New protocol in the treatment of Peyronie's disease by combining platelet-rich plasma, percutaneous needle tunneling, and penile modeling: Preliminary results.

INTRODUCTION: Intra-lesional injections of collagenase (Xiapex®) were the only non-invasive treatment option for Peyronie's disease (PD), until their withdrawal from the European market. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a combined treatment of percutaneous needle tunnelling (PNT) with penile modelling (PM) and the injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) under general anesthesia in the treatment of PD. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A prospective case series study included patients with PD in a stable phase who underwent this procedure between March 2020 and January 2023. The main outcome was an improvement in curvature. RESULT: Thirty-six patients underwent this novel approach for the treatment of PD. The pretreatment mean±standard deviation (SD) curvature degree was 57.5±20.61° (range 20-90°). After the protocol, the mean curvature degree was 40.86±25.13° (range 0-90°). The curvature angle improved significantly (P=0.0001), with a mean improvement difference of 16.85±14.81° (range 0-50°) and a mean improvement percentage of 47.7±40.29% (range 0-100%). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience suggests that PNT and PRP injections with PM are effective and safe for the treatment of penile deformity of PD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4: case series study.

Incidence and risk factors for urolithiasis recurrence after endourological management of kidney stones: A retrospective single-centre study.

INTRODUCTION: Almost half of the patients have had recurrent nephrolithiasis despite undergoing effective treatment. Our objective is to determine the recurrence rate of lithiasis after endourological management of nephrolithiasis and identify the risk factors for these recurrences. METHODS: Data were gathered retrospectively from all patients who were treated for nephrolithiasis by endourological management from May 2014 to January 2017 in our university hospital. The patients were devised into two groups: with and without recurrence. Many variables were also compared between these two groups. RESULTS: During this period 265 patients were treated for upper urinary tract stone. A total of 190 patients were included in the study. The median age and median BMI of the patients were 57.5 years and 25.2kg/m2, respectively. A biochemical analysis of the stones was performed in 117 (61.5%) patients. The most common types of stones were calcium oxalate monohydrate stones (n=44, 23.2%), mixed stones (n=39, 20.5%) including mixed calcium oxalate (n=10; 8.5%), calcium oxalate dihydrate stones (n=13, 6.8%) and uric acid stones (n=11, 5.8%). At the end of a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 13-61 monthes), 49 patients (25.8%) had a recurrent stone. In univariate analysis, the risk factors for recurrence were BMI greater than 25kg/m2 (HR: 2; P<0.05), diabetes (HR: 3.73; P<0.008) and smoking (HR: 3.1; P<0.039). However age (HR: 0.96: P<0.003) and high blood pressure (HR: 0.37; P<0.027) were protective factors. In multivariate analysis, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and age are still risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSION: Stone recurrence is common after the management of urinary stones. In this study 25.8% of patients had recurred stone disease after endourological management with a median follow-up of 32 months. Our study findings showed that diabetes and smoking are risk factors for recurrence, while age and blood hypertension are protective factors that decreased the risk of recurrence.

Renal Tumor Biopsy: Rationale to Avoid Surgery in Small Renal Masses.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The use of renal tumor biopsy (RTB) for small renal masses (SRMs) in daily practice, although safe and accurate, is unusual. Considering the large number of benign tumors in patients with renal masses < 4 cm, some patients with benign tumors are directly referred for surgery instead. This study aimed to report the diagnostic rates of RTB, determine the concordance with surgical pathology, and assess the number of procedures that could have been avoided. We retrospectively studied 255 patients who underwent RTB at our institution in 2010-2019. Of them, 73 were excluded from the analysis (exclusion criteria: > 4 cm, cystic lesion, missing data). The remaining 182 with undetermined SRMs ≤ 4 cm underwent RTB under computed tomography guidance. RECENT FINDINGS: Biopsies were diagnostic in 154/182 (84.6%) cases. Of the non-diagnostic biopsies, 11 were diagnostic when repeated. When RTB was performed of all undetermined SRMs, active treatment (surgery or cryotherapy) was avoided in 50/182 patients (27.5%) because of a benign diagnosis, while 9/182 patients (4.9%) underwent surveillance after a shared multidisciplinary decision. The overall diagnostic rate was 90.6%. All adverse events (approximately 4%) were Clavien-Dindo grade I and did not require active treatment. RTB histology results and nuclear grade were highly concordant with the final pathology (96% and 86.6%, respectively). On univariate logistic regression analysis, male sex was the only contributing factor of diagnostic biopsy. RTB of SRMs should be performed more frequently as part of a multidisciplinary decision-making process since it avoided unnecessary surgical treatment in 1 of 3 patients in our institution.

Reasons for intravesical instillation postponement during adjuvant treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Intravesical instillations for adjuvant treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) may be postponed of necessity. However, the frequency and reasons for postponement are unclear. MATERIALS: We carried out a prospective, epidemiological study in an Urology department of the Île-de-France, between August 2016 and March 2017, to determine the frequency and reasons for postponement of intravesical instillations during adjuvant treatment of NMIBC. One-hundred consecutive patients treated by intravesical instillations of mitomycin C (MMC) or Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) were included. At each session and in case of instillation postponement, the medical team completed a specially designed questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 541 instillations were performed in the 100 patients. Twenty-four instillations (4.4%) were postponed in 19 patients. The major cause of postponement was an untreated positive urine analysis and culture (UAC) in 13/24 (54%) cases. The causes of cancellation did not differ significantly between MMC and BCG. The most frequently cancelled instillations were the first in the therapeutic protocol in 26% of cases. The number of instillations preceding those cancelled did not differ significantly between MMC and BCG (2.1±2.0 instillations for MMC vs. 1.5±1.6 for BCG; P=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: There was a low rate of postponed instillations (4.4%). The main reasons, namely an untreated UAC and a positive dipstick test, based on the jurisprudence, are not included in the latest CC-AFU guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.