Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Coll Antropol ; 34 Suppl 2: 213-5, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21302724

ABSTRACT

The aim of this randomized, prospective, study was to evaluate postoperative hospital mortality and morbidity after mitral valve repair by comparing two surgical techniques for resolving mitral valve insufficiency in elderly patients. In comparison were: mitral valve repair vs. mitral valve replacement in patients older than 70 years. In period from January 1st 2006 until August 30th 2009. Eighty patients with mitral valve disease, isolated or associated with other comorbidities, were scheduled for mitral valve repair or mitral valve replacement in our institution. Patients were randomized in two groups, one scheduled for mitral valve repair and another one for mitral valve replacement using the envelope method with random numbers. Results show no difference in hospital mortality and morbidity postoperatively in both groups. In group undergoing valve replacement we had one significant complication of ventricle rupture in emphatically calcified posterior part of mitral valve annulus. In conclusion we found no distinction in postoperative hospital mortality and morbidity after using one of two surgical techniques.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/methods , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/adverse effects , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/mortality , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Prospective Studies
3.
Coll Antropol ; 32(2): 381-4, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18756885

ABSTRACT

The aim of this randomised, prospective study was to evaluate hospital mortality and morbidity after myocardial revascularisation, comparing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) myocardial revascularisation versus off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) myocardial revascularisation in population with multivessels coronary artery disease. Sixty patients with multivessels coronary artery diseases were scheduled to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting from January 15, 2006 to June 30, 2007 in our institution. Patients were randomized to off-pump or on-pump surgery with intermittent cross-clamping of aorta and ventricular fibrillation, using the envelope method with random numbers. In the results only difference we did find postoperatively was in Creatine Kinase-MB (CK-MB) release, the amount of bleeding and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (p<0.05). There was no diference between the two groups of patients regarding incidence of main morbidity and hospital moratlity. In summary, we didn't find no superiority in any of the two techniques regarding on hospital mortality and morbidity.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass , Aorta , Constriction , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/adverse effects , Creatine Kinase, MB Form/blood , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Ventricular Fibrillation/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...