H&N and Skin (HNS) GEC-ESTRO Working Group critical review of recommendations regarding prescription depth, bolus thickness and maximum dose in skin superficial brachytherapy with flaps and customized moulds.

The aim of this publication is the assessment of the existing guidelines for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) superficial brachytherapy (BT) and make a critical review based on the existing literature about the maximum dose prescription depth, bolus thickness and maximum skin surface dose (Dmax) of the published clinical practice. A systematic review of NMSC superficial BT published articles was carried out by the GEC-ESTRO Head & Neck and Skin (HNS) Working Group (WG). 10 members and 2 external reviewers compared the published clinical procedures with the recommendations in the current guidelines and examined the grade of evidence. Our review verified that there is a large variation among centres with regards to clinical practice in superficial BT and identified studies where published parameters such as maximum dose prescription depth, bolus thickness and Dmax exceed the constraints recommended in the guidelines, while showing excellent results in terms of local control, toxicity and cosmesis. This review confirmed that current recommendations on skin superficial BT do not include published experience on tumours treated with superficial BT that require dose prescription depth beyond the recommended 5 mm under the skin surface and that the existing literature does not provide sufficient evidence to relate dosimetry of superficial BT to patient reported outcome measures. The GEC-ESTRO HNS WG considers acceptable to prescribe superficial BT dose at a depth above 5 mm beyond the skin surface, and modify the bolus thickness to optimize the treatment plan and adjust the acceptable maximum dose on the skin surface, all pending clinical situation.

End-to-end dosimetric audit: A novel procedure developed for Irish HDR brachytherapy centres.

PURPOSE: A dosimetric audit of Ir-192 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy remote after-loading units was carried out in 2019. All six brachytherapy departments on the island of Ireland participated in an end-to-end test and in a review of local HDR dosimetry procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D-printed customised phantom was created to position the following detectors at known distances from the HDR source: a Farmer ionization chamber, GafChromic film and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Dedicated HDR applicator needles were used to position an Ir-192 source at 2 cm distance from these detectors. The end-to-end dosimetry audit pathway was performed at each host site and included the stages of imaging, applicator reconstruction, treatment planning and delivery. Deviations between planned and measured dose distributions were quantified using gamma analysis methods. Local procedures were also discussed between auditors and hosts. RESULTS: The mean difference between Reference Air Kerma Rate (RAKR) measured during the audit and RAKR specified by the vendor source certificate was 1.3%. The results of end-to-end tests showed a mean difference between calculated and measured dose of 2.5% with TLDs and less than 0.5% with Farmer chamber measurements. GafChromic films showed a mean gamma passing rates of >95% for plastic and metal applicators with 2%/1 mm global tolerance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this audit indicate dosimetric consistency between centres. The 'end to end' dosimetry audit methodology for HDR brachytherapy has been successfully implemented in a multicentre environment, which included different models of Ir-192 sources and different treatment planning systems. The ability to create a 3D-printed water-equivalent phantom customised to accurately position all three detector types simultaneously at controlled distances from the Ir-192 source under evaluation gives good reproducibility for end-to-end methodology.

A prospective feasibility study of MammoSite accelerated partial breast irradiation for early breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated partial breast irradiation is a potential alternative to standard whole breast irradiation, following breast-conserving surgery, in the management of breast cancer. The MammoSite applicator-based technique allows for the delivery of a higher dose of radiation to the tumour bed and adjacent area, over a shorter treatment period. AIMS: To investigate the long-term feasibility of the MammoSite technique in early stage breast cancer in an Irish cohort. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with early stage breast cancer were enrolled in this prospective study between November 2005 and October 2012 at the University Hospital Galway. A single-entry MammoSite applicator was inserted post-operatively. A CT scan was performed to assess the balloon to skin distance, the conformance of target tissue to balloon surface and balloon symmetry. A total dose of 34 Gy was delivered over 10 fractions twice daily. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10 years. 91.9% (57/62) completed the full course of MammoSite treatment. Technical issues with the MammoSite balloon precluded three patients from completing the full course of treatment. On last follow-up, 6.4% (4/62) of patients had developed an ipsilateral breast recurrence. Half of these recurrences occurred more than 10 years after the initial breast cancer treatment. The most common toxicities observed were fibrosis (67.7%), pain (61.3%) and skin erythema (35.5%). CONCLUSION: The use of the MammoSite technique, as an alternative to standard whole breast irradiation, is feasible in a typical Irish clinical setting with integrated multidisciplinary team input.