ABSTRACT
Background: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) is overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). However, the prognosis of high expression of HIF-1α in PDACs remains controversial because of lacking a solid support. A meta-analysis may help for a better understanding of the role of HIF-1α in the prognosis of PDACs. Methods: By using a systematic approach, we conducted a meta-analysis from current literature. We performed an advanced search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. Recorded studies were published between September 1, 2001, and February 26, 2021, in English and related to the expression of HIF-1α in PDAC. We pooled and combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to show the effect of HIF-1α expression on overall survival (OS). We pooled also risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs to assess the correlation between HIF-1α expression and clinicopathological characteristics in PDAC. We evaluated publication bias among included studies through the Begg's test and Egger's test. From "Expression Plots" modules in the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) database, we showed the difference of mRNA level for HIF1A between 179 pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PAADs) and 171 normal pancreatic tissues. Results: This meta-analysis included 11 studies and 764 patients. High expression of HIF-1α was associated with shorter OS compared to low HIF-1α expression in PDAC (HR =1.74, 95% CI: 1.49-2.04, P<0.001). Patients with high expression of HIF-1α tended to have an increased risk of earlier lymph node metastasis (LNM) (RR =1.63, 95% CI: 1.36-1.95, P<0.001), and more advanced clinical stage (RR =1.64, 95% CI: 1.38-1.97, P<0.001) compared to those with low HIF-1α expression. Expression plots from GEPIA database showed HIF1A overexpressed in PDAC tissues compared to normal tissues (Log2FC =2, P<0.01). Conclusions: High HIF-1α expression associated with worse prognosis of PDACs compared to low HIF-1α expression. Since HIF-1α expression is greater in PDAC than normal pancreas, it could serve as a prognostic factor and potential therapeutic target. However, due to the complex role of HIF-1α in physiology and pathology, therapeutic intervention should be considered with caution.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: AKR1C3, as a crucial androgenic enzyme, implicates the androgen biosynthesis and promoting prostate cancer cell growth in vitro. This study provides a new gene therapy strategy for targeting AKR1C3 to treat castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods: siAKR1C3@PPA is assembled from PEG3500, PAMAM, Aptamer-PSMA, and siRNA for AKR1C3. We analyzed the relationship between AKR1C3 expression and the survival rate of prostate cancer patients based on the GEPIA online database to perform disease-free survival, and found that AKR1C3 may be an important factor leading to poor prognosis in prostate cancer. Considering AKR1C3 as a therapeutic target for castration-resistant prostate cancer, we constructed a complex nucleic acid nanoparticle, siAKR1C3@PPA to investigate the inhibitory effect on castration-resistant prostate cancer. Results: Aptamer-PSMA acts as a target to guide siAKR1C3@PPA into PSMA-positive prostate cancer cells and specifically down regulate AKR1C3. Cyclin D1 was decreased as a result of siAKR1C3@PPA treatment. Changes in Cyclin D1 were consistent with decreased expression of AKR1C3 in LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells and 22RV1 cells. Furthermore, in the LNCaP-AKR1C3 group, 1070 proteins were upregulated and 1015 proteins were downregulated compared to the LNCaP group according to quantitative 4D label-free proteomics. We found 42 proteins involved in cell cycle regulation. In a validated experiment, we demonstrated that PCNP and CINP were up-regulated, and TERF2 and TP53 were down-regulated by western blotting. Conclusion: We concluded that siAKR1C3@PPA may arrest the cell cycle and affect cell proliferation.
