Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Injury ; 48(10): 2248-2252, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28712488

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Two-stage limb reconstruction is an option for patients with critical size segmental bone defects following acute trauma or non-union. Reconstruction is technically demanding and associated with a high complication rate. Current protocols for limb reconstruction have well-documented challenges, and no study has reported on patient outcomes using a validated questionnaire. In this study, we aimed to examine the clinical and patient-centered outcomes following our surgical protocol for two-stage limb reconstruction following critical size segmental defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single surgeon performed reconstruction of long bone defects using antibiotic impregnated cement spacers and intramedullary cancellous bone autograft. A retrospective chart review was performed. Three reviewers independently measured time to union based on radiographs. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) survey was administered to patients after most recent follow-up. RESULTS: Ten limbs representing nine patients were included. All patients sustained a lower extremity injury, and one patient had bilateral lower extremity injuries. Average clinical follow-up was 18.3 months (range 7-33) from final surgical intervention, and follow-up to questionnaire administration was 28 months (range 24-37). The mean time between stages was 3.1 months. Average time to unrestricted weight-bearing was 7.9 months from Stage 1 (range 3.4-15.9) and 4.5 months from Stage 2 (range 1.1-11.6). Average time to full union was 16.7 months from Stage 1 (range 6.4-28.6) and 13.5 months from Stage 2 (range 1.8-27). Eight patients (nine limbs) participated in the LEFS survey, the average score was 53.1 (range 30-67), equating to 66% of full functionality (range 38%-84%). Complications included 5 infections, 3 non-unions, and one amputation. There was a moderate positive correlation between infection at any time point and non-union (R=0.65, p=0.03). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in this small patient cohort were good despite risks of complication. There is an association between infection and non-union. Further studies addressing clinical and functional outcomes will help to guide expectations for future surgeons and patients.


Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation , Diaphyses/surgery , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fractures, Comminuted/surgery , Fractures, Ununited/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bone Cements , Clinical Protocols , Combined Modality Therapy , Diaphyses/pathology , Female , Femoral Fractures/complications , Femoral Fractures/physiopathology , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Healing , Fractures, Comminuted/complications , Fractures, Comminuted/physiopathology , Fractures, Ununited/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Tibial Fractures/complications , Tibial Fractures/physiopathology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...