Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 30(11): 1525-31, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26319887

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality associated with complications of colorectal surgery. Furthermore, AL results in prolonged hospital stays and significant increase in costs of medical resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we investigated the impact of anastomosis technique on the rate of anastomotic leak. The rate of leak was compared between two groups performing end-to-end (E-E) vs. side-to-end (S-E) anastomosis. The impact of various risk factors was also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 382 E-E and 363 S-E anastomoses after left colectomy or rectal resections. The anastomotic leak rate was 8.64 % using E-E compared to 1.93 % using S-E anastomosis technique (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the rate of anastomotic leak after left colon and rectum resections could be significantly reduced utilizing S-E anastomosis technique.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Colectomy/adverse effects , Rectum/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Colectomy/methods , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Stapling
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...