Detection of spot urinary free metanephrines and 3-methoxytyramine with internal reference correction for the diagnosis of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

Detection of normetanephrine (NMN), metanephrine (MN) and 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT) could be used to diagnose pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). The accuracy for the diagnosis of PPGLs is only 6% by virtue of the classic symptom triad. In addition, false-positive results were found using plasma free MNs as biomarkers. Spot urinary free metanephrines (MNs) presented high specificity for PPGLs diagnosis in our previous work by HPLC with the electrochemical detection. Whereas, MNs and creatinine (Cr) need to be detected separately. A simple and specific method was urgently needed for the diagnosis of PPGLs. Here, we established a new HPLC method for spot urinary free MNs and 3-MT by the fluorescence detection and Cr by the ultraviolet detection simultaneously. It was worth mentioning that Cr for the virtue of being fairly constant in a given subject was used as an internal reference correction to eliminate the effect of spot urine volume for the diagnosis of PPGLs. Thirty-seven patients with PPGLs and 164 control subjects were detected by the established method and the peak area ratios of MNs and 3-MT to Cr were used innovatively for the diagnosis of PPGLs. The results showed acceptable precisions and recoveries. The sensitivities of the method were 94.6%, 91.9% and 86.5% and the specificities were 96.3%, 93.9% and 82.3%, respectively by the peak area of NMN/Cr, MN/Cr and 3-MT/Cr for the diagnosis. The established method provides a promising way for simple, rapid and accurate diagnosis of PPGLs.

High specificity of spot urinary free metanephrines in diagnosis and prognosis of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas by HPLC with electrochemical detection.

BACKGROUND: The metanephrines (MNs) in plasma and urine were proposed as biomarkers for the diagnosis of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). However, plasma free MNs and 24h urinary fractionated MNs were not satisfactory enough in specificity for the diagnosis of PPGLs. Moreover, the collection of 24h urine was inconvenient. This work examined the diagnostic and prognostic efficiency of free MNs in spot urine for PPGLs. METHODS: We measured free MNs concentration in spot urine and plasma of 28 PPGLs patients and 155 control subjects by HPLC with electrochemical detection. Postoperative free MNs levels in spot urine and plasma of 14 PPGLs patients were also determined. Creatinine (Cr) concentration was used for the correction of urine volume. RESULTS: The specificity of spot urinary free MNs/Cr in the diagnosis of PPGLs was significantly higher than that of plasma free MNs [normetanephrine (NMN), 98.7% (95.4%-99.8%) vs 93.0% (87.4%-96.6%); metanephrine (MN), 93.6% (88.5%-96.9%) vs 84.5% (77.5%-90.0%)]. Meanwhile, the positive likelihood ratios for spot urinary free NMN/Cr and MN/Cr were 69.21 and 13.29, compared with 12.68 and 5.30 for plasma free NMN and MN, respectively. For the PPGLs patients underwent surgery, the plasma free MNs level appeared an abnormal elevation and yielded false-positive results for some patients. Our findings were validated in an independent cohort, resulting in the specificity of 100% for both urinary free NMN/Cr and MN/Cr, and 97.3% and 83.8% for plasma free NMN and MN, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Spot urinary free MNs/Cr, superior to plasma free MNs, presented a promising biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of PPGLs.