Training individuals to implement discrete-trial teaching procedures using behavioral skills training: A scoping review with implications for practice and research.

Behavioral skills training (BST) is an evidence-based approach for training individuals to implement discrete-trial teaching procedures. Despite the effectiveness of this approach, implementing BST can be time and resource intensive, which may interfere with a clinical organization's adoption of this training format. We conducted a scoping review of studies using BST components for training discrete-trial teaching procedures in peer-reviewed articles between 1977 and 2021. We identified 51 studies in 46 publications involving 354 participants. We coded descriptive data on (a) participant characteristics, (b) study characteristics, (c) training conditions (including instructions, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback), and (d) training outcomes. The results indicated that studies have primarily attempted to improve the efficacy and efficiency of BST by modifying or omitting common training components. We provide best-practice considerations for using BST to teach discrete-trial teaching procedures and offer a research agenda to guide future investigation in this area.

Factors associated with a positive phosphatidylethanol test during liver transplantation evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of alcohol use is crucial for informing recommendations of appropriate follow-up treatment pre-liver transplant and optimizing post-liver transplant outcomes. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether there are psychosocial factors associated with a positive PEth test. METHODS: All patients who underwent a routine pre-surgical psychological evaluation for liver transplant listing (all etiologies, including acute liver failure, dual organ, and re-transplantation) at a single health care system in 2020 were included in a retrospective chart review. Data extraction included results from PEth testing and information from the psychological evaluation (i.e., demographic, psychiatric symptoms, and cognitive functioning). RESULTS: There were 158 patients (73.8%) who had a PEth test, of whom 21.5% had a positive result (n = 34). Younger age was associated with a positive PEth (p < .001). ALD status and type of ALD (hepatitis vs. cirrhosis) were also associated with a positive PEth test. Other demographic characteristics and psychiatric symptoms were not associated with a positive PEth result (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Younger age was the only significant demographic variable associated with a positive PEth test. Given the difficulty of predicting who may be using alcohol, it may be useful to use PEth testing for all patients during the pre-liver transplant evaluation and while patients are listed for liver transplant. Early identification of alcohol use through routine PEth testing will help identify patients who are using alcohol and need further treatment for alcohol use to optimize health and post-transplant outcomes.

Utility of phosphatidylethanol testing as an objective measure of alcohol use during the preoperative evaluation for bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: The risk of alcohol use disorder increases after bariatric surgery. Preoperative alcohol use is a risk factor, and this is evaluated during the routine preoperative psychosocial evaluation. However, it is not clear whether patients accurately report their alcohol use. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an objective measure of alcohol use, phosphatidylethanol (PEth) testing, offers utility beyond self-reported alcohol use during the preoperative evaluation for bariatric surgery. SETTING: Single healthcare system. METHODS: PEth testing was included as part of the routine laboratory work for 139 patients undergoing evaluation for bariatric surgery. PEth testing results were compared with self-reported alcohol use and scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise (AUDIT-C) questionnaire obtained during the preoperative psychosocial evaluation. PEth testing results were categorized into abstinent, light use, moderate use, or heavy use. There were 85 patients who completed both PEth testing and a preoperative psychosocial evaluation. RESULTS: There were 25 participants (29.4%) who had a positive PEth test; about half had moderate or heavy use values (15.3% of the total sample). The majority of participants with a positive PEth test (82.6%) denied recent alcohol use. Of those with PEth values indicating moderate or heavy use, 61.5% did not have an elevated AUDIT-C score. CONCLUSIONS: Patients appeared to underreport their alcohol use during the preoperative psychosocial evaluation. There appears to be utility for routine PEth testing as part of the evaluation process to identify those with risky drinking patterns. Patients with preoperative risky drinking could be educated about their risk and/or referred to programs to mitigate the development of preoperative alcohol misuse.