ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment options for cervical pregnancy (CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 74 patients diagnosed with CP at Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 2016 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 31 were treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) followed by hysteroscopic curettage, 34 were treated with hysteroscopic curettage alone, and nine were treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) followed by hysteroscopic curettage. Medical records and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gravidity, parity, abortion, or preoperative hemoglobin levels among the patients in the three groups; however, significant differences in gestational age, gestational sac diameter, preoperative ß-hCG, and presence of cardiac pulsation were observed (p < 0.05). After treatment, there was no conversion to laparotomy, and the uterus was preserved in all patients. Significant differences in blood loss during curettage, hospitalization costs, hospital days, menstrual recovery interval, ß-hCG decline rates, retained products of conception, and intrauterine adhesions rate among the three groups were observed (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the placement of the uterine Foley balloon, effective curettage rate, pre-and postoperative hemoglobin decline, live birth rate, or proportion of subsequent pregnancies among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that hysteroscopic curettage, HIFU, and UAE followed by hysteroscopic curettage are safe and effective for treating patients with CP. Compared with the UAE, HIFU has the advantages of lower hospitalization costs, shorter hospital stays, and shorter menstrual recovery intervals.
Subject(s)
Gestational Sac , Heart , Female , Pregnancy , Child , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of Pim-1 in the pathology of inflammatory bowel disease and the potential effect of Pim-1 inhibitor on treating such disease.⩠Methods: Forty-five BALB/c mice were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=9): A normal control group, a inflammatory bowel disease group, two different dose of Pim-1 inhibitor treatment groups, and steroidhormone treatment group. The model of inflammatory bowel disease was induced by intracolonic administration of 2, 4, 6-trinitrobenzenestdfonic acid (TNBS) and ethanol mixture. Mice were treated with Pim-1 inhibitor [intraperitoneal inject, 5 or 10 mg/(kg.d)] for 5 days and prednisone (intragastric administration, 0.1 mg/d) for 5 days. The DAI, colon length, gross score and pathological grade were evaluated. The expressions of T cell master transcription factors T-box expressed in T cells (T-bet), GATA binding protein 3 (GATA-3), RA orphan receptorγ (RORγt) and forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) were measured by Real-time PCR and Western blot, respectively.⩠Results: Pim-1 inhibitor and prednisone showed therapeutic effect on acute TNBS colitis in vivo. GATA3 and RORγt were significantly up-regulated in acute TNBS colitis (P<0.05). In contrast, the expression of Foxp3 was suppressed in the inflammatory bowel disease group, whereas it did not cause any significant change in T-bet expression (P>0.05). Administration of Pim-1 inhibitor and prednisone resulted in suppression of GATA3, RORγt expression, and the increase of Foxp3 expression (P<0.05). Administration of Pim-1 inhibitor and prednisone resulted in inhibition of T-bet mRNA expression (P<0.05), but only prednisone could inhibit T-bet protein expression (P>0.05).⩠Conclusion: Pim-1 inhibitor significantly suppresses Th2- and Th17-type immune responses. Furthermore, Pim-1 inhibitor could induce T-cell differentiation towards a Treg phenotype. Pim-1 inhibitor has therapeutic effect on acute TNBS colitis.
Subject(s)
Colitis/drug therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-pim-1/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Cell Differentiation , Colitis/chemically induced , Colitis/pathology , Colon/drug effects , Colon/pathology , Ethanol , Forkhead Transcription Factors/metabolism , GATA3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/chemically induced , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/pathology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group F, Member 3/metabolism , Prednisolone/pharmacology , Random Allocation , T-Box Domain Proteins/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/cytology , Trinitrobenzenesulfonic AcidABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation of Annexin A1 (ANXA1) expression with paclitaxel response and clinicopathological features of ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: The expression levels of ANXA1 in ovarian carcinoma SKOV3/Taxol-25 and SKOV3 cell lines were detected by Western blot and real time-PCR. The expression of ANXA1 protein in 42 specimens of ovarian carcinoma was examined by immunhistochemistry. The correlation of ANXA1 expression with paclitaxel response and clinicopathological features of ovarian carcinoma was analyzed. RESULTS: The expression level of ANXA1 was significantly lower in SKOV3/Taxol-25 cell line than that in SKOV3 cell line (P<0.05). The positive specimens of ANXA1 expression in paclitaxel-resistant tissues (14/20) were significantly lower than those in the sensitive ones (21/22, P<0.05), and there was also a significant difference between the mild and the strong positive specimens (P<0.01). The expression of ANXA1 protein showed no correlation with the type of mophology and histological grade of ovarian cancer (P>0.05), but it was correlated with the clinical stage(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: ANXA1 expression is downregulated in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, which might be a valuable predictor for paclitaxel susceptibility of ovarian carcinoma.
