Plasma pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (NSC 330507) in CD2F1 mice1.

PURPOSE: 17-(Allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG) is a benzoquinone ansamycin compound agent that has entered clinical trials. Studies were performed in mice to: (1) define the plasma pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, and urinary excretion of 17AAG after i.v. delivery; (2) to define the bioavailability of 17AAG after i.p. and oral delivery; and (3) to characterize the concentrations of 17AAG metabolites in plasma and tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All studies were performed in female CD2F1 mice. Preliminary toxicity studies used 17AAG i.v. bolus doses of 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg. Pharmacokinetic studies used i.v. 17AAG doses of 60, 40, and 26.67 mg/kg and i.p. and oral doses of 40 mg/kg. The plasma concentration versus time data were analyzed by compartmental and noncompartmental methods. The concentrations of 17AAG were also determined in brain, heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, skeletal muscle, and fat. Urinary drug excretion was calculated until 24 h after treatment. RESULTS: A 60 mg/kg dose of 17AAG, in its initial, microdispersed formulation, caused no changes in appearance, appetite, waste elimination, or survival of treated animals as compared to vehicle-treated controls. Bolus i.v. delivery of 60 mg/kg microdispersed 17AAG produced "peak" plasma 17AAG concentrations between 5.8 and 19.3 micrograms/ml in mice killed 5 min after injection. Sequential reduction of the 17AAG dose to 40 and 26.67 mg/kg resulted in "peak" plasma 17AAG concentrations between 8.9 and 19.0 micrograms/ml, and 4.8 and 6.1 micrograms/ml, respectively. Noncompartmental analysis of the plasma 17AAG concentration versus time data showed an increase in AUC from 402 to 625 and 1738 micrograms/ml.min when the 17AAG dose increased from 26.67 to 40 and 60 mg/kg, respectively. Across the range of doses studied, 17AAG total body clearance varied from 34 to 66 ml/min per kg. Compartmental modeling of the plasma 17AAG concentration versus time data showed that the data were fitted best by a two-compartment, open, linear model. In each study, substantial concentrations of a material, subsequently identified as 17-(amino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AG), were measured in plasma. A subsequent, lyophilized formulation of 17AAG proved excessively toxic when delivered i.v. at 60 mg/kg. A repeat i.v. study using a 40 mg/kg dose of this new formulation produced peak plasma 17AAG concentrations of 20.2-38.4 micrograms/ml, and a 17AAG AUC of 912 micrograms/ml.min, which was approximately 50% greater than the AUC produced by a 40 mg/kg dose of microdispersed 17AAG. The bioavailabilities of 17AAG after i.p. and oral delivery were 99% and 24%, respectively. Minimal amounts of 17AAG and 17AG were detected in the urine. After i.v. bolus delivery to mice, 17AAG distributed rapidly to all tissues, except the brain. Substantial concentrations of 17AG were measured in each tissue. CONCLUSIONS: 17AAG has excellent bioavailability when given i.p. but only modest bioavailability when given orally and is metabolized to 17AG and other metabolites when given i.v., i.p., or orally. 17AAG is widely distributed to tissues. These pharmacokinetic data generated have proven relevant to the design of recently initiated clinical trials of 17AAG and could be useful in their interpretation.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of novobiocin in combination with VP-16 in patients with refractory malignancies.

PURPOSE: The coumarin antibiotic novobiocin potentiates the activity of etoposide (VP-16) in vitro by increasing intracellular accumulation of VP-16. The drug efflux pump inhibited by novobiocin appears to be distinct from both of the major proteins associated with the multidrug resistance phenotype in human cancers, the 170-kDa P-glycoprotein and the 190-kDa multidrug resistance protein. In a recent study, we found that novobiocin augmented VP-16 accumulation ex vivo in 16 of 24 fresh tumor samples at concentrations that could be achieved in vivo. Therefore, we conducted a clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the pharmacokinetics of novobiocin when given in combination with VP-16. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory cancer were treated with VP-16 on days 1, 3, and 5. Antiemetics, consisting of ondansetron and dexamethasone, were given 60 minutes before the VP-16 was administered. Novobiocin was given orally 30 minutes before the VP-16, and the dose was escalated in successive groups of patients according to a standard dose escalation design. Treatment cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Plasma concentrations of novobiocin were determined during the first treatment cycle by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were treated for a total of 69 cycles. Eleven patients were treated with a starting dose of VP-16 of 120 mg/m2, and three of these patients experienced neutropenic fever. The dose of VP-16 was reduced to 100 mg/m2, and an additional 22 patients were enrolled. The dose of novobiocin ranged from 3 to 9 g. At a novobiocin dose of at least 5.5 g, plasma concentrations of at least 150 microM were sustained for 24 hours. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of neutropenic fever and reversible hyperbilirubinemia. Nausea, which was a limiting toxicity in other trials of novobiocin, was well controlled with the use of serotonergic antiemetics. Diarrhea was common but mild in most patients. DISCUSSION: In previously treated patients, the recommended dose of novobiocin in this schedule is 7 g/m2/day. Novobiocin does not appear to augment the toxicity of VP-16 to the bone marrow or the gastrointestinal mucosa. Plasma concentrations of novobiocin equivalent to the levels required to modulate VP-16 in vitro are readily achievable for total but not unbound free drug.

Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine in a patient with ascites.

Gemcitabine (dFdC) is a prodrug that undergoes metabolism by cytidine deaminase to form an inactive metabolite, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU). The pharmacokinetics of dFdC and dFdU have been studied; however, their disposition has never been evaluated in a patient with ascites. A patient with pancreatic cancer and malignant ascites was treated with dFdC 1,500 mg/m2 over 150 minutes weekly for 3 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. Serial plasma and ascites samples were obtained on weeks 1 and 2 of cycle 2. High-pressure liquid chromatography was used to quantify dFdC and dFdU in plasma and ascites. The systemic dispositions of dFdC and dFdU were similar to those reported in patients without ascites. The concentration of dFdC in ascites approached 1 mg/ml. Ascitic fluid did not serve as a depot for dFdC, and the agent's concentration in ascites approached that at which its phosphorylation is saturated.

Phase I study of paclitaxel in combination with a multidrug resistance modulator, PSC 833 (Valspodar), in refractory malignancies.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel when given with PSC 833 (valspodar) to patients with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were initially treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) over 3 hours. Subsequently, 29 hours of treatment with CIVI PSC 833 was started 2 hours before paclitaxel treatment was initiated. In this combination, the starting dose of paclitaxel was 52.5 mg/m(2). Paclitaxel doses were escalated by 17.5 mg/m(2) increments for four subsequent cohorts. Each cohort consisted of three patients with the exception of the last cohort, which consisted of six patients. Data for the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel with and without concurrent PSC 833 administration were obtained. RESULTS: All 18 patients completed at least one course of concurrent treatment (median, two courses; range, one to six) and were evaluable for toxicity. The MTD for paclitaxel with PSC 833 was 122.5 mg/m(2). Neutropenia was the DLT. All patients had PSC 833 blood concentrations greater than 1, 000 ng/mL before, during, and 24 hours after the paclitaxel infusion. PSC 833 produced small increases in the paclitaxel peak plasma concentrations and areas under the concentration-time curve. However, PSC 833 greatly prolonged the terminal phase of paclitaxel, resulting in plasma paclitaxel concentrations of more than 0.05 micromol/L for much longer than expected. As a result, myelosuppression was comparable to that produced by full-dose paclitaxel given without PSC 833. Of the 16 patients who were assessable for response, one patient experienced a partial response and an additional nine patients experienced disease stabilization after paclitaxel treatment alone. CONCLUSION: Treatment with paclitaxel 122.5 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour CIVI concurrent with a 29-hour CIVI of PSC 833 results in acceptable toxicity. The addition of PSC 833 alters the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, which explains the enhanced neutropenia experienced by patients treated with this drug combination.

Delayed administration of sodium thiosulfate in animal models reduces platinum ototoxicity without reduction of antitumor activity.

Platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents, such as carboplatin and cisplatin, are effective against many human tumors, but their use may be limited by a high incidence of ototoxicity. Delayed administration of the chemoprotective agent sodium thiosulfate (STS) reduces the ototoxicity of carboplatin in a guinea-pig model, when given up to 8 h after the chemotherapy, and also reduces hearing loss in patients given carboplatin with osmotic blood-brain barrier opening for treatment of brain tumors. We tested whether STS, given at times that achieved otoprotection, could impact the chemotherapeutic efficacy of carboplatin. The impact of STS was evaluated by measuring the onset of growth of LX-1 human small cell lung carcinoma s.c. xenografts in the nude rat. When STS was administered as two boluses, 2 and 6 h after treatment with carboplatin and etoposide, there was a decrease in the time to tumor progression. In contrast, when STS administration was delayed until 8 h after carboplatin/etoposide, there was no reduction in the antitumor cytotoxicity of the chemotherapy. STS infusion did not significantly affect ultrafilterable platinum pharmacokinetics in the guinea pig. To explore the potential wider applicability of STS, in a pilot study we tested its efficacy against cisplatin ototoxicity. Delayed administration of STS, 2 h after cisplatin, was protective against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in the guinea pig model, as determined by electrophysiological measures. On the basis of these data, we suggest that delayed administration of STS may provide a mechanism to reduce the ototoxicity caused by administration of carboplatin or cisplatin for both central nervous system and systemic cancer chemotherapy.

Plasma pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution in CD2F1 mice of Pc4 (NSC 676418), a silicone phthalocyanine photodynamic sensitizing agent.

PURPOSE: Pc4 is a silicone phthalocyanine photosensitizing agent that is entering clinical trials. Studies were undertaken in mice to develop a suitable formulation and analytical methodology for use in pharmacokinetic studies and to define the plasma pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, and urinary excretion of Pc4 after i.v. delivery. METHODS: An HPLC method suitable for separation and quantification of Pc4 was developed and validated for use in mouse plasma, tissues, and urine. The stability of Pc4 was characterized in a variety of formulations as well as in mouse plasma. Before pursuing pharmacokinetic studies, preliminary toxicity studies were undertaken. These studies utilized Pc4 formulated in diluent 12:0. 154 M NaCl (1:3, v:v). Pharmacokinetic studies involved Pc4 doses of 40 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg administered as i.v. boluses to female, CD2F1 mice. Doses of 40 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 2 mg/kg were studied with drug formulated in diluent 12:0.154 M NaCl (1:3, v:v). Doses of 10 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg were also studied with drug formulated in a vehicle consisting of polyethylene glycol:Tween 80:0. 01 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 (40:0.2:59.8, v:v:v). Compartmental and non-compartmental analyses were applied to the plasma concentration-versus-time data. Concentrations of Pc4 were also determined in a variety of tissues, including brain, lung, liver, kidney, skeletal muscle, skin, heart, spleen, and abdominal fat. Urine was collected from animals treated with each of the doses of Pc4 mentioned above, and daily, as well as cumulative drug excretion was calculated until 168 h after treatment. RESULTS: At a dose of 80 mg/kg, two of five male and two of five female mice were dead by 24 h after injection. Pathologic examination revealed gross findings of blue discoloration affecting many tissues, with lungs that were grossly hemorrhagic and very blue-black. Microscopic examination of the lungs revealed mild acute interstitial pneumonia, with perivascular edema and inflammation, and a detectable margination of neutrophils around larger pulmonary blood vessels. Animals sacrificed 14 days after treatment showed mild granulomatous pneumonia, characterized by clusters of multi-nucleated giant cells, with fewer macrophages and neutrophils. The giant cells frequently contained phagocytized particles, which were clear and relatively fusiform. All mice treated with 40 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg survived and returned to pretreatment weight during the 14 days after treatment. Intravenous bolus delivery of Pc4, at a dose of 40 mg/kg, produced "peak" plasma Pc4 concentrations between 7.81 and 8.92 microg/ml in mice killed at 5 min after injection (the earliest time studied after drug delivery). Sequential reduction of the Pc4 dose to 10 mg/kg in diluent 12:0.154 M NaCl (1:3, v:v), 10 mg/kg in polyethylene glycol:Tween 80:sodium phosphate buffer (40:0.2:59.8, v:v:v), 2 mg/kg in diluent 12:0.154 M NaCl (1:3, v:v), and, finally, 2 mg/kg in polyethylene glycol:Tween 80:sodium phosphate buffer (40:0.2:59.8, v:v:v) resulted in "peak" plasma Pc4 concentrations between 2.07 and 3.24, 0.68 and 0.98 microg/ml, and 0.29 and 0.41 microg/ml, respectively. Pc4 persisted in plasma for prolonged periods of time (72-168 h). Non-compartmental analysis of plasma Pc4 concentration-versus-time data showed an increase in area under the plasma Pc4 concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) when the dose of Pc4 increased from 2 mg/kg to 40 mg/kg. Across the 20-fold range of doses studied, total body clearance (CL(tb)) varied from 376 to 1106 ml h(-1) kg(-1). Compartmental modeling of plasma Pc4 concentration versus time data showed the data to be fit best by a two-compartment, open, linear model. Minimal amounts of Pc4 were detected in the urine of mice. After i.v. bolus delivery to mice, Pc4 distributed rapidly to all tissues and persisted in most tissues for the duration of each pharmacokinetic study. Tissue exposure, as measured by AUC, increased in a dose-dependent fash

Phase I trial, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlations, of combination paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of paclitaxel with carboplatin with and without filgrastim support in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to investigate the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and carboplatin and correlate these with the pharmacodynamic effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC were entered into this phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study. Paclitaxel was initially administered as a 24-hour infusion at a fixed dose of 135 mg/m2, and the carboplatin dose was escalated in cohorts of three patients, using Calvert's formula [dose(mg) = area under the concentration time curve (glomerular filtration rate + 25)], to target areas under the concentration time curve (AUCs) of 5, 7, 9, and 11 mg/mL x minute. A measured 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance was substituted for the glomerular filtration rate. Once the maximum-tolerated AUC (MTAUC) of carboplatin was reached, the paclitaxel dose was escalated to 175, 200, and 225 mg/m2. When the paclitaxel dose escalation began, the AUC of carboplatin was reduced to one level below the MTAUC. RESULTS: Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity. Thrombocytopenia was observed at a carboplatin AUC of 11 mg/mL x minute after course 2 and thereafter. End-of-infusion plasma paclitaxel concentrations and median duration of time above 0.05 microM were similar in course 1 versus course 2 at the 135 and 175 mg/m2 dose levels. The neutropenia experienced by patients was consistent with that observed in patients who had received paclitaxel alone. Measured carboplatin AUCs were approximately 12% (20% v 3% with course 1 v course 2, respectively) below the desired target, with a standard deviation of 34% at all dose levels. A sigmoid-maximum effect model describing the relationship between relative thrombocytopenia and measured free platinum exposure indicated that patients who received the combination of carboplatin with paclitaxel experienced less severe thrombocytopenia than would be expected from carboplatin alone. Of the 36 patients entered onto the study, one experienced a complete response and 17 had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 50%. The recommended doses of paclitaxel (24-hour infusion) and carboplatin for future phase II studies of this combination are (1) paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with a carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 7 mg/mL x minute without filgrastim support; (2) paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with a carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 9 mg/mL x minute with filgrastim support; and (3) paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 with a carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 7 mg/mL x minute with filgrastim support. CONCLUSION: The regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin is well-tolerated and has promising activity in the treatment of NSCLC. There is no pharmacokinetic interaction between paclitaxel and carboplatin, but there is a pharmacodynamic, platelet-sparing effect on this dose-limiting toxicity of carboplatin.

A pilot phase I trial of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion with high-dose carboplatin as primary treatment of patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Because intraperitoneal (i.p.) therapy may provide a therapeutic advantage and because hyperthermia enhances carboplatin (CBDCA) cytotoxicity, we evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of CBDCA given via continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) in patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients underwent optimal cytoreductive procedures (residual disease < or =5 mm) as initial treatment of stages II and III epithelial ovarian adenocarcinoma. All patients received a 90-min CHPP at a CBDCA dose of 800-1200 mg/m2, with the perfusate being recirculated rapidly from a reservoir through a heat exchanger, resulting in i.p. temperatures of 41-43 degrees C. Plasma, perfusate, and urine samples were collected and platinum was quantified by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. RESULTS: At no time did any patient's core temperature exceed 40 degrees C. Peak perfusate platinum concentrations were 8- to 15-fold higher than peak ultrafilterable plasma concentrations. The permeability-area product was extremely high and variable (14-90 ml/min), resulting in a regional advantage of 1.9-5.3. The percentage of the dose absorbed ranged widely from 27% to 77%. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 and this was associated with a CBDCA AUC in plasma of 11 mg min ml(-1). CONCLUSION: CHPP with CBDCA was safely given to three patients at a dose of 800 mg/m2, and dose-limiting hematologic toxicities observed at 1200 mg/m2, correlated with the plasma CBDCA exposure established when lower doses of CBDCA are given systemically. The pharmacokinetic data are consistent with the expected effect of vigorous mixing on the exposed peritoneal surface area. Variable drug absorption and clearance make the prediction of systemic exposure highly uncertain. These findings may have important implications for novel therapies given i.p.

Phase I study of weekly outpatient paclitaxel and concurrent cranial irradiation in adults with astrocytomas.

PURPOSE: Astrocytomas are extremely resistant to currently available treatments. Cranial irradiation is a mainstay of frontline therapy, but tumor recurrence is nearly universal. Paclitaxel has shown antitumor efficacy against astrocytoma cell lines, and is a potent radiosensitizer. For these reasons, we conducted a phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent cranial irradiation in patients with newly diagnosed astrocytomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with astrocytomas were eligible for this study following initial surgery if they had a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) > or = 60%; normal hematologic, liver, and renal function; and could give informed consent. Beginning on day 1 of treatment, patients received paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion once weekly for 6 weeks, concurrent with standard cranial irradiation. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on 10 patients. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled; 56 were fully assessable. Forty-eight had glioblastomas (GBMs), 10 anaplastic astrocytomas (AAs), and two astrocytomas. Age ranged from 21 to 81 years (median, 55); KPS ranged from 60 to 100 (median, 70). The paclitaxel dose was escalated from 20 mg/m2 to 275 mg/m2. No clinically significant anemia or thrombocytopenia occurred. Only one patient (175 mg/m2) became neutropenic. Sensory neuropathy was dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 250 mg/m2. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetic profiles in study patients were identical to those of previously reported patients with other solid tumors. CONCLUSION: The MTD of paclitaxel administered weekly for 6 weeks by 3-hour infusion is 250 mg/m2. Since patients with brain tumors often have preexisting neurologic deficits, we suggest 225 mg/m2 as the optimum dose for phase II trials in this group of patients.

Phase I and clinical evaluation of a pharmacologically guided regimen of suramin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase I study was designed with the following objectives: (1) to describe the overall and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of suramin administered by intermittent short intravenous infusions until DLT or disease progression; (2) to determine the ability of an adaptive control with feedback (ACF) dosing strategy to maintain suramin plasma concentrations within a preselected range; (3) to develop a population model of suramin pharmacokinetics; and (4) to identify preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with advanced, incurable, solid tumors (including 69 with hormone-refractory prostate cancer) received an initial 5- to 7-day daily loading treatment followed by intermittent infusions individually determined by ACF using a Bayesian algorithm and relying on population models of suramin pharmacokinetics. Treatment was given to three cohorts of patients based on target plasma suramin concentration ranges (peak, 30 minutes postsuramin, and trough on morning of the treatment day), as follows: cohort 1, 175 to 300 micrograms/mL (27 patients); cohort 2, 150 to 250 micrograms/mL (23 patients); and cohort 3, 100 to 200 micrograms/mL (23 patients). All patients were to receive suramin until DLT or disease progression. RESULTS: The DLT was most commonly seen in cohort 1 and included a syndrome of malaise and fatigue, associated with weight loss, anorexia, and changes in taste. Other reversible toxicities were neurologic, renal, cutaneous, edema, lymphopenia and anemia, ophthalmologic, and alopecia. Forty of 67 assessable patients (60%) had a 50% reduction and 25 of 67 (37%) a 75% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels that lasted more than 4 weeks, seven of 18 (40%) had measurable responses, and 18 of 37 (49%) demonstrated major pain improvement. The overall times to disease progression and survival were 170 and 492 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: We have characterized all toxicities with suramin in a pharmacologically guided phase I study designed to maintain plasma suramin concentrations of 100 to 300 micrograms/mL (cohorts 1 to 3). The incidence of grade 3 to 4 neurologic abnormalities was relatively low, particularly in cohorts 2 and 3 (100 to 250 micrograms/mL). Evidence of significant and durable antitumor activity was seen in all three cohorts.

Development and validation of a pharmacokinetically based fixed dosing scheme for suramin.

PURPOSE: We used population pharmacokinetic-parameter estimates and designed a fixed dosing schedule to maintain plasma suramin concentrations between 100 and 300 micrograms/mL and then evaluated its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On day 1, patients received a 200-mg test dose and 1,000-mg/m2 loading dose. On days 2, 3, 4, and 5, patients received 1-hour infusions of 400, 300, 250, and 200 mg/m2, respectively. Subsequent 1-hour infusions of 275 mg/m2 were given on days 8, 11, 15, 19, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 67, and 78. Therapy was discontinued for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or progressive disease (PD). Patients were to be removed from the fixed dosing schedule if, after day 5, three consecutive peak plasma suramin concentrations were greater than 300 micrograms/mL. RESULTS: Forty-two patients, including 40 with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), received 700 infusions. Forty patients were assessable for toxicity; 38 were assessable for response. Two patients with preexisting pulmonary disease died early of respiratory insufficiency. Treatment was discontinued in five patients due to DLT and in seven due to PD. No patient had treatment discontinued due to repeated peak plasma suramin concentrations > or = 300 micrograms/mL. The fixed dosing schedule was precise, unbiased, and well tolerated. DLT consisted of grade 4 nephrotoxicity (n = 2), neurotoxicity (n = 2), and corticosteroid-induced psychosis (n = 1). Three patients, who received all 18 doses of suramin per protocol, developed severe, but not dose-limiting, malaise, fatigue, and lethargy. Twenty-four of 36 assessable patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels had a > or = 50% reduction, lasting more than 4 weeks, and 18 had a > or = 75% reduction, lasting more than 4 weeks. Twelve of 23 (52%) symptomatic HRPC patients noted a subjective improvement in pain. There were no measurable responses in four patients with measurable disease. The estimated median survival time in 38 assessable patients with HRPC was 18.8 months. The estimated median time to progression in 35 patients, for whom data were available, was 10.1 months. CONCLUSION: This easily implemented schedule allowed suramin to be administered safely as an intermittent bolus injection. Toxicity was manageable and reversible.

Paclitaxel disposition in plasma and central nervous systems of humans and rats with brain tumors.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (Taxol) has been shown to sensitize some malignant cells to the effects of radiation. A number of clinical protocols, combining paclitaxel with radiation therapy, have been designed to exploit this phenomenon. The radiation-potentiating effect of paclitaxel is likely dependent on the ability of the drug to penetrate the tissue being radiated. Paclitaxel is known to have limited access to the central nervous system (CNS) of rats and mice, but its ability to penetrate malignant tissue in the CNS is inadequately documented. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to examine the concentrations of paclitaxel in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with CNS malignancies and in normal and malignant tissues from the brains of Fischer rats bearing the C6 rat glioma and then to compare those paclitaxel concentrations with concomitant paclitaxel concentrations in the plasma of those same patients and animals. METHODS: Four patients were treated with 3-hour infusions of paclitaxel at doses between 90 and 200 mg/m2. Plasma and CSF were sampled at 0.33, 1.5, 3.25, 5, 6, and 24 hours after initiation of the paclitaxel infusion. Four Fischer rats had 20,000 C6 glioma cells stereotactically implanted into their right frontal lobes; 28 days later, they were given 3-hour infusions of paclitaxel at 10 mg/kg. Plasma was sampled during the paclitaxel infusion. At the completion of the infusion, rats were killed, and portions of their normal and malignant CNS tissues were removed for histologic assessment. Concentrations of paclitaxel in plasma, CSF, and brain tissue were determined with high-pressure liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients with brain tumors were comparable to those previously described in patients with other malignancies. Paclitaxel could be measured in CSF of all patients, but concentrations were very low. Peak paclitaxel concentrations in CSF ranged between 5 and 83 nM and occurred between 3.25 and 5 hours after initiation of the paclitaxel infusion. Peak paclitaxel concentrations in CSF were between 0.12% and 8.3% of those present in concomitant plasma samples. Paclitaxel was not detectable in the normal or malignant CNS tissue of any rat, despite the fact that plasma concentrations of paclitaxel at the time of tissue acquisition ranged from 0.62 to 153 microM. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel has only limited access to the CSF of patients with CNS malignancies and to normal and malignant CNS tissues of rats bearing brain tumors. IMPLICATIONS: The utility of combining paclitaxel with radiation therapy to treat CNS malignancies should be considered in light of the documented limited access of paclitaxel to the CNS.

Rapid and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for novobiocin in human serum.

In this paper we present a new HPLC method for the determination of novobiocin in human serum. The assay uses mitomycin C as an internal standard, protein precipitation with acetonitrile, an ODS reversed-phase column with an isocratic mobile phase of acetonitrile-0.01 M phosphoric acid (80:20, v/v), and UV detection at 340 nm. The assay has a lower limit of quantitation of 1 microgram/ml and is linear over the range of 1-1000 micrograms/ml. The assay is ideally suited for use in clinical trials as it requires minimal amounts of serum, is highly sensitive and reproducible, is performed with minimal sample preparation, and involves a short run time. It should prove important in evaluating the potential of novobiocin as a means to modulate resistance to antineoplastic chemotherapy and in therapeutic drug monitoring of the growing number of patients receiving novobiocin to control methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Suramin: development of a population pharmacokinetic model and its use with intermittent short infusions to control plasma drug concentration in patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to (1) develop a population pharmacokinetic model for suramin; (2) use Bayesian methods to assess suramin pharmacokinetics in individual patients; (3) use individual patients' pharmacokinetic parameter estimates to individualize suramin dose and schedule and maintain plasma suramin concentrations within predetermined target ranges; and (4) assess the feasibility of outpatient administration of suramin by intermittent, short infusions. METHODS: Plasma suramin concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and compartmental pharmacokinetic models were fit using a Bayesian algorithm. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using an iterative two-stage approach. Estimates of each patient's central-compartment volume were used to calculate suramin dosage. Simulation of that patient's suramin clearance was used to predict the time of his next dose. Using this approach, plasma suramin concentration was maintained at between 200 and 300, 175 and 275, 150 and 250, or 100 and 200 microgram/mL in four sequential patient cohorts. The ability of two- and three-compartment, open, linear models to fit the pharmacokinetic data was compared. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated, using both two- and three-compartment structural models in 69 hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: Target plasma suramin concentrations in individual patients were rapidly achieved. Concentrations were maintained within desired ranges for > or = 85% of treatment duration in all cohorts. A three-compartment, open, linear model described suramin pharmacokinetics better than did a two-compartment, open, linear model. Population pharmacokinetic estimates generated for two- and three-compartment pharmacokinetic models demonstrated modest interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and the long terminal half-life of suramin. CONCLUSION: Suramin can be administered by intermittent short infusion. Adaptive-control-with-feedback dosing facilitated precise control of plasma suramin concentrations and allowed a number of different concentration ranges to be studied. This approach is expensive and labor-intensive. Although we have demonstrated the ability to control drug exposure, simpler dosing schedules require critical evaluation. Population pharmacokinetic parameters generated in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer will facilitate rational design of such schedules.

Suramin, an active drug for prostate cancer: interim observations in a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that suramin may be an active agent for treatment of solid tumors. The clinical use of suramin is complicated by a broad spectrum of toxic effects and complex pharmacology. Studies have suggested that the dose-limiting neurotoxicity of this agent is closely related to sustained plasma drug concentrations of 350 micrograms/mL or more. PURPOSE: This phase I clinical trial in patients with solid tumors was designed to determine whether plasma concentrations resulting in both antitumor activity and manageable toxicity could be achieved with short, intermittent infusions of suramin. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients, including 33 with metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer, collectively received 43 courses of suramin designed to maintain a plasma concentration range of 200-300, 175-275, or 150-250 micrograms/mL. Patients received a test dose of 200 mg and an initial loading dose of 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 of therapy. Subsequent suramin doses and schedules were individually determined using a strategy of adaptive control with feedback, which used a maximum a posteriori Bayesian algorithm to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters. Patients were treated until dose-limiting toxicity or progressive disease developed. RESULTS: Thirty-five of the 37 study patients and 31 of the 33 with prostate cancer were assessable for toxicity and response. Treatment was discontinued in 28 patients because of dose-limiting toxicity consisting of a syndrome of malaise, fatigue, and lethargy; recurrent reduction in creatinine clearance of 50% or more; or axonal neuropathy. Evidence of major antitumor activity was observed in patients with prostate cancer treated at all three plasma drug concentrations. Measurable responses (one complete response and five partial responses) were noted in six of 12 patients with measurable disease. Twenty-four (77%) of 31 patients had a reduction in prostate-specific antigen of 50% or more, and 17 (55%) of 31 had a reduction of 75% or more. Twenty (83%) of 24 patients reported reduction in pain. CONCLUSIONS: Suramin can be safely administered as an intermittent bolus injection by use of adaptive control with feedback to control plasma drug concentrations; toxicity is significant but manageable and reversible. Suramin is active against hormone-refractory prostate cancer. IMPLICATIONS: Future trials should address the role and necessary extent of therapeutic drug monitoring; the optimal plasma drug concentration range and duration of therapy; and the activity of suramin in combination with other agents, in earlier stages of prostate cancer, and in other tumor types.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin.

A total of 21 patients with advanced cancer were entered into a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (LED) given weekly for 3 consecutive weeks at doses of 20, 30, or 37.5 mg/m2 per week. For a comparison of the pharmacokinetic behavior of LED with that of standard-formulation doxorubicin, 13 patients received a dose of standard-formulation doxorubicin 2 weeks prior to the first dose of LED. All doses were given by 1-h infusion through a central vein. Toxicity was evaluated in 22 courses delivered to 17 patients. The MTD with this schedule was 30 mg/m2 per week x 3. The single patient treated at 37.5 mg/m2 weekly could not complete the entire course due to myelosuppression. At the dose of 30 mg/m2 per week, three of eight patients had grade > or = 3 leukopenia. Other toxicities included mild to moderate thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, fever, alopecia, diarrhea, fatigue, stomatitis, and infection. At the dose of 30 mg/m2 per week, the total doxorubicin AUC and peak total doxorubicin concentrations in plasma were 8.75 +/- 8.80 microM h (mean +/- SD) and 3.07 +/- 1.45 microM, respectively, after LED administration. The total doxorubicin AUC and peak total doxorubicin concentrations in plasma were 3.92 +/- 2.47 microM h and 2.75 +/- 2.70 microM, respectively, after the infusion of standard-formulation doxorubicin. The total body clearance of doxorubicin was 18.42 +/- 11.23 l/h after the infusion of LED and 31.21 +/- 15.48 l/h after the infusion of standard-formulation doxorubicin. The mean elimination half-lives of doxorubicin were similar: 8.65 +/- 5.16 h for LED and 7.46 +/- 5.16 h for standard-formulation doxorubicin. Interpatient variability in pharmacokinetic parameters as demonstrated by the percentage of coefficients of variation was 33%-105%. There was no relationship between the percentage of WBC decrease or the duration of WBC suppression and the total doxorubicin or doxorubicinol AUC. There was no correlation between the duration of leukopenia and drug exposure as reflected by the AUC of liposome-associated doxorubicin. LED can be given in doses similar to those of standard-formulation doxorubicin and produces acute toxicities similar to those caused by standard doxorubicin.

Phase II trial and pharmacokinetic assessment of intravenous melphalan in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Alkylating agents have been reported to yield response rates of up to 20% in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Melphalan was studied in four small trials in which the drug was given orally. In this phase II trial, melphalan (30 mg/m2) was given intravenously every 28 days to 27 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed so as to describe the clearance of melphalan in this population and in an attempt to carry out pharmacodynamic modeling for toxicity and response. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was also assessed prospectively. No objective responses to this regimen were documented. The median survival for patients on this trial was 11.5 months. There was no correlation between drug clearance and measured creatinine clearance and no relationship between systemic exposure and toxicity. A decrease of > 50% in serum PSA that was sustained for > 6 weeks was documented in two patients, most notably in one patient who has survived for more than 29 months. Intravenous melphalan is not an active agent in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Approaches to optimal dosing of hexamethylene bisacetamide.

HMBA is a potent differentiating agent capable of causing > 95% morphological differentiation in cell lines in vitro. The induction of differentiation is dependent on both the concentration of and the duration of exposure to HMBA. However, acute toxicities (neurotoxicity and acidosis) have limited the maximal HMBA css value to < 2 mM, which is at the lower limit of effective in vitro concentrations. When HMBA css values have been maintained at 1-2 mM, thrombocytopenia has limited the duration of HMBA infusion to < or = 10 days. The present studies were performed to determine whether exposure to HMBA could be individualized and maximized without resulting in intolerable toxicity to patients and to determine which factors would predispose a patient to the development of acute toxicity during treatment with HMBA. For these investigations, patients were given HMBA at a target css using an adaptive-feedback-control method rather than at a set dose. Because HMBA administration produces large anion gaps, a simple maneuver such as alkalinization might enable the escalation of plasma HMBA css values to > 2 mM. HMBA was given as a 5-day CI to 14 patients (26 courses) at 2 target HMBA css levels near the maximal tolerated value in the presence or absence of concurrent alkalinization with sodium bicarbonate. Symptomatic acidosis occurred in one patient who did not receive bicarbonate. Neurotoxicity proved to be dose-limiting at the target HMBA css value of 1.5-2.0 mM in the absence of concurrent alkalinization and at a css level of > 2 mM, regardless of alkalinization. No neurotoxicity was seen at target HMBA css values of 1.5-2.0 mM in patients who did receive concurrent alkalinization. Alkalinization was not associated with any detectable changes in plasma HMBA metabolites. With the maximal tolerable 5-day HMBA css having thus been defined at 1.5-2.0 mM, we attempted to maximize exposure to HMBA by defining a tolerable duration of infusion. Individualization of the duration of HMBA infusion to a target nadir PLT was performed in patients who had received an initial 5-day CI of HMBA at a css 1.5-2.0 mM along with concurrent alkalinization. The AUC achieved and the thrombocytopenia produced during this first course were used to predict the duration of infusion that each patient would subsequently tolerate (at an HMBA css of 1-2 mM) to achieve a nadir PLT of 75,000-100,000/microliters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of the monoamine oxidase inhibitor, tranylcypromine, on induction of HL60 cell differentiation by hexamethylene bisacetamide and N-acetyl-1,6-diaminohexane.

Hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA) is converted by successive deacetylation and oxidation reactions to four major metabolites; in vitro, the initial deacetylated metabolite, N-acetyl-1,6-diaminohexane (NAD-AH), is more potent than HMBA (Synder, S.W.; Egorin, M.J.; Geelhaar, L.A.; Hamburger, A.W.; Callery, P.S. Cancer Res. 48:3613-3616; 1988). We propose that monoamine oxidase (MAO) catalyzed metabolism of NADAH to 6-acetamidohexanoic acid (AcHA) is an inactivation pathway and, therefore, investigated whether blocking such metabolism with the MAO inhibitor, tranylcypromine, would potentiate induction of cell differentiation by HMBA and NADAH. Tranylcypromine, at concentrations up to 30 micrograms/mL, did not inhibit HL60 cell growth and did not induce differentiation of HL60 cells. Tranylcypromine did, however, produce concentration-dependent enhancement of HMBA- and NADAH-induced differentiation. In contrast, 30 micrograms/mL of tranylcypromine did not effect the ability of dimethylsulfoxide, at concentrations between 0.25% and 1.25%, to induce differentiation of HL60 cells. Tranylcypromine, at 30 micrograms/mL, did not change cellular concentrations of HMBA or NADAH but did reduce intracellular concentrations of AcHA, consistent with inhibition of MAO catalyzed conversion of NADAH to AcHA. These results support the hypothesis that MAO catalyzed metabolism of NADH to AcHA is an inactivation pathway and may provide the basis for a clinical trail in which HMBA metabolism is modulated with concurrent tranylcypromine therapy.

Phase I trial using adaptive control dosing of hexamethylene bisacetamide (NSC 95580).

Hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA), a potent differentiating agent, was administered to patients with refractory malignant tumors. Thirteen patients received 30 evaluable courses. HMBA was given by continuous i.v. infusion for 5 days. Therapy was repeated every 28 days, if patients had recovered from toxicity. The starting dose was 24 g/m2/day. Because our previous trial had shown wide interpatient variability in HMBA pharmacokinetics and excess toxicity at HMBA plasma concentrations greater than 2 mM (HMBA doses between 24 and 33.6 g/m2/day), we attempted to individualize each patient's dose based on a dosing scheme using an adaptive (feedback) control algorithm, which assumed linear clearance for HMBA. In all courses, a plasma sample was assayed daily and infusion rates were adjusted to achieve an HMBA plasma concentration of 1.5-2.0 mM (300-400 mg/liter). The patients included 12 men and 1 woman with a median age of 56 years (range, 34-76) and median Karnofsky performance status of 90% (range, 60-100). All patients had received prior chemotherapy and 9 patients had also received radiation therapy. The linear adaptive control algorithm was reasonably precise, with a mean absolute error of 0.28 (SE 0.04) mM. However, adjustments in infusion rate systematically overshot the desired change in steady state concentration, probably due to nonlinear clearance of HMBA. For levels within 24 h of a change in infusion rate, this resulted in significant bias, with a mean error of 0.24 (SE 0.09) mM. The mean absolute error was 0.40 (SE 0.06) mM. A second adaptive control algorithm, using a pharmacokinetic model with parallel first-order (renal) clearance and Michaelis-Menten (nonrenal) clearance and using Bayesian parameter estimation with a priori estimates based on our previous phase I trial, proved to be much more precise than the linear method and was unbiased when applied retrospectively to the same observations, with a mean error (within 24 h of a change in infusion rate) of 0.02 (SE 0.06) mM and a mean absolute error of 0.22 (SE 0.03) mM. Toxicity was reversible in all cases. Neurotoxicity, consisting of hallucinations, agitation, somnolence, or confusion, was seen in 2 patients. Four patients complained of insomnia or anxiety. Mild asymptomatic acidosis was seen in 3 patients. Other toxicity included grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting (10 patients), grade 2 diarrhea (2 patients), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (3 patients), grade 1-3 leukopenia (3 patients), and oral herpes simplex infection (4 patients). Mild reversible renal insufficiency (measured by creatinine clearance) was seen in 8 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)