in comparison with the saline groups (p<0.05). Challenge dose of haloperidol attenuates learning and memory in pramipexol treated rats. Only the highest dose of pramipexol showed significant increase in conditioned and unconditioned responses compared with the haloperidol group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Pramipexole improves learning and memory in naïve rats by enhancing dopaminergic neurotransmission. This is probably not the only mechanism involved. This is confirmed by the decrease in learning and memory ability in rats with haloperidol-challenge.


Subject(s)
Avoidance Learning/drug effects , Dopamine Agonists/pharmacology , Memory/drug effects , Pramipexole/pharmacology , Animals , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Dopamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Haloperidol/pharmacology , Learning/drug effects , Locomotion/drug effects , Male , Rats , Rats, Wistar
2.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 60(3): 433-438, 2018 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30355833

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants have been found to possess antinociceptive and analgesic properties and are prescribed in the treatment of chronic pain. AIM: To evaluate the antinociceptive properties of escitalopram after a single administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty Wistar rats were used in the study. They were divided into 5 groups (n=8) treated with saline solution (control group), metamizole (150 mg/kg b.w.), escitalopram (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg b.w.) intraperitoneally. The nociceptive tests we used employed thermal (hot plate and plantar test), mechanical (analgesimeter) and chemical (formalin test) stimuli. Criteria for analgesic effect were increased latency in hot plate, plantar test, analgesimeter and decreased paw licking time in formalin test. RESULTS: The reference analgesic metamizole showed significant analgesic effect in all tests excluding the first phase with formalin. Escitalopram in doses of 5 and 20 mg/kg b.w. increased paw withdrawal latency in analgesimeter at 2 hours compared to control. Escitalopram in a dose of 5 mg/kg b.w. increased the duration of the stay on the hot plate at 1 hour, while doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg b.w. significantly increased this indicator at 1 and 3 hours in comparison to the saline treated group. In the plantar test, escitalopram in all used doses significantly increased the nociceptive response latency compared to control. A dose of 5 mg/kg b.w. decreased hind paw licking time during phase 1 of the formalin test, whereas doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg b.w. decreased phase 2 licking time compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The antidepressant escitalopram has analgesic properties but they are not dose- or time-dependent.


Subject(s)
Citalopram/pharmacology , Nociception/drug effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Analgesics/pharmacology , Animals , Dipyrone/pharmacology , Hot Temperature , Male , Pain Measurement , Physical Stimulation , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Wistar
3.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 60(1): 110-116, 2018 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29668446

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic stress is one of the main factors which lead to depression - a psychiatric disorder affecting millions of people and predicted to be the second ranked cause of premature death in 2020. Depression is often associated with cognitive disturbances and memory deficit. Plant based therapy could be effective in the treatment of mild to moderate depression due to its low level of adverse reaction, its good tolerability and compliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 72 male Wistar rats, divided in 9 groups were given orally for 8 weeks two combinations of dry plant extracts - Antistress I and Antistress II and five individual dry extracts obtained from Serratula coronata, Hypericum perforatum, Valeriana officinalis, Crataegus monogyna and Melissa officinalis. The animals were exposed to a chronic unpredictable mild stress for 8 weeks. The depression-like symptoms were evaluated with Forced swim test while the assessment of the memory deficit was performed with Novel object recognition test. RESULTS: Antistress II demonstrates antidepressant effect while Antistress I doesn't improve the depressive-like symptoms. The individual extracts of Hypericum perforatum and Valeriana officinalis also possess antidepressant properties. Antistress II improves the cognition as well as the individual extracts of Hypericum perforatum, Valeriana officinalis and especially Serratula coronata. Dry extract from Serratula tend to have the best effect regarding the recognition memory. The effect of Antistress I on memory deficit is negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Antistress II possesses antidepressant effect and improves the recognition memory while Antistress I doesn't demonstrate any of the above-described effects.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Memory/drug effects , Plant Extracts , Stress, Psychological , Animals , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Chronic Disease , Depression/drug therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Male , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Stress, Psychological/drug therapy , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...