Proprioceptive acuity for landmarks on the hand and digits.

Previous work using visually guided reaches to localize landmarks on a hidden hand has suggested that proprioceptive acuity for hand targets is low and representation of hand dimensions is highly distorted (e.g., hand width estimated to be 60% wider than actual hand width). We re-examined these issues using a pure proprioceptive task in which 20 blindfolded subjects reached in a single movement without terminal corrections to touch the right index-tip to landmarks of the left hand placed in various locations in 3D space. Subjects were also tested with vision allowed to estimate minimal errors. Based on previous reports of high proprioceptive acuity for some hand landmarks, we hypothesized that the proprioceptive representation of the hand was much less distorted than described previously and that errors were not correlated with target hand location. Mean distance errors in proprioceptively guided reaches to the landmarks averaged less than 3 cm and were only 0.5-1.3 cm larger than when vision was allowed. Errors were not correlated with hand location in most subjects. Distortions of hand width averaged less than 20% wider than actual width and were not correlated with hand location in most subjects. We conclude that relatively accurate proprioceptive awareness of locations of hand/digit structures and dimensions is available for use in control of hand movements, which are executed largely subconsciously. Studying acuity of proprioception using conscious perceptual tasks and involving vision may not provide accurate measures of proprioceptive acuity as used by the motor system.

High proprioceptive acuity in slow and fast hand movements.

We can accurately reach to touch our index fingertip to various points on the body without vision. Awareness of location/motion of the index fingertip and other body parts through proprioception is required for such movements. Proprioception involves processing sensory information, but it is also debated whether internal model estimates of body state from motor commands improve proprioception. We tested the hypothesis that proprioceptive errors increase with increases in speed of hand movement and whether an internal model contributes to more accurate proprioception, especially in higher speed movements. Ten subjects made voluntary reaching movements with their dominant arm to touch its index-tip to the index-tip of the non-dominant arm that was moved passively or actively at three speeds (slow, comfortable, fast) in various directions. Four conditions required the experimenter to passively move the subject's target arm at slow, comfortable and fast speeds and in different directions. A fifth condition required the subject to actively move both arms to perform the task. Subjects performed these tasks with high accuracy during slow and comfortable speed movements of the target arm. Errors averaged 3.7 mm larger when the target was moved faster and were equivalent to errors for slower movements (p < 0.014). Errors in the active and passive target movement conditions were also equivalent (p < 0.001). These findings show that proprioception is accurate across many different speeds of passive and active target motion and that there was no evidence than an internal model contributes to improved accuracy of proprioception during active movements.