ABSTRACT
AIM: To determine the anatomic and visual outcomes of prophylactic juxtapapillary laser photocoagulation treatment alone in the prevention of retinal detachment (RD) in a cohort of pediatric patients diagnosed with morning glory syndrome (MGS). METHODS: A total of 24 eyes of 22 consecutive patients aged 0-15y diagnosed with MGS treated with prophylactic juxtapapillary laser photocoagulation alone were reviewed. Data including demographics, ocular examination, anatomic and visual outcomes, following treatment and complications were collected. RESULTS: Two patients had bilateral laser treatment and 20 had monocular laser treatment. The age at treatment of 13 (59.1%) patients was less than 12mo. The presenting symptoms included strabismus (6/22, 27.3%), decreased vision (2/22, 9.1%), and routine fundus screening (14/22, 63.6%). Fifteen (68.2%) patients underwent cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations, and 3 of those 15 (20.0%) had abnormal findings in the nervous system. Based on preoperative wide-field fundus photography and B-scan echography, all (100.0%) eyes had no obvious RD. On postoperative 1mo and 6mo and the following follow-ups, the anatomic outcomes of all eyes remained stable. The mean follow-up duration was 27.7±17.5mo. No severe complications were found. Preoperative visual acuity acquired from 2 (9.1%) patients ranged from light perception to 20/200. Postoperative acuity acquired from 11 (50.0%) patients ranged from light perception to 20/125. CONCLUSION: The preliminary anatomic and visual outcomes of prophylactic juxtapapillary laser treatment alone in pediatric MGS patients are relatively stable in a short-term follow-up. Further long-term clinical observation will be needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube is a rare complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or percutaneous nephrostomy. The mechanism of misplacement of a nephrostomy tube into the vascular system is seldom investigated. One type of the possible mechanism is that the puncture needle penetrates a major intrarenal tributary of the renal vein and enters the collecting system. However, the guidewire is located outside the collecting system near the large branches of renal vein or perforates into the renal vein. The dilation is performed and causes a large torn injury. Subsequently, the nephrostomy tube is placed inside the vessel when radiological monitoring is not used. However, there is no imaging evidence and the scene of procedure is not demonstrated. This paper reports two cases of visualization of the renal vein filled with contrast agent during PCNL. The findings may be good evidence to support the step of renal vein injury in patients with intravenous nephrostomy tube misplacement. CASE PRESENTATION: We presented two cases with visualization of the renal vein filled with contrast agent during PCNL. In the process of injecting the contrast agent through the puncture needle, we could see the renal vein. Moreover, it was identified that the puncture needle tip was not on the optimal position. The position of puncture needle tip lay outside the collecting system, which was close to the calyceal infundibulum and branches of renal vein. CONCLUSIONS: Visualization of the renal vein filled with contrast agent may be good evidence to verify the renal vein injury in patients with intravenous nephrostomy tube misplacement during PCNL or percutaneous nephrostomy. The suboptimal location of the puncture needle tip and visualization of the renal vein filled with contrast agent indicate the renal vein injury. One type of mechanism of intravenous nephrostomy tube misplacement is as following. Firstly, the guidewire stays outside the collecting system. Subsequently, dilatation directed by the guidewire results in the injury of the vein. Then, the nephrostomy tube migrates into the venous system due to prompt tube inserting and the direction of the sheath and/or the guidewire to the injured vein.
