ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Third line innovative systemic treatments and loco-regional chemotherapy by hypoxic pelvic perfusion (HPP) have both been proposed for the treatment of unresectable not responsive recurrent rectal cancer (URRC). In the present study, we have compared the safety and efficacy of HPP/target therapy, using drug regimens selected by liquid biopsy precision oncotherapy, to third-line systemic therapy based on tissue specimens precision oncotherapy. METHODS: HPP/target therapy regimens were selected based on precision oncotherapy, including assays for chemosensitivity and viability, and qRT-PCR for tumor-related gene expression. In the control group, systemic third-line and further lines of therapy were defined according to clinical and biological parameters. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2019, 62 URRC patients were enrolled, comprised of 43 patients in the HPP/target-therapy group and 19 patients in the systemic therapy control group. No HPP related complications were reported and the most common adverse events were skin and bone marrow toxicity. In the HPP/target-therapy group, the ORR was 41.8% whereas in the systemic therapy control group was 15.8%. DCR of the HPP/target-therapy group was significantly improved over the systemic therapy group (P = 0.001), associated with a PFS of 8 vs 4 months (P = 0.009), and OS of 20 vs 8 months (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate that in URCC patients, the integration of HPP/target-therapy and precision oncotherapy based upon liquid biopsy is as effective and efficacious as third-line treatment in local disease control and, therefore, deserves to be further assessed and compared to conventional systemic treatments in future prospective randomized trials.
Subject(s)
Liquid Biopsy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Precision Medicine/methods , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the relative importance of isolated thoracic perfusion (ITP) in the multidisciplinary palliative treatment of progressive malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients. METHODS: Fifty-two MPM patients with progressive disease after systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed were submitted to 112 ITP using mitomycin C (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) between 2000 and 2017. Isolation of the chest was achieved by insertion of stop-flow balloon catheters via femoral or iliac access. Primary endpoints were adverse events, tumor response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initial ITP. RESULTS: Median interval-time from MPM diagnosis was 9 months. There were no perfusion-related postoperative deaths. The main procedure-related complication was persistent leakage of lymphatic fluid from the incision in less than 10% of ITP. No severe perfusion-related toxicity was reported, with grade 3 haematological toxicity and platinum-induced neurotoxicity in less than 8% of the patients. Following initial ITP, overall tumor response rate was 25%, median PFS was 7 months (IQR 5-10.5), and median OS was 16 months (IQR 12.5-21). After the last ITP, 14 patients received further therapies, including targeted therapy with cetuximab or bevacizumab. Non-epithelioid histology, stage III, and ECOG performance status 3 pre-ITP were prognostic factors with a significant influence on OS. Median OS, calculated from the diagnosis of MPM, was 26.5 months (IQR 22.5-28). CONCLUSIONS: ITP is safe, tolerable, and useful but its inclusion in the multidisciplinary palliative treatment of progressive MPM patients should be investigated in a larger multicentre controlled study.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mesothelioma/drug therapy , Pleural Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Mesothelioma/mortality , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Middle Aged , Palliative Care , Retrospective Studies , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
The median overall survival of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients is still approximately 2 years. This is even lower in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with concomitant lung metastases. These patients are often not suitable for surgery and not responsive to systemic chemotherapy. Isolated thoracic perfusion (ITP) followed by chemofiltration has been used for palliation in selected specialised centres. A retrospective observational study evaluating 162 MBC patients who underwent 407 ITP procedures was performed. The primary objective was the evaluation of the feasibility, safety, tolerability and efficacy of ITP in the complete cohort of 162 patients with LM from breast cancer. The secondary objective of the study was the evaluation of responses and median survivals in 43 TNBC patients with LM. In the 162 patients, ITP appeared safe and well tolerated with MST from LM diagnosis to death or last contact of 19.5 months. In the subgroup of patients treated with systemic chemotherapy followed by ITP at progression, the MST from LM diagnosis to death or last contact was 29 months. In the subgroup of TNBC patients treated with systemic chemotherapy followed by ITP at progression, the MST from LM diagnosis to death or last contact was 19 months (ITP overall response rate was 65.52%). ITP followed by chemofiltration could be adopted in the sequential palliation treatments of BC patients with LM in progression after systemic chemotherapy, especially with TNBC. The present data allow interesting considerations about tolerability and responses, but do not allow robust conclusions about survival.
