Wound healing and hernia after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - Onlay self-gripping polyester mesh reinforcement compared with small bite sutured closure.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic mesh implantation following open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a debatable subject. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a self-gripping polyester mesh used in on-lay technique to prevent incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 495 patients who underwent aortic surgery between May 2017 and May 2021. Patients included in the study underwent open surgical repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with closure of the abdominal wall with either small bite suture technique or prophylactic mesh reinforcement. Primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of incisional hernia during a two-year follow-up period. Secondary endpoints were mesh-related complications. RESULTS: Mesh implantation with the on-lay technique was successful in all cases. No patient in the mesh group developed an incisional hernia during the 24-month follow-up period. Two patients in the non-mesh group developed a symptomatic incisional hernia during the follow-up period at 6 months. Three cases of post-operative access site complications were observed in the mesh group. CONCLUSIONS: Application of a self-gripping polyester mesh using the on-lay technique demonstrates acceptable early-durability after open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, it appears to be associated with a number of post-operative access site complications.

A prospective randomised, open-labeled, trial comparing sirolimus-containing versus mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The potential anti-cancer effects of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are being intensively studied. To date, however, few randomised clinical trials (RCT) have been performed to demonstrate anti-neoplastic effects in the pure oncology setting, and at present, no oncology endpoint-directed RCT has been reported in the high-malignancy risk population of immunosuppressed transplant recipients. Interestingly, since mTOR inhibitors have both immunosuppressive and anti-cancer effects, they have the potential to simultaneously protect against immunologic graft loss and tumour development. Therefore, we designed a prospective RCT to determine if the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus can improve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-free patient survival in liver transplant (LT) recipients with a pre-transplant diagnosis of HCC. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is an open-labelled, randomised, RCT comparing sirolimus-containing versus mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in patients undergoing LT for HCC. Patients with a histologically confirmed HCC diagnosis are randomised into 2 groups within 4-6 weeks after LT; one arm is maintained on a centre-specific mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppressive protocol and the second arm is maintained on a centre-specific mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppressive protocol for the first 4-6 weeks, at which time sirolimus is initiated. A 21/2 -year recruitment phase is planned with a 5-year follow-up, testing HCC-free survival as the primary endpoint. Our hypothesis is that sirolimus use in the second arm of the study will improve HCC-free survival. The study is a non-commercial investigator-initiated trial (IIT) sponsored by the University Hospital Regensburg and is endorsed by the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association; 13 countries within Europe, Canada and Australia are participating. DISCUSSION: If our hypothesis is correct that mTOR inhibition can reduce HCC tumour growth while simultaneously providing immunosuppression to protect the liver allograft from rejection, patients should experience less post-transplant problems with HCC recurrence, and therefore could expect a longer and better quality of life. A positive outcome will likely change the standard of posttransplant immunosuppressive care for LT patients with HCC. TRIAL REGISTER: Trial registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00355862(EudraCT Number: 2005-005362-36).

Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: The role of adjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer is still uncertain, and no recommended standard exists. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine administered after complete resection of pancreatic cancer improves disease-free survival by 6 months or more. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Open, multicenter, randomized controlled phase 3 trial with stratification for resection, tumor, and node status. Conducted from July 1998 to December 2004 in the outpatient setting at 88 academic and community-based oncology centers in Germany and Austria. A total of 368 patients with gross complete (R0 or R1) resection of pancreatic cancer and no prior radiation or chemotherapy were enrolled into 2 groups. INTERVENTION: Patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with 6 cycles of gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (n = 179), or observation ([control] n = 175). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was disease-free survival, and secondary end points were overall survival, toxicity, and quality of life. Survival analysis was based on all eligible patients (intention-to-treat). RESULTS: More than 80% of patients had R0 resection. The median number of chemotherapy cycles in the gemcitabine group was 6 (range, 0-6). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities rarely occurred with no difference in quality of life (by Spitzer index) between groups. During median follow-up of 53 months, 133 patients (74%) in the gemcitabine group and 161 patients (92%) in the control group developed recurrent disease. Median disease-free survival was 13.4 months in the gemcitabine group (95% confidence interval, 11.4-15.3) and 6.9 months in the control group (95% confidence interval, 6.1-7.8; P<.001, log-rank). Estimated disease-free survival at 3 and 5 years was 23.5% and 16.5% in the gemcitabine group, and 7.5% and 5.5% in the control group, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the effect of gemcitabine on disease-free survival was significant in patients with either R0 or R1 resection. There was no difference in overall survival between the gemcitabine group (median, 22.1 months; 95% confidence interval, 18.4-25.8; estimated survival, 34% at 3 years and 22.5% at 5 years) and the control group (median, 20.2 months; 95% confidence interval, 17-23.4; estimated survival, 20.5% at 3 years and 11.5% at 5 years; P = .06, log-rank). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative gemcitabine significantly delayed the development of recurrent disease after complete resection of pancreatic cancer compared with observation alone. These results support the use of gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable carcinoma of the pancreas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN34802808.

Development of de novo cancer in p53 knock-out mice is dependent on the type of long-term immunosuppression used.

BACKGROUND: Development of cancer in transplant recipients may be influenced by different immunosuppressive agents. Recent publications suggest that rapamycin (RAPA), or possibly mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), may reduce established tumor growth; however, experimental data is lacking for de novo cancer prevention. METHODS: We tested the effects of long-term immunosuppression on spontaneous tumor formation in p53 knock-out mice. Mice received no treatment, or were given RAPA, MMF, or cyclosporine (CsA) starting on week nine after birth, with the experimental endpoint being week 29. RESULTS: All (9/9) untreated mice developed clinically evident tumors before week 26, as confirmed by histology (6 lymphomas, 2 sarcomas, 1 lymphoma+sarcoma). All CsA-treated mice (9/9) also developed clinical tumors before the endpoint (7 lymphomas, 1 sarcoma, 1 lymphoma+sarcoma). With MMF, 7/10 mice showed clinical evidence of tumor before the experimental endpoint (4 lymphomas, 2 sarcomas, 1 lymphoma+sarcoma), however, histologic tissue analysis revealed that the remaining three mice had subclinical cancer (3 lymphomas). In contrast, RAPA treatment resulted in only three mice with clinical tumors (all lymphomas), with histology revealing subclinical lymphomas in three additional mice, but no evidence of cancer in four animals. Statistically, cancer development was decreased with RAPA treatment (P=0.002), but was not affected with either MMF or CsA (P>0.10). CONCLUSION: These experiments are the first to show immunosuppression under RAPA can reduce spontaneous de novo cancer associated with p53 mutations. Although neither CsA nor MMF treatment affects p53-associated tumor incidence, MMF may have some tendency to reduce clinical tumor appearance.

Plasma disappearance of indocyanine green: a marker for excretory liver function?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green (ICG) assessed using a commercially available bedside monitor provides an accurate estimation of cumulative biliary ICG excretion in a clinically relevant model of long-term, hyperdynamic porcine endotoxemia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective experimental study in the animal laboratory in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Fifteen domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Pigs were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented. Intravenous endotoxin was continuously infused over 12 h concomitant with fluid resuscitation. Measurements were performed before and 12 h after the start of endotoxin infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: All animals developed hyperdynamic circulation characterized by a sustained increase in cardiac output. Despite well maintained portal venous and consequently total liver blood flow endotoxemia decreased hepatic lactate uptake, which was accompanied by a significant fall in portal and hepatic venous pH. Both the cumulative bile flow and biliary ICG and bicarbonate excretion measured during 1 h after intravenous bolus of 25 mg ICG fell significantly. By contrast, neither the plasma disappearance rate of ICG nor the rate corrected for liver blood flow exhibited any changes over time. CONCLUSIONS: In hyperdynamic porcine endotoxemia the plasma disappearance rate of ICG failed to accurately substitute for direct short-term measures of biliary ICG excretion. Hence normal values of plasma disappearance rate of ICG should be interpreted with caution in early, acute inflammatory conditions.

Use of an adenoviral vector to express soluble donor-major histocompatibility complex molecules capable of suppressing the immune response in rat transplant recipients.

There is an accumulating body of evidence indicating that soluble major histocompatibility complex (sMHC) molecules have donor-specific immunosuppressive properties. One classic, but still unproven, theory is that production of sMHC by liver transplants induces a potent immunosuppressive effect. To mimic this possible effect, we have developed a replication deficient adenovirus (Ad-RQ) to express high levels of donor sMHC class I molecules (sRT1.A(a)) in the liver. Ad-RQ produced sRT1.A(a) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) after in vitro infection of Lewis (RT1(l)) hepatocytes, and in vivo following intravenous virus injection into Lewis rats. Results indicated high sRT1.A(a) expression in Lewis hepatocyte cultures and, in vivo, high expression was also demonstrated and maintained for at least 1 week. A strong immunosuppressive potential of sMHC in vivo was revealed by prolongation of cardiac (ACI, RT1(a)) heart allograft survival in high-responder Lewis rat recipients treated with Ad-RQ alone. Furthermore, limiting dilution cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursor (CTLp) analysis of lymphocytes from Ad-RQ-treated Lewis recipients receiving an ACI heart transplant indicated a marked decrease in antidonor CTLp frequency. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that viral vectors can be used effectively to express high levels of sMHC molecules, and their immunosuppressive effect, without concurrent immunosuppression, is sufficiently potent to prolong heart transplant survival.

Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor.

Conventional immunosuppressive drugs have been used effectively to prevent immunologic rejection in organ transplantation. Individuals taking these drugs are at risk, however, for the development and recurrence of cancer. In the present study we show that the new immunosuppressive drug rapamycin (RAPA) may reduce the risk of cancer development while simultaneously providing effective immunosuppression. Experimentally, RAPA inhibited metastatic tumor growth and angiogenesis in in vivo mouse models. In addition, normal immunosuppressive doses of RAPA effectively controlled the growth of established tumors. In contrast, the most widely recognized immunosuppressive drug, cyclosporine, promoted tumor growth. From a mechanistic perspective, RAPA showed antiangiogenic activities linked to a decrease in production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and to a markedly inhibited response of vascular endothelial cells to stimulation by VEGF. Thus, the use of RAPA, instead of cyclosporine, may reduce the chance of recurrent or de novo cancer in high-risk transplant patients.