ABSTRACT
The rapid growth in the prevalence of infectious diseases requires timely action from drug developers. In recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the unpreparedness of the population for such emergencies. The introduction of modern methods of Design of Experiments (DoE) is required to accelerate the process of drug development and bring a drug to market. The main objective of this study was to develop an ion-triggered in situ system for intranasal delivery of VLP using a Quality by Design approach. Based on a literature review and initial studies, the key QTPP, CQA, CPP, and CMA were identified to develop a novel delivery system for virus-like particles. As a result of the studies on the quality attributes of the developed delivery system, an ion-triggered in situ gel meeting all the specified parameters was obtained using the Quality by Design method.
ABSTRACT
Implantation is a modern method of administering chemotherapeutic agents, with a highly targeted effect and better patient tolerance due to the low frequency of administration. Implants are capable of controlled release, which makes them a viable alternative to infusional chemotherapy, allowing patients to enjoy a better quality of life without the need for prolonged hospitalization. Compared to subcutaneous implantation, intratumoral implantation has a number of significant advantages in terms of targeting and side effects, but this area of chemotherapy is still poorly understood in terms of clinical trials. At the same time, there are more known developments of drugs in the form of implants and injections for intratumoral administration. The disadvantages of classical intratumoral implants are the need for surgical intervention to install the system and the increased risk of tumor rupture noted by some specialists. The new generation of implants are in situ implants-systems formed in the tumor due to a phase transition (sol-gel transition) under the influence of various stimuli. Among this systems some are highly selective for a certain type of malignant neoplasm. Such systems are injected and have all the advantages of intratumoral injections, but due to the phase transition occurring in situ, they form depot forms that allow the long-term release of chemotherapeutic agents.
ABSTRACT
In modern pharmaceutical technology, modified-release dosage forms, such as in situ formed implants, are gaining rapidly in popularity. These dosage forms are created based on a configurable matrix consisting of phase-sensitive polymers capable of biodegradation, a hydrophilic solvent, and the active substance suspended or dissolved in it. The most used phase-sensitive implants are based on a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer, poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines the reasons for the phenomenon of active ingredient "burst" release, which is a major drawback of PLGA-based in situ formed implants, and the likely ways to correct this phenomenon to improve the quality of in situ formed implants with a poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) matrix. DATA SOURCES: Actual and relevant publications in PubMed and Google Scholar databases were studied. STUDY SELECTION: The concept of the review was based on the theory developed during literature analysis of 12 effectors on burst release from in situ forming implants based on PLGA. Only those studies that sufficiently fully disclosed one or another component of the theory were included. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in development of a systematic approach called the "12 Factor System", which considers various constant and variable, endogenous and exogenous factors that can influence the nature of 'burst release' of active ingredients from PLGA polymer-based in situ formed implants. These factors include matrix porosity, polymer swelling, LA:GA ratio, PLGA end groups, polymer molecular weight, active ingredient structure, polymer concentration, polymer loading with active ingredients, polymer combination, use of co-solvents, addition of excipients, and change of dissolution conditions. This review also considered different types of kinetics of active ingredient release from in situ formed implants and the possibility of using the "burst release" phenomenon to modify the active ingredient release profile at the site of application of this dosage form.
