ABSTRACT
The scaling of Option B+ services, whereby all pregnant women who test HIV positive are started on lifelong antiretroviral therapy upon diagnosis regardless of CD4 T-cell count, is ongoing in many high HIV burden, low-resource countries. We developed and evaluated a tablet-based mobile learning (mLearning) training approach to build Option B+ competencies in frontline nurses in central Mozambique. Its acceptability and impact on clinical skills were assessed in maternal child health nurses and managers at 20 intervention and 10 control clinics. Results show that skill and knowledge of nurses at intervention clinics improved threefold compared with control clinics (p = .04), nurse managers at intervention clinics demonstrated a 9- to 10-fold improvement, and nurses reported strong acceptance of this approach. "mLearning" is one viable modality to enhance nurses' clinical competencies in areas with limited health workforce and training budgets. This study's findings may guide future scaling and investments in commercially viable mLearning solutions.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Nurses, Male , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Rural Population , Urban Population , Clinical Competence , Health Personnel , MozambiqueABSTRACT
The scaling of Option B+ services, whereby all pregnant women who test HIV positive are started on lifelong antiretroviral therapy upon diagnosis regardless of CD4 T-cell count, is ongoing in many high HIV burden, low-resource countries. We developed and evaluated a tablet-based mobile learning (mLearning) training approach to build Option B+ competencies in frontline nurses in central Mozambique. Its acceptability and impact on clinical skills were assessed in maternal child health nurses and managers at 20 intervention and 10 control clinics. Results show that skill and knowledge of nurses at intervention clinics improved threefold compared with control clinics (p = .04), nurse managers at intervention clinics demonstrated a 9- to 10-fold improvement, and nurses reported strong acceptance of this approach. "mLearning" is one viable modality to enhance nurses' clinical competencies in areas with limited health workforce and training budgets. This study's findings may guide future scaling and investments in commercially viable mLearning solutions.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Cell Phone , Clinical Competence , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Health Personnel/education , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Inservice Training/methods , Nurses/psychology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Learning , Mobile Applications , Mozambique , Pregnancy , Rural Population , Urban PopulationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite large investments to prevent mother-to-child-transmission (PMTCT), pediatric HIV elimination goals are not on track in many countries. The Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA) study was a cluster randomized trial to test whether a package of systems engineering tools could strengthen PMTCT programs. We sought to (1) define core and adaptable components of the SAIA intervention, and (2) explain the heterogeneity in SAIA's success between facilities. METHODS: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided all data collection efforts. CFIR constructs were assessed in focus group discussions and interviews with study and facility staff in 6 health facilities (1 high-performing and 1 low-performing site per country, identified by study staff) in December 2014 at the end of the intervention period. SAIA staff identified the intervention's core and adaptable components at an end-of-study meeting in August 2015. Two independent analysts used CFIR constructs to code transcripts before reaching consensus. RESULTS: Flow mapping and continuous quality improvement were the core to the SAIA in all settings, whereas the PMTCT cascade analysis tool was the core in high HIV prevalence settings. Five CFIR constructs distinguished strongly between high and low performers: 2 in inner setting (networks and communication, available resources) and 3 in process (external change agents, executing, reflecting and evaluating). DISCUSSION: The CFIR is a valuable tool to categorize elements of an intervention as core versus adaptable, and to understand heterogeneity in study implementation. Future intervention studies should apply evidence-based implementation science frameworks, like the CFIR, to provide salient data to expand implementation to other settings.
