ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Significant changes in the management of acute pancreatitis have taken place since the 2004 Pamplona Consensus Conference. The objective of this conference has been the revision and updating of the Conference recommendations, in order to unify the integral management of potentially severe acute pancreatitis in an ICU. PARTICIPANTS: Spanish and international intensive medicine physicians, radiologists, surgeons, gastroenterologists, emergency care physicians and other physicians involved in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE AND GRADES OF RECOMMENDATION: The GRADE method has been used for drawing them up. DRAWING UP THE RECOMMENDATIONS: The selection of the committee members was performed by means of a public announcement. The bibliography has been revised from 2004 to the present day and 16 blocks of questions on acute pancreatitis in a ICU have been drawn up. Firstly, all the questions according to groups have been drawn up in order to prepare one document. This document has been debated and agreed upon by computer at the SEMICYUC Congress and lastly at the Consensus Conference which was held with the sole objective of drawing up these recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Eighty two recommendations for acute pancreatitis management in an ICU have been presented. Of these 84 recommendations, we would emphasize the new determinants-based classification of acute pancreatitis severity, new surgical techniques and nutritional recommendations. Note. This summary only lists the 84 recommendations of the 16 questions blocks except blocks greater relevance and impact of its novelty or because they modify the current management.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Pancreatitis/diagnosis , Pancreatitis/therapy , Acute Disease , Hemodiafiltration , Humans , Pancreatitis/classification , Pancreatitis/surgeryABSTRACT
There is a growing body of evidence that early management of patients with acute pancreatitis may alter the natural course of disease and improve outcomes of patients. The aim of this paper is to optimize the management of patients with acute pancreatitis during the first 72 h after hospital admission by proposing several clinical care pathways. The proposed pathways are based on the SEMICYUC 2005 Recommendations with incorporation of the latest developments in the field, particularly the determinants-based classification of acute pancreatitis severity. The pathways also incorporate the "alarm signs", the use of therapeutic modalities known as PANCREAS, and the "call to ICU" criteria. Further studies will need to assess whether the adoption of these pathway reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with acute pancreatitis. The previous SEMICYUC guidelines on management of patients with acute pancreatitis in Intensive Care will need to be revised to reflect the recent developments in the field.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Critical Pathways , Pancreatitis/therapy , Acute Disease , Algorithms , Analgesia , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Combined Modality Therapy , Critical Care/methods , Disease Management , Enteral Nutrition , Fluid Therapy , Humans , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/etiology , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Necrosis , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatitis/classification , Pancreatitis/diagnosis , Pancreatitis/pathology , Pancreatitis/surgery , Patient Care Team , Severity of Illness Index , Societies, Medical , SpainABSTRACT
Objetivo. La pancreatitis aguda grave (PAG) no se ha estudiado desde la Medicina Intensiva y menos su manejo integral. El objetivo es consensuar el diagnóstico y tratamiento en una UCI, con todas las Sociedades implicadas y ofrecer unas recomendaciones que uniformicen el manejo integral de las PAG. Ámbito. Español. Pamplona, 11 y 12 de marzo de 2004. Participantes. Intensivistas nacionales, gastroenterólogos de la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEGE) y Club Español Biliopancreático (CEBP), cirujanos de la Asociación Española de Cirugía, Sección de Infección Quirúrgica (IQ-AEC), radiólogos de la Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica (SERAM), y Sección de Imagen Abdominal (SEDIA) y miembros de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES). Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación. Se eligieron las escalas del Oxford Centre for Evidence based Medicine. Elaboración de las recomendaciones. Se realizó una convocatoria pública en la que se discutieron todos los temas previamente seleccionados, que se distribuyeron en 4 bloques de preguntas: 1.ª ¿Diagnóstico, criterios precoces de gravedad y de ingreso de las PAG en UCI?. 2.ª ¿Cuáles son las medidas más relevantes y aplicables en el tratamiento del paciente con PAG en UCI?. 3.ª ¿Cuál es el tratamiento actual de la PAG?. 4.ª ¿Qué actitud quirúrgica se debe adoptar ante la PAG con necrosis no-infectada y la sepsis pancreática? Tras la discusión pública el Jurado elaboró un documento de recomendaciones. Este documento fue enviado para su comentario a los miembros del Comité Organizador, a los ponentes y a los asistentes a la Conferencia de Consenso. Por último, las recomendaciones fueron de nuevo discutidas en una sesión pública y abierta en el Congreso Nacional de la SEMICYUC. Conclusiones. Recomendaciones en PAG entre las que destacamos: la disminución de la mortalidad de la PAG depende de la estratificación temprana de las formas graves a la puerta del hospital, durante las primeras 48-96 horas y del ingreso precoz en Intensivos. Los pacientes que muestran un progresivo deterioro orgánico, aunque no precisen soporte ventilatorio, deben ingresar en UCI. Cada Centro debe consensuar un protocolo interdisciplinario. Los antibióticos como profilaxis no tienen una base de evidencia potente sólo estarían indicados en las formas necrotizantes y a la espera de un nuevo ensayo doble-ciego con meropenem en marcha. El tratamiento quirúrgico se indica en la necrosis pancreática infectada o absceso identificadas por radiología o punción radiodirigida. El manejo de las formas estériles debe ser conservador
Objective. Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) has not been studied from the point of view of Intensive Medicine and even less its integral management. The objective is to reach a consensus on the diagnosis and treatment in an ICU with all the societies involved and to offer some recommendations that make the integral management of SAP uniform. Scope. Spanish. He took place in Pamplona, the 11-12 March 2004. Participants. National Intensivists, Gastroenterologists of the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology (AEGE) and Biliopancreatic Spanish Club (CEBP), Surgeons of the Spanish Association of Surgery, Surgical Infection Section (IQ-AEC), Radiologists of the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM), and Abdominal Image Section (SEDIA) as well as member of the Spanish Society of Urgency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES). Evidence levels and recommendation grades. The Oxford Centre for Evidence based Medicine scales were chosen. Elaboration of the recommendations. A public examination session was called in which all the previously selected subjects were discussed. They were distributed into 4 blocks of questions: 1) Diagnostic, Early Severity criteria and Admission of SAP in the ICU? 2) What are the most relevant and applicable measures in the treatment of the patients with SAP in the ICU? 3) What is the present treatment of SAP? 4) What surgical attitude should be adopted in the face of SAP with non-infected necrosis and pancreatic sepsis? After the public discussion, the Jury elaborated a recommendations document. This document was sent to the members of the Organizing Committee, to the speakers and those attending the consensus Conference for their comments. Finally, the recommendations were discussed again in a public and open session in the National Congress of SEMICYUC.Conclusions. Recommendations in SAP, among which we emphasize: Decrease in mortality of SAP depends on the early stratifying of the serious forms to the hospital door, during the first 48-96 hours and early admission in Intensive Care. Patient who have a progressive organic deterioration, although they do not require ventilatory support, should be admitted to the ICU. Each Center should agree on an interdisciplinary protocol. Antibiotics as prophylaxis do not have a strong evidence base. They would only be indicated in necrotizing forms and while waiting for a new on-going double blind clinical trial with meropenem. Surgical treatment is indicated in infected pancreatic necrosis or abscess, identified by radiology or radioguided puncture. Management of the sterile forms should be conservative
