ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The use of psychotropic medications in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been associated with both deleterious and potentially beneficial outcomes. We examined the longitudinal association of psychotropic medication use with cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric symptom (NPS) trajectories among community-ascertained incident AD cases from the Cache County Dementia Progression Study. METHODS: A total of 230 participants were followed for a mean of 3.7 years. Persistency index (PI) was calculated for all antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), antipsychotics (atypical and typical), and benzodiazepines as the proportion of observed time of medication exposure. Mixed-effects models were used to examine the association between PI for each medication class and Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-Sum), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Total (NPI-Total) trajectories, controlling for appropriate demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: At baseline, psychotropic medication use was associated with greater severity of dementia and poorer medical status. Higher PI for all medication classes was associated with a more rapid decline in MMSE. For antidepressant, SSRI, benzodiazepine, and typical antipsychotic use, a higher PI was associated with a more rapid increase in CDR-Sum. For SSRIs, antipsychotics, and typical antipsychotics, a higher PI was associated with more rapid increase in NPI-Total. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic medication use was associated with more rapid cognitive and functional decline in AD, and not with improved NPS. Clinicians may tend to prescribe psychotropic medications to AD patients at risk of poorer outcomes, but one cannot rule out the possibility of poorer outcomes being caused by psychotropic medications.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Cognition/drug effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesABSTRACT
AIM: The prognostic effects of chemotherapy and various lymph node measures [positive nodes, total node count and the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR)] have been established. It is unknown whether the cancer-specific survival benefit of chemotherapy differs across these nodal prognostic categories. METHOD: This retrospective analysis of linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data and Medicare data (SEER-Medicare)included patients ≥ 65 years of age with a diagnosis of stage III colon cancer between 1997 and 2002. We grouped patients according to the number of positive nodes (N1 and N2), total node count (≥ 12 and < 12 total nodes) and PLNR (below the 75th percentile and at least at the 75th percentile of the PLNR). The end point was colon cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-one per cent (3701) of the 7263 patients received adjuvant therapy during the time period 1997-2002. The mean (standard deviation) number of total nodes examined was 13 (9) and the number of positive nodes identified was 3 (3). Patients with N2 disease, < 12 total nodes examined and a high PLNR had a worse survival at 2, 3 and 5 years following colectomy. Utilization of chemotherapy demonstrated a colon cancer-specific survival benefit (hazard ratio at median follow up = 0.7; P < 0.001) that was consistent and statistically significant across the three nodal prognostic categories examined. CONCLUSION: The benefit of chemotherapy did not vary based on N stage, total node count or PLNR. The results favour a broad-based approach towards increasing the chemotherapy treatment rates in stage III patients of ≥ 65 years of age, rather than an approach that targets clinical subgroups.
Subject(s)
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Medicare , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , SEER Program , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine how patient demographics and outpatient referrals to specialized dementia (DEM) or mental health (MH) clinics influence receipt of anti-dementia (AD), antidepressant (ADEP), antipsychotic (APSY) and sedative-hypnotic (SEDH) medications among veterans with dementia. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System (VAMHCS). PARTICIPANTS: Veterans aged ≥ 60 years with Alzheimer's or related dementia diagnosis after 1999 with minimum of one-year follow-up or death were included. MEASUREMENTS: Retrospective analysis of VAMHCS electronic medical records were used to determine predictors of AD, ADEP, APSY, and SEDH prescribing using logistic regression models that examined visits to DEM or MH clinics, patient age, follow-up time, race/ethnicity and marital status. RESULTS: Among 1209 veterans with average follow-up of 3.2 (SD 1.9) years, 36% percent had MH visits, 38% had DEM visits and 19% visited both clinics. DEM visits were associated with AD and ADEP but not APSY medication receipt (OR(AD:DEM) = 1.47, 95% CI = (1.052, 2.051); OR(ADEP:DEM) = 1.66, 95% CI = (1.193, 2.302); OR(APSY:DEM) = 1.35, 95% CI = (0.941, 1.929)). MH visit was associated with ADEP and APSY medication receipt (OR(AD:MH)\ = 1.16, 95% CI = (0.821, 1.631); OR(ADEP:MH) = 2.83, 95% CI = (2.005, 4.005); OR (APSY:MH) = 4.41, 95% CI = (3.109, 6.255)). CONCLUSION: In the VAMHCS dementia population, visits to DEM or MH specialty clinics increase the odds of receiving AD, ADEP, and APSY medications.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/classification , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Dementia/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Veterans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Utilization , Electronic Health Records , Female , Humans , Male , Maryland , Mental Health Services , Middle Aged , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , United States , United States Department of Veterans AffairsABSTRACT
Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is used not only for the short-term control of menopausal symptoms but long-term for disease prevention. This study examined the influence of selected clinical conditions on the use of ERT and the duration of ERT use among women enrolled in a state Medicaid program. We identified 60,531 women, aged >/=45 years, who were enrolled in Maryland Medicaid continuously for at least 2 of 3 years. ERT use was determined through prescription claims submitted for reimbursement. The presence or risk of selected clinical conditions (e.g., osteoporosis, heart disease, estrogen-sensitive cancers) was determined by screening Medicaid claims files for related diagnoses, procedures, or prescription claims. Multiple logistic regression was used to model ERT use, and proportional hazards regression was used to model duration of use. Fourteen percent of these women filled an ERT prescription, with use varying by age, race, and place of residence. Oral dosage forms were the most popular (80.8%), followed by vaginal cream or ring (22.2%), and transdermal patch (7.3%). In adjusted models, osteoporosis, heart disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ovarian cancer, and thromboembolic disease were positively associated and dementia and breast cancer were negatively associated with ERT use. None of these medical conditions predicted the duration of estrogen therapy. Use of ERT was very low among these women despite coverage of prescription medications, and the presence of clinical indications had no influence on the length of therapy among these women despite known benefits for long-term preventive therapy.
Subject(s)
Estrogen Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Health Status , Humans , Logistic Models , Maryland , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess inter- and intrarater reliability among 23 pharmacist and physician retrospective drug utilization reviewers and to assess interrater reliability after a reviewer training session. DESIGN: Exploratory study. SETTING: Maryland Medicaid's retrospective drug utilization review (DUR) program. PARTICIPANTS: 23 physician and pharmacist retrospective drug utilization reviewers. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Profiles rated as "intervention indicated" or "intervention not indicated." Cochran's Q test, overall percent agreement, and the unweighted kappa statistic were used in the analysis of review consistency. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability showed substantial consistency among the 23 reviewers; the percent agreement was 82.9% with kappa = 0.66. Interrater reliability, however, was poor, with an overall agreement of 69.6% and kappa = 0.16. Interrater reliability was also poor after a one-hour reviewer training session (agreement 81.8%, kappa = -0.19). CONCLUSION: The implicit review process used in the retrospective DUR program that we evaluated was unreliable. Since reliability is a necessary but not sufficient condition for validity of an indicator of inappropriate drug use, the validity of the DUR implicit review process is in question.
Subject(s)
Drug Utilization Review/organization & administration , Peer Review , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Humans , Maryland , Medicaid , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , United StatesSubject(s)
Ambulatory Care Information Systems/organization & administration , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems/organization & administration , Drug Utilization Review/organization & administration , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Humans , Medicaid/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Risk Management , United StatesSubject(s)
Drug Therapy/standards , Home Care Services/standards , Quality of Health Care , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
Drug therapy for home care patients, most of whom are elderly, is becoming increasingly complex. In addition, these patients are usually left to their own resources to manage drug therapy. Clinical pharmacy services are therefore a vital component to assuring and maintaining positive therapeutic outcomes in home care. The Visiting Nurse Association (VNA) of Baltimore includes clinical pharmacy in its array of existing home health care services. The VNA system is described and two case studies are presented that illustrate how clinical pharmacy services can directly affect quality of care.