ABSTRACT
Background: Most of the ischemia-reperfusion injury (IR-I) occurs during reperfusion and is mediated by the immune system. In this study we determined whether immunomodulation with hyper-Interleukin-6 (a recombinant designer cytokine composed of interleukin-6 linked to its soluble receptor) is protective against IR-I in mice kidneys. Methods: Hyper-Interleukin-6 (HIL-6) was administered by in vivo plasmid DNA transfection to 10 male mice. Twenty-four hours later, unilateral nephrectomy was done. IR-I immediately followed by closure of the remaining kidney vascular pedicle for 40 min. Seven mice transfected with non-coding control plasmid served as the control group. The functional and morphological effects of IR-I and its effect on mice longevity were explored. This was done by serial blood tests and by histopathology done upon sacrifice of the animals at post-operative day 7. Findings: Mice pretreated with HIL-6 had a mean creatinine level at post-operative day 1 of 35.45 ± 4.03 µmol/l and mean Urea level was 14.18 ± 2.69 mmol/l, whereas mean creatinine was 89.33 ± 69.27 µmol/l (P = 0.025), and mean urea was 38.17 ± 20.77 mmol/l (P = 0.0024) in the control group. Histological changes in the control group included inflammatory infiltration, tubular damage, and architectural distortion. These were not seen in the treatment group. Seven days post-operatively the survival rate of treated mice was 100% compared to 50% in the control group (P = 0.015). Interpretation: In this single kidney mouse model, pretreatment with HIL-6 administration effectively protected against IR-I both morphologically and functionally. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanism and feasibility of using this immunomodulator.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Patients treated by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized carcinoma of the prostate (CAP) often suffer from urinary obstruction. While most patients can be treated medically, some require transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) for alleviation of obstruction. The consequences of combing EBRT and TURP are controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the success and complication rates of TURP combined with EBRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2017, 3501 patients underwent TURP. Sixty-six of them were treated with EBRT for CAP. Surgical complications according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) scale and the need for secondary interventions were compared to 66 randomly selected patients operated on for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). RESULTS: Patients who underwent TURP for BPH were significantly older compared to the patients with CAP with an average of 76.4 (SD 4.3) vs 71 (SD 8.2) years, p<0.0001. Substantial post-operative complications were rare in both groups with only a single case of CD grade 3 in each group. However, patients with CAP required significantly more secondary surgeries (21% vs 6%, p=0.02) and significantly more additional interventions (37.9% vs 13.6%, p=0.0025). There was no difference in complication rate, in the need for additional interventions or in the oncological outcome when comparing patients operated before or after EBRT. CONCLUSION: The complication rate of TURP done before or after EBRT is low and comparable to surgery for BPH. However, the rates of secondary surgeries and additional interventions in these patients are high (40%). TURP before or after EBRT provides similar results.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To our knowledge the effect of testicular torsion on the pregnancy rate is unknown. In this study we focused on the pregnancy rate, which is the ultimate index of fertility status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 273 patients who presented to our emergency room with testicular torsion between 1994 and 2014. Study inclusion criteria included being in a relationship with the intent to conceive for at least 1 year, age greater than 25 years and a normal contralateral testis. Patients with primary infertility, those who were unwilling to participate or unreachable and those with a history of undescended testis and/or varicocele were excluded from analysis. Patients were contacted by telephone and interviewed according to a standardized questionnaire. Pregnancy rates in the orchiopexy and orchiectomy groups were compared to each other and to the accepted pregnancy rate in the literature. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients met study inclusion criteria, including 41 and 22 in the orchiopexy and orchiectomy groups, respectively. The pregnancy rate in the orchiopexy and orchiectomy groups was 90.2% and 90.9%, respectively (p = 1.0). The accepted pregnancy rate in the general population is 82% to 92%. Mean ± SD time to pregnancy in the orchiopexy and orchiectomy groups was 6.6 ± 5.50 and 7.2 ± 5.4 months, respectively (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Several studies suggest decreased fertility potential in patients with a history of testicular torsion. However, in the current study in couples in which the male had a history of testicular torsion the pregnancy rate and the interval to pregnancy were within the accepted range of the general population.
