Excess of cesarean births in pregnant women with COVID-19: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that cesarean birth in pregnant women with COVID-19 may decrease maternal adverse events and perinatal transmission. This systematic review aimed to evaluate variations in clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and maternal/neonatal outcomes in COVID-19 patients who delivered vaginally versus via cesarean. METHODS: A comprehensive search following PRISMA guidelines was performed for studies published up to May 23, 2020, using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Science Direct, and clinicaltrials.gov. Original retrospective and prospective studies, case reports, or case series with sufficient data for estimating the association of COVID-19 with different pregnancy outcomes with no language restriction and published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Pooled mean and arcsine transformation proportions were applied. Next, a two-arm meta-analysis was performed comparing the perinatal outcomes between the study groups. RESULTS: Forty-two studies with a total of 602 pregnant women with COVID-19 were included. The mean age was 31.8 years. Subgroup analysis showed that Americans had the lowest gestational age (mean = 32.7, 95%CI = 27.0-38.4, P < 0.001) and the highest incidence of maternal ICU admission (95%CI = 0.45%-2.20, P < 0.001) of all nationalities in the study. There was no significant difference in perinatal complications, premature rupture of membrane, placenta previa/accreta, or gestational hypertension/pre-eclampsia between women who delivered vaginally versus by cesarean. Importantly, there were also no significant differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Vaginal delivery was not associated with worse maternal or neonatal outcomes when compared with cesarean. The decision to pursue a cesarean birth should be based on standard indications, not COVID-19 status.

Deciphering excess healthcare burden in head and neck cancer patients with cardiovascular comorbidity.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the perioperative surgical outcomes for head and neck cancer patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2010 and 2014. Logistic regression analysis by enter and backward stepwise methods were used. RESULTS: A total of 8346 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with concomitant CVD had a higher frequency of complications (57.6%) compared with those without (47.4%) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-1.48, p < 0.001). Patients with CVD comorbidities were prone to experience in-patient mortality at both admission (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.42-4.05) and readmission (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.10-5.87). CVD patients have prolonged hospital admission (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02-1.27, p = 0.020) and higher cost (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.15-1.43, p < 0.001). Patients with congestive heart failure were prone to 30 days readmission (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.10-2.53, p = 0.019) and 90 days (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.14-2.39, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: This is the first study identifying factors predicting higher risk of perioperative complications of surgical management of head and neck cancer. Those with CVD had higher risk of adverse events.

Effects of Parathyroidectomy on Normocalcemic Primary Hyperparathyroidism and the Role of Intraoperative PTH Measurement.

BACKGROUND: Normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NCpHPT) and normohormonal primary hyperparathyroidism (NHpHPT) are recently recognized variants of primary hyperparathyroidism. Current guidelines for the management hyperparathyroidism recognize NCpHPT as one of the areas that are recommended for more research due to limited available data. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who had parathyroidectomy between 2014 and 2019. We excluded patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes and secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Included patients were classified based on the biochemical profile into classic or normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism group. Collected data included demographics, preoperative localizing imaging, intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels, and postoperative cure rates. RESULTS: 261 patients were included: 160 patients in the classic and 101 patients in the normocalcemic group. Patients in the normocalcemic group had significantly more negative sestamibi scans (n = 58 [8.2%] vs 78 [51.3%], P = <.01), smaller parathyroid glands (mean weight 436.0 ± 593.0 vs 742.4 ± 1109.0 mg, P = .02), higher parathyroid hyperplasia rates (n = 51 [50.5%] vs 69 [43.1%]), and significantly higher intraoperative parathyroid hormone at 10 minutes (78.1 ± 194.6 vs 43.9 ± 62.4 1, P = .04). Positive predictive value of both intraoperative parathyroid hormone and cure rate was lower in the normocalcemic group (84.2% vs 95.7%) and (80.5% vs 95%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism is a challenging disease. Surgeons should be aware of the lower cure rate in this group, interpret intraoperative parathyroid hormone with caution, and have a lower threshold for bilateral neck exploration and 4 glands visualization.

COVID-19 and liver dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies.

Recently, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is the most significant global health crisis. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to find the association between liver injuries and the severity of COVID-19 disease. Online databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science direct, were searched to detect relevant publications up to 16 April 2020. Depending on the heterogeneity between studies, a fixed- or random-effects model was applied to pool data. Publication bias Egger's test was also performed. Meta-analysis of 20 retrospective studies (3428 patients), identified that patients with a severe manifestation of COVID-19 exhibited significantly higher levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and bilirubin values with prolonged prothrombin time. Furthermore, lower albumin level was associated with a severe presentation of COVID-19. Liver dysfunction was associated with a severe outcome of COVID-19 disease. Close monitoring of the occurrence of liver dysfunction is beneficial in early warning of unfavorable outcomes.