Leveling Up the Access to Radiation Therapy in Latin America: Economic Analysis of Investment, Equity, and Inclusion Opportunities Up to 2030.

PURPOSE: Latin America faces a shortage in radiation therapy (RT) units and qualified personnel for timely and high-quality treatment of patients with cancer. Investing in equitable and inclusive access to RT over the next decade would prevent thousands of deaths. Measuring the investment gap and payoff is necessary for stakeholder discussions and capacity planning efforts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were collected from the International Atomic Energy Agency's Directory of Radiotherapy Centers, industry stakeholders, and individual surveys sent to national scientific societies. Nationwide data on available devices and personnel were compiled. The 10 most common cancers in 2020 with RT indication and their respective incidence rates were considered for gap calculations. The gross 2-year financial return on investment was calculated based on an average monthly salary across Latin America. A 10-year cost projection was calculated according to the estimated population dynamics for the period until 2030. RESULTS: Eleven countries were included in the study, accounting for 557,213,447 people in 2020 and 561 RT facilities. Approximately 1,065,684 new cancer cases were diagnosed, and a mean density of 768,469 (standard deviation ±392,778) people per available unit was found. By projecting the currently available treatment fractions to determine those required in 2030, it was found that 62.3% and 130.8% increases in external beam RT and brachytherapy units are needed from the baseline, respectively. An overall regional investment of approximately United States (US) $349,650,480 in 2020 would have covered the existing demand. An investment of US $872,889,949 will be necessary by 2030, with the expectation of a 2-year posttreatment gross return on investment of more than US $2.1 billion from patients treated in 2030 only. CONCLUSIONS: Investment in RT services is lagging in Latin America in terms of the population's needs. An accelerated outlay could save additional lives during the next decade, create a self-sustaining system, and reduce region-wide inequities in cancer care access. Cash flow analyses are warranted to tailor precise national-level intervention strategies.

Modern Radiotherapy Technology: Obstacles and Opportunities to Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have a large burden of cancer with differential population needs and outcomes compared to high-income countries. Access to radiotherapy, especially modern technology, is a major challenge. Modern radiotherapy has been demonstrated with better utility in overall cancer outcomes. We deliberate various challenges and opportunities unique to LMICs' set up for access to modern radiotherapy technology in the light of discussions and deliberations made during the recently concluded annual meeting of Tata Memorial Centre, India. We take examples available from various LMICs in this direction in our manuscript.

Radiotherapy utilization in developing countries: An IAEA study.

BACKGROUND: The planning of national radiotherapy (RT) services requires a thorough knowledge of the country's cancer epidemiology profile, the radiotherapy utilization (RTU) rates and a future projection of these data. Previous studies have established RTU rates in high-income countries. METHODS: Optimal RTU (oRTU) rates were determined for nine middle-income countries, following the epidemiological evidence-based method. The actual RTU (aRTU) rates were calculated dividing the total number of new notifiable cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in 2012 by the total number of cancer patients diagnosed in the same year in each country. An analysis of the characteristics of patients and treatments in a series of 300 consecutive radiotherapy patients shed light on the particular patient and treatments profile in the participating countries. RESULTS: The median oRTU rate for the group of nine countries was 52% (47-56%). The median aRTU rate for the nine countries was 28% (9-46%). These results show that the real proportion of cancer patients receiving RT is lower than the optimal RTU with a rate difference between 10-42.7%. The median percent-unmet need was 47% (18-82.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal RTU rate in middle-income countries did not differ significantly from that previously found in high-income countries. The actual RTU rates were consistently lower than the optimal, in particular in countries with limited resources and a large population.

Radiotherapy in small countries.

AIM: To examine the availability of radiotherapy in small countries. METHODS: A small country was defined as a country with a population less than one million persons. The economic status of each country was defined using the World Bank Classification. The number of cancers in each country was obtained from GLOBOCAN 2012. The number of cancer cases with an indication or radiotherapy was calculated using the CCORE model. RESULTS: There were 41 countries with a population of under 1 million; 15 were classified as High Income, 15 Upper Middle Income, 10 Lower Middle Income and one Low Income. 28 countries were islands. Populations ranged from 799 (Holy See) to 886450 (Fiji) and the total number of cancer cases occurring in small countries was 21,043 (range by country from 4 to 2476). Overall the total number of radiotherapy cases in small countries was 10982 (range by country from 2 to 1239). Radiotherapy was available in all HIC islands with 80 or more new cases of cancer in 2012 but was not available in any LMIC island. Fiji was the only LMIC island with a large radiotherapy caseload. Similar caseloads in non-island LMIC all had radiotherapy services. Most non-island HIC did not have radiotherapy services presumably because of the easy access to radiotherapy in neighbouring countries. CONCLUSION: There are no radiotherapy services in any LMIC islands.

A modelled comparison of prostate cancer control rates after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (3145 multicentre patients) combined with, or in contrast to, external-beam radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyse biochemical relapse-free-survival results for prostate cancer patients receiving combined external beam and high-dose-rate brachytherapy, in comparison with expected results using projections based on dose/fractionation/response parameter values deduced from a previous external-beam-alone 5969-patient multicentre dataset. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Results on a total of 3145 prostate cancer patients receiving brachytherapy (BT) as part or all of their treatment were collected from 10 institutions, and subjected to linear-quadratic (LQ) modelling of dose response and fractionation parameters. RESULTS: Treatments with BT components of less than 25Gy, 3-4 BT fractions, doses per BT fraction up to 6Gy, and treatment times of 3-7weeks, all gave outcomes expected from LQ projections of the external-beam-alone data (α/ß=1.42Gy). However, BT doses higher than 30Gy, 1-2 fractions, 9 fractions (BT alone), doses per fraction of 9-15Gy, and treatment in only 1week (one example), gave local control levels lower than the expected levels by up to ∼35%. CONCLUSIONS: There are various potential causes of the lower-than-projected control levels for some schedules of brachytherapy: it seems plausible that cold spots in the brachytherapy dose distribution may be contributory, and the applicability of the LQ model at high doses per fraction remains somewhat uncertain. The results of further trials may help elucidate the true benefit of hypofractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Normal tissue complications after radiation therapy

This paper describes the biological mechanisms of normal tissue reactions after radiation therapy, with reference to conventional treatments, new treatments, and treatments in developing countries. It also describes biological reasons for the latency period before tissue complications arise, the relationship of dose to incidence, the effect of increasing the size of the irradiated volume, early and late tissue reactions, effects of changes in dose fractionation and dose rate, and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy responses. Examples are given of increases in knowledge of clinical radiobiology from trials of new protocols. Potential modification to treatments include the use of biological response modifiers. The introduction of "response prediction" modifications to treatments might also be available in the near future. Finally, the paper points out that in some radiotherapy centers, the biologically-effective doses prescribed for combined brachytherapy and teletherapy treatment of cervix cancer are lower than those prescribed in other centers. This issue needs to be addressed further. The wealth of preclinical and clinical data has led to a much greater understanding of the biological basis to radiotherapy. This understanding has underpinned a variety of new approaches in radiotherapy, including both physical and biological strategies. There is also the important issue of treatment of a large number of cancers in developing countries, for which efficacious resource-sparing protocols are being continuously developed. A unified scoring system should be widely accepted as the new standard in reporting the adverse effects of radiation therapy. Likewise, late toxicity should be reported on an actuarial basis as a mandatory endpoint.

En este artículo se describen los mecanismos biológicos que intervienen en las reacciones provocadas por la radioterapia, tanto con tratamientos convencionales como con los más nuevos, y los aplicados en países en desarrollo. Asimismo, se describen las bases biológicas del período de latencia que precede a la aparición de las complicaciones tisulares; la relación entre la dosis de radiación y la incidencia de complicaciones; las consecuencias de aumentar el volumen irradiado; las reacciones tisulares tempranas y tardías; los efectos de cambios en el fraccionamiento de las dosis y en las tasas de dosis; y las reacciones observadas al aplicar una combinación de quimioterapia y radioterapia. Se ofrecen ejemplos de nuevos conocimientos en el campo de la radiobiología clínica que se han adquirido mediante ensayos con nuevos protocolos. Entre las posibles modificaciones de los tratamientos figura el uso de modificadores de la respuesta biológica; en el futuro próximo, podría contarse también con modificaciones de los tratamientos para poder "predecir la respuesta". Por último, las dosis cuya eficacia biológica está demostrada y que están prescritas para tratar el cáncer cervicouterino usando una combinación de braquiterapia y teleterapia son menores en algunos centros que en otros, como se explica en este trabajo. El asunto debe examinarse más a fondo. Una gran abundancia de datos de carácter preclínico y clínico ha permitido comprender mucho mejor las bases biológicas de la radioterapia, y ello a su vez ha llevado a una serie de innovaciones en este campo, tanto en forma de estrategias físicas como biológicas. También es importante prestar atención al tratamiento de una gran variedad de cánceres en países en desarrollo, para los cuales continuamente se elaboran protocolos terapéuticos eficaces orientados a ahorrar recursos. Debería adoptarse en todas partes un único sistema de puntuación para documentar los efectos nocivos de la radioterapia. Asimismo, la...

Normal tissue complications after radiation therapy.

This paper describes the biological mechanisms of normal tissue reactions after radiation therapy, with reference to conventional treatments, new treatments, and treatments in developing countries. It also describes biological reasons for the latency period before tissue complications arise, the relationship of dose to incidence, the effect of increasing the size of the irradiated volume, early and late tissue reactions, effects of changes in dose fractionation and dose rate, and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy responses. Examples are given of increases in knowledge of clinical radiobiology from trials of new protocols. Potential modification to treatments include the use of biological response modifiers. The introduction of "response prediction" modifications to treatments might also be available in the near future. Finally, the paper points out that in some radiotherapy centers, the biologically-effective doses prescribed for combined brachytherapy and teletherapy treatment of cervix cancer are lower than those prescribed in other centers. This issue needs to be addressed further. The wealth of preclinical and clinical data has led to a much greater understanding of the biological basis to radiotherapy. This understanding has underpinned a variety of new approaches in radiotherapy, including both physical and biological strategies. There is also the important issue of treatment of a large number of cancers in developing countries, for which efficacious resource-sparing protocols are being continuously developed. A unified scoring system should be widely accepted as the new standard in reporting the adverse effects of radiation therapy. Likewise, late toxicity should be reported on an actuarial basis as a mandatory endpoint.

Overview of radiotherapy resources in Latin America: a survey by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: An analysis of the resources for radiotherapy in Latin America was done to establish a baseline to help plan future development in the region. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data from 19 countries were obtained during three International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) regional meetings. The survey covered radiotherapy centres, major equipment and personnel. The centres were categorised into four different levels. Data were related to economic and population indices. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy centres were identified in 18 countries. Centres were divided into 4 levels: half were included in level 1, 25% in level 2 and 18% in level 0 (stand alone teletherapy machines). Human resource represents 933 radiation oncologists, 357 physicists and 2326 radiation therapy technologists. In general, availability of equipment and personnel was related to economic status of the country. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a shortfall of equipment, the major restriction to patient service is an insufficient number of specialists in 16 of the 18 countries. An upgrade of standards in many centres is required to offer a comprehensive radiation oncology service. The information provided in this paper represents a useful base to plan future development in terms of equipment installation and training programs.