Additive value of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block and serratus anterior plane block in lung transplantation surgery: a retrospective exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control following lung transplantation (LTx) surgery is paramount. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the gold standard; however, the potential use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and consequent anticoagulation therapy raises safety concerns, prompting clinicians to seek safer alternatives. The utility of thoracic wall blocks in general thoracic surgery is well established; however, their role in the context of LTx has been poorly investigated. METHODS: In this retrospective exploratory study, we assessed the effect of adding a superficial parasternal intercostal plane (sPIP) block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block to standard anesthetic and analgesic care on tracheal extubation rates, pain scores and opioid consumption until 72 hours postoperatively in LTx. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the analysis; 35 received the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (control group), and 25 received sPIP and SAP blocks in addition to the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (intervention group). We observed higher tracheal extubation rates in the intervention group at 8 hours postoperatively (16.0% vs 0.0%, p=0.03). This was also shown after adjusting for known prognostic factors (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33, p=0.02). Furthermore, we noted a lower opioid consumption measured by morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours in the intervention group (median 405 (IQR 300-490) vs 266 (IQR 168-366), p=0.02). This was also found after adjusting for known prognostic factors (ß -118; 95% CI -221 to 14, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: sPIP and SAP blocks are safe regional analgesic techniques in LTx involving ECMO and clamshell incision. They are associated with faster tracheal extubation and lower opioid consumption. These techniques should be considered when TEA is not appropriate. Further high-quality studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Regional analgesia for lung transplantation: A narrative review.

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the definitive treatment for end-stage pulmonary disease. About 4500 LTxs are performed annually worldwide. It is considered challenging and complex surgery regarding anaesthesia and pain management. While providing adequate analgesia is crucial for patient comfort, early mobilisation and prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications, standardising an analgesic protocol is challenging due to the diversity of aetiologies, surgical approaches and the potential use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Although thoracic epidural analgesia is commonly considered the gold standard, concerns regarding procedural safety and its potential for devastating consequences have led physicians to seek safer analgesic modalities such as thoracic nerve blocks. The advantages of thoracic nerve blocks for general thoracic surgery are well established. However, their utility in LTx remains unclear. Considering paucity of relevant literature, this review aims to raise awareness about the literature gap in the field and highlight the need for further high-quality studies determining the effectiveness of available techniques.

Flouroscopic versus conventional epidural blood patch in obstetrics: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Epidural blood patch is a common effective treatment for postdural puncture headache after accidental dural puncture during labor and may be done in conventional or fluoroscopy-guided methods. The aim of this study was to compare intensity of headache at the time of discharge from the hospital and to compare blood volumes injected in conventional epidural blood patches versus fluoroscopic-guided blood patches and evaluate the side effects of both method of treatment. METHODS: Between the years 2010 and 2020, 84 patients who were diagnosed with postdural puncture headache received either a conventional epidural blood patch or a fluoroscopic-guided blood patch. Blood volumes were compared and evaluation of side effects was made based on data collected during and after the procedure. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were included in this study. Fifty-two women in the conventional epidural blood patch group and 32 in the fluoroscopic-guided blood patch group. Women in the conventional epidural blood patch group received statistically significantly higher doses of blood than women in the fluoroscopic-guided blood patch group: conventional method 29 ml IQR [23-36] versus fluoroscopic method 16 ml, IQR [12-18], p < .001 with no difference in headache pain intensity at hospital release. There was no difference between groups in hospital length of stay, or persistent PDPH. There was also no difference chronic headache or backache between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Women who received fluoroscopic epidural blood patch required a much lower volume of blood injected while there was no difference between groups in headache pain intensity at discharge.

Comparison of nutritional screening and diagnostic tools in diagnosis of severe malnutrition in critically ill patients.

RATIONALE: While various nutritional assessment tools have been proposed, consensus is lacking with respect to the most effective tool to identify severe malnutrition in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in an adult general intensive care unit (ICU) comparing four nutritional assessment tools: Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS), Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC), and malnutrition criteria proposed by European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). These criteria were tested for their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in diagnosis of severe malnutrition, defined as Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) C. RESULTS: Hospitalization records for 120 critically ill patients were analyzed. 60 (50%), 17 (14.2%) and 43 (35.8%) patients were classified as SGA A, B, and C, respectively. The sensitivity in diagnosis of severe malnutrition was 79.1%, 58.1%, 65.1%, and 65.1%, and specificity was 94.8%, 74.0%, 94.8%, and 98.7% for NRS, NUTRIC, ESPEN, and ASPEN, respectively. NRS, ESPEN, and ASPEN had higher PPV (89.5%, 87.5%, and 87.5%, respectively) and NPV (89%, 83%, and 83.5%, respectively) than NUTRIC (PPV 55.6% and NPV 76%). NUTRIC showed the highest correlation with mortality, but none of the tools retained their correlation with mortality after adjustment for potential confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: NRS showed the highest sensitivity and high specificity, PPV, and NPV. NUTRIC had least effective overall performance in diagnosis of severe malnutrition in an ICU setting. A larger population may be required to explore the association between mortality and these nutritional assessment tools.

Telomere Length Changes during Critical Illness: A Prospective, Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: evaluation of telomere length change in acutely ill adult patients. DESIGN: Blood samples were drawn on the first and seventh day of intensive care unit (ICU) stay to assess telomere length using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique. Demographic data collected included age, weight, admission diagnosis, baseline laboratory values (pH, C- reactive protein (CRP), serum albumin level, white blood cell count (WBC) count, platelet count), and baseline SOFA and APACHE II scores. Additional data collected during the ICU stay included a repeated WBC count, the presence of positive blood cultures and outcome data, including death in the ICU or following discharge, whether ventilated or not at ICU discharge, and destination following discharge, i.e., medical ward or rehabilitation. SETTING: General ICU in tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Forty patients admitted to the ICU within 72 h of hospital admission suffering from an acute illness were included in this prospective, observational study. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 40 patients studied, telomere shortening was noted in 21, telomere lengthening in 11, and no significant change in the other eight. The age of patients demonstrating telomere shortening was statistically significantly younger (45.4 vs. 61.5 years, p < 0.023) compared to those showing increased telomere length. In addition, a significant correlation was observed between the difference in telomere length and the corresponding difference in WBC count (telomere shortening was associated with a decreased WBC count and vice versa). A trend toward shortening was seen in patients with sepsis (p = 0.07). No significant correlations were found for any other demographic or outcome parameter and changes in telomere length. CONCLUSION: Changes in telomere length, both shortening and lengthening, were evident in the acute setting, but no associations between such changes with outcome were noted. Further studies in more homogeneous groups of patients appear to be warranted.