ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The management of pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer is controversial and no data about the efficacy of trastuzumab in this setting are available from randomized clinical trials. The aims of this retrospective study were to assess how patients are managed in clinical practice in Italy, which clinical or biological characteristics influenced the choice of adjuvant systemic therapy and the outcome of patients. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients who underwent surgery from January 2007 to December 2012 for HER2-positive, pT1a-b pN0 M0 breast cancer were retrospectively collected from 28 Italian centres. Analysis of contingency tables and multivariate generalized logit models were used to investigate the association between the baseline clinical and biological features and the treatment strategy adopted. RESULTS: Among 303 enrolled patients, 204 received adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab, 65 adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab and 34 did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy. At the multivariate analysis age, tumor size, proliferation index and hormone receptor status were significantly associated with the treatment choice. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) probability was 95%, 94.3% and 69.6% for patients treated with adjuvant systemic therapy and trastuzumab, with adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab and for patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients (66%) with pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer enrolled in this retrospective study received adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab, whereas only 11% patients did not receive any adjuvant systemic therapy. It should be emphasized, however, that in the adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab group 94% of tumors were hormone receptor positive and 89% of patients were treated with endocrine therapy only [corrected]. The 5-year DFS probability was significantly higher for patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab compared with patients not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy or receiving adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/therapeutic use , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease Management , Female , Gene Expression , Humans , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Prognosis , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Tumor BurdenABSTRACT
Several trials comparing the efficacy of standard melphalan and prednisone (MP) therapy with MP plus thalidomide (MPT) in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have been reported, with inconsistent results. The primary goal of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of MP versus MPT in newly diagnosed patients with MM who were transplant-ineligible or over age 65. A total of 135 patients were enrolled. Either minimal response or better or partial response or better were more frequent with MPT treatment (pâ=â0.001). After a median follow-up of 30 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 33 and 52 months for MPT versus 22 and 32 months for MP, respectively. The comparison showed a significant advantage for MPT versus MP in PFS (pâ=â0.02) and only a trend for OS (pâ=â0.07). Severe adverse events were observed more frequently with MPT. In conclusion, our results show an improved activity of MPT at a cost of increased toxicity. We believe that MPT can be considered one of the new standard of care for elderly or transplant-ineligible patients with MM.
