[Prognostic value of early treatment response in children with acute myeloid leukemia].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of early treatment response in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: Sixty-one children with AML, 37 male and 24 female, aged 96 months (6 - 154 months), underwent treatment according to the protocol AML-XH-99 with a total treatment course of 15 months and were followed up for 12 months (1 - 74 months). Bone marrow smear was made 48 hours after the end of the first course of induction treatment. Then the children were divided into 2 groups according to the number of bone marrow blast cells: group with the number of blast cells > or = 0.15 and group with the number of blast cells < 0.15. Second bone marrow smear was made when complete remission was achieved after the end of the treatment course. Then the children were divided into 2 groups according to the number of bone marrow blast cells: group with the number of blast cells of 0.00 and group with the number of blast cells between 0.00 and 0.05. The probability of event-free survival (EFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank test was used to compare the 5-year EFS (pEFS) of different groups. The differences in the biological features were compared by Chi-square analysis or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: The pEFS of the group with the number of blast cells > or = 0.15 was 18% +/- 15%, significantly shorter than that of the group with the number of blast cells < 0.15 (49% +/- 11%, P = 0.079). The 3 patients without morphologically identifiable blast all survived 5 years after complete remission had been achieved, and the pEFS of the 39 patients with the number of blast cells between 0.00 and 0.05 was 53% +/- 10%. The pEFS of the patients among which complete remission was achieved after the first course of treatment (n = 39) was 54% +/- 10%, significantly higher than that of the patients without complete remission after the first course of treatment (10% +/- 9%, P = 0.0002). Multiple factor analysis showed that achievement of complete remission after the first course of treatment and existence of central nervous system leukemia were both independent prognostic factors with the hazard ratios of 4.007 and 7.050 respectively and the 95% confidential intervals of 1.019 to 6.163 and 0.018 to 0.547 respectively (P = 0.045 and P = 0.008). The number of blasts 48 hours after the end of the first course of induction treatment was highly correlated with the rate of complete remission after the first treatment course (P = 0.000 028 8). CONCLUSION: With important prognostic significance, early treatment response, such as the number of blasts 48 hours after the end of the first course of induction treatment can predict whether complete remission can be achieved.

[Failure of treatment and protocol compliance in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the main reason of failure in treatment and compliance to protocol in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at a single institute which is located at the most developed city of China. METHODS: All the ALL patients who were diagnosed at the hospital from October 1998 to June 2003 were analyzed. The data were extracted from the department's tumor registry database. Failure in protocol compliance and treatment was analyzed within different risk groups, patients' resident area, and time period. The patients who had not received any therapy after ALL diagnosis were accounted as early protocol compliance failure, those who received therapy for less than 15 days were regarded as interim failure in protocol compliance, and those who gave up therapy or were lost in follow-up after 15 days with stable disease or complete remission (CR) were accounted as late compliance failure. RESULTS: Totally 224 patients were diagnosed to have ALL, of them 38 patients went home without receiving any therapy, i.e., the rate of early protocol compliance failure was 17.1%. Of the remaining 186 patients, 22 (10.5%) belonged to interim protocol compliance failure, and 6 cases discontinued the therapy after 15 days treatment, who were classified into late compliance failure. Six cases (10.5%) were regarded as protocol compliance failure among 57 Shanghainese, and so were 22 cases (17.1%) out of 129 non-Shanghainese. There was no significant difference between the two groups (chi(2) = 1.332, P > 0.05). Up to a median 40 months follow-up showed that in 52 patients (31.7%) the treatment failed, of which 37 cases (22.6%) died of incomplete response and relapse, and 15 cases (9.5%) died of therapy complication. Among different risk groups, 24 cases (47.1%) came from high risk group, 18 (34.0%) from medium risk group, and 5 (9.4%) from low risk group. Very significant difference was found among the different risk group (chi(2) = 21.463, P < 0.01). Treatment failure was 28.6% (32/112) in non-Shanghainese and 38.5% (20/52) in Shanghainese. Total failure in protocol compliance and treatment was 42.9% (32 + 22/129) in non-Shanghainese and 45.6% (20 + 6/57) in Shanghainese. The difference of treatment failure was not significant different between the two groups (chi(2) = 1.354, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Protocol compliance failure is the reason as important as the treatment failure for childhood ALL management failure. Either failure should not be neglected. Death from complications was relatively high which needs more attention, especially during induction period. Unusually high death rate occurred in high and medium risk group patients. The grouping criteria may need modification.