Metatarsalgia: anatomy, pathology and management.

Metatarsalgia is a common presentation, particularly in middle-aged women. This review discusses the anatomical basis and classifies the different pathologies into primary, secondary and iatrogenic. The key elements to differentiate the pathologies within each classification which could cause a patient to suffer with metatarsalgia are outlined. Further investigations are briefly covered, but a linked article discusses the investigations of metatarsalgia in more detail. The article gives an overview of metatarsalgia to help clinicians to investigate and manage these symptoms.

Imaging in metatarsalgia.

Metatarsalgia is a common clinical conundrum that requires careful assessment. There are a variety of causes and understanding these can help manage the pain. These causes have different imaging characteristics and require specific imaging. By understanding core imaging principles and how they apply to causes of metatarsalgia, pathology can be more efficiently investigated. This article covers primary, secondary and iatrogenic causes of metatarsalgia with the most appropriate imaging modalities for each and the salient imaging findings. This article reviews the common forefoot pathologies and how they may be optimally radiologically investigated, with an emphasis on the key imaging findings.

Managing the patient with heel pain.

Heel pain presents frequently to primary care, commonly affecting athletic and elderly patients. Its presentation can be a common source of confusion for clinicians given the wide variety of differential diagnoses and the similarities in presenting symptoms and signs. This review classifies heel pain according to site of pain and explores the common pathologies clinicians may encounter. A brief summary of common imaging modalities used is provided. The literature is reviewed to guide evidence-based practice and to provide a framework to help clinicians investigate and manage heel pain before onward referral for specialist intervention. A linked article detailing the imaging of heel pain is included in this issue ( https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2019.80.4.192 ).

Imaging the patient with heel pain.

Heel pain is a common presentation in primary care and affects a wide range of the population but predominantly elderly, obese and athletic patients. History and clinical assessment are paramount in the management of this condition but the presentation can confound clinicians, necessitating the use of imaging to confirm or clarify the diagnosis when there is clinical uncertainty. This article illustrates the various conditions producing heel pain to help clinicians determine the appropriate imaging modality to image the common causes of heel pain. A linked article detailing the management of heel pain is included in this issue ( https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2019.80.4.196 ).

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis versus proximal phalanx hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus: feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (hallux rigidus) leads to pain and poor function and mobility. Arthrodesis is the gold standard treatment for end-stage disease. Total joint arthroplasties have been attempted, but early loosening has been attributed to dorsally directed shear forces on the metatarsal component. Metallic proximal phalangeal hemiarthroplasty theoretically avoids this. Whilst early results are promising, no comparative trials exist comparing this to arthrodesis. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objectives are to determine the range of outcome scores between the two treatment arms (to inform a power calculation). Outcome measures will include the MOXFQ, AOFAS-Hallux and EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L. Secondary objectives are to determine the accrual rate, dropout rate and trial acceptability to both patients and surgeons. These data will allow the development of a larger trial with longer follow-up.This is a prospective randomised controlled single-centre study comparing proximal phalanx hemiarthroplasty (AnaToemic, Arthrex Ltd., Sheffield, UK) with arthrodesis (15 patients in each arm). Randomisation will be performed using a 1:1 allocation ratio in blocks of six.Patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be recruited from three foot and ankle consultant surgeon's clinics (East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust). If agreeable, informed consent will be obtained before patients are randomised.The outcome measure scores will be completed pre-operatively and repeated at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. A radiological review will be performed at 6 weeks and 12 months to determine rates of loosening (hemiarthroplasty) and union (arthrodesis). Data on length of stay, return to work, complications and re-operation rates will also be collected.The analysis will compare the change in outcome scores between treatment groups at all follow-up time points. Scores will be compared using a Student t-test, adjusting for scores at baseline.This study will be conducted in accordance with the current revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (1996) and the ICH-GCP Guideline (International Conference on Harmonisation, Good Clinical Practice, E6(R1), 1996). This study has been approved by the sponsor, the Trust Research & Development office. Ethical approval has been received from the National Research Ethics Service (North East: 12/NE/0385 for protocol version 5.3 dated 3 June 2013). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN88273654.

Second metatarsophalangeal joint instability and second metatarsal length association depends on the method of measurement.

INTRODUCTION: Second metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) instability is an important cause of forefoot pain and its causation multi-factorial. There is debate over an association with a relatively increased second metatarsal length and numerous measurement techniques. It is not known which, if any correlate with second MTPJ instability or their accuracy. We hypothesized that the method of measurement would affect the apparent relationship between second metatarsal length and second MTP instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed standardized radiographs of 81 feet with second MTPJ instability using methods described by Coughlin, Maestro, and Hardy/Clapham. A control group of 11 feet were assessed from patients with a clinical diagnosis of Morton's neuroma (no instability) and successfully treated with a single steroid injection. The hallux valgus angle was also recorded. Patients mean age was 56 (range, 25 to 84) years, with female to male ratio of 4:1 and equal laterality. RESULTS: Second metatarsal length measurements were not significantly different between grades of instability using any method, although Kruskal-Wallis analysis revealed a significant association between instability grades and increasing age (p<0.05). Analysis of relative metatarsal lengths and second MTPJ instability revealed Coughlins method approached statistical significance (p < 0.055), but upon standardizing for age it became statistically significantly associated (r = 0.21, n83: p < 0.05). Spearman's rho correlation identified increasing hallux valgus was associated with decreased the second metatarsal length for Maestro and Hardy & Clapham methods (r = -0.29, n92: p < 0.005) and (r = -0.36, n86: p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: A positive correlation of second metatarsal length to second MTPJ instability existed using Coughlins method controlling for age. Maestro and Hardy & Clapham methods were possibly influenced by co-existing hallux valgus. The association of a clinical finding with a possible causative factor is likely influenced by its method of radiographic measurement.

Posterior ankle arthroscopy portal safety regarding proximity to the tibial and sural nerves.

The aim of this cadaveric study was to assess the relative safety of posterior ankle arthroscopy portal sites regarding their distance from the tibial and sural nerves. We dissected 20 embalmed cadaveric lower limbs, carefully exposed the nerves, preserving their original position, and established the entry points of five posterior ankle portals using pins. We measured distances with a digital calliper and used Friedman test and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests for statistical analyses. There was unequal safety between the five portals (p = 0.00001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two posterolateral or two posteromedial portals. The trans-Achilles tendon portal as expected was significantly further away from either nerve (p = 0.00001). In conclusion, the trans-Achilles portal is the safest portal in terms of its distance from the nerves but has the disadvantage of surgical injury to the Achilles tendon. The two medial and two lateral posterior portals are equivalent in terms of safety.