ABSTRACT
In 2000, the new German infectious disease control act replaced aggregate with individual case reporting. The process was facilitated by the simultaneous introduction of electronic data transfer within the public health system. Reporting laboratories have not been electronically connected to this network. A survey by means of a postal questionnaire was conducted in 2003 among 537 German medical microbiology laboratories to explore their reporting habits, preference for electronic reporting formats, and relevant software equipment. Almost 90% of the respondents indicated a reporting delay of no more than 24 hours and 45% were still manually filling in paper forms for reporting purposes. The introduction of electronic reporting formats was favoured by 74% of the laboratories although 33% were not using any microbiology-specific software and the remaining 67% listed 62 different products. Pilot projects with selected software manufacturers might help to pave the way for the implementation of a standardised electronic infectious disease reporting format in Germany.
Subject(s)
Disease Notification/statistics & numerical data , Disease Notification/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Laboratories/statistics & numerical data , Laboratories/standards , Mandatory Reporting , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Laboratory Information Systems , Disease Notification/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany/epidemiology , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Laboratories/legislation & jurisprudence , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
In 2000, the new German infectious disease control act replaced aggregate with individual case reporting. The process was facilitated by the simultaneous introduction of electronic data transfer within the public health system. Reporting laboratories have not been electronically connected to this network. A survey by means of a postal questionnaire was conducted in 2003 among 537 German medical microbiology laboratories to explore their reporting habits, preference for electronic reporting formats, and relevant software equipment. Almost 90% of the respondents indicated a reporting delay of no more than 24 hours and 45% were still manually filling in paper forms for reporting purposes. The introduction of electronic reporting formats was favoured by 74% of the laboratories although 33% were not using any microbiology-specific software and the remaining 67% listed 62 different products. Pilot projects with selected software manufacturers might help to pave the way for the implementation of a standardised electronic infectious disease reporting format in Germany.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Due to insufficient vaccination rates, measles outbreaks still pose a threat to public health in Germany. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for undervaccination against measles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Datasets from two cross-sectional surveys were analyzed by logistic regression models. The surveys had been done prior to and after an intervention aiming to raise measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination rates among children entering primary school in five Bavarian counties. Subjects were 9,582 children aged 6 to 7 years and their parents. RESULTS: Main independent predictors of non-immunization were doctors advising against vaccination (OR 84.8; 95% CI 19.9-360.4), doctors abstaining from advice (OR 6.3; 95% CI 4.8-8.4), and parental reservations due to alternative health beliefs (OR 27.9; 95% CI 17.6-44.1). CONCLUSION: Doctors advising against measles vaccination and doctors not giving any advice proved to be important risk factors for childhood undervaccination against measles. Future strategies to increase measles vaccination rates in Germany should focus more on family doctors.
