Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 57(11): 5266-70, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23939887

ABSTRACT

Nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile (NTCD) has been shown to prevent fatal C. difficile infection in the hamster model when hamsters are challenged with standard toxigenic C. difficile strains. The purpose of this study was to determine if NTCD can prevent C. difficile infection in the hamster model when hamsters are challenged with restriction endonuclease analysis group BI C. difficile strains. Groups of 10 hamsters were given oral clindamycin, followed on day 2 by 10(6) CFU of spores of NTCD strain M3 or T7, and were challenged on day 5 with 100 CFU of spores of BI1 or BI6. To conserve animals, results for control hamsters challenged with BI1 or BI6 from the present study and controls from previous identical experiments were combined for statistical comparisons. NTCD strains M3 and T7 achieved 100% colonization and were 100% protective against challenge with BI1 (P ≤ 0.001). M3 colonized 9/10 hamsters and protected against BI6 challenge in the colonized hamsters (P = 0.0003). T7 colonized 10/10 hamsters, but following BI6 challenge, cocolonization occurred in 5 hamsters, 4 of which died, for protection of 6/10 animals (P = 0.02). NTCD colonization provides protection against challenge with toxigenic BI group strains. M3 is more effective than T7 in preventing C. difficile infection caused by the BI6 epidemic strain. Prevention of C. difficile infection caused by the epidemic BI6 strain may be more challenging than that of infections caused by historic BI1 and non-BI C. difficile strains.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/immunology , Cross Protection , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/prevention & control , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/veterinary , Immunity, Heterologous , Spores, Bacterial/immunology , Adaptive Immunity , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Clindamycin/pharmacology , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridioides difficile/pathogenicity , Cricetinae , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/immunology , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/microbiology , Male , Mesocricetus , Spores, Bacterial/drug effects , Spores, Bacterial/pathogenicity
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 14(7): 1039-45, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18598622

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile is a recognized pathogen in neonatal pigs and may contribute to enteritis in calves. Toxinotype V strains have been rare causes of human C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD). We examined toxinotype V in human disease, the genetic relationship of animal and human toxinotype V strains, and in vitro toxin production of these strains. From 2001 through 2006, 8 (1.3%) of 620 patient isolates were identified as toxinotype V; before 2001, 7 (<0.02%) of approximately 6,000 isolates were identified as toxinotype V. Six (46.2%) of 13 case-patients for whom information was available had community-associated CDAD. Molecular characterization showed a high degree of similarity between human and animal toxinotype V isolates; all contained a 39-bp tcdC deletion and most produced binary toxin. Further study is needed to understand the epidemiology of CDAD caused by toxinotype V C. difficile, including the potential of foodborne transmission to humans.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins/classification , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Bacterial Proteins/classification , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Cattle , Clostridium Infections/genetics , Clostridium Infections/veterinary , Community-Acquired Infections/genetics , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Disease Reservoirs , Enterotoxins/classification , Enterotoxins/genetics , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/veterinary , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Repressor Proteins/classification , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Ribotyping , Sus scrofa
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(2): 431-7, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18039796

ABSTRACT

Using 42 isolates contributed by laboratories in Canada, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States, we compared the results of analyses done with seven Clostridium difficile typing techniques: multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), surface layer protein A gene sequence typing (slpAST), PCR-ribotyping, restriction endonuclease analysis (REA), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). We assessed the discriminating ability and typeability of each technique as well as the agreement among techniques in grouping isolates by allele profile A (AP-A) through AP-F, which are defined by toxinotype, the presence of the binary toxin gene, and deletion in the tcdC gene. We found that all isolates were typeable by all techniques and that discrimination index scores for the techniques tested ranged from 0.964 to 0.631 in the following order: MLVA, REA, PFGE, slpAST, PCR-ribotyping, MLST, and AFLP. All the techniques were able to distinguish the current epidemic strain of C. difficile (BI/027/NAP1) from other strains. All of the techniques showed multiple types for AP-A (toxinotype 0, binary toxin negative, and no tcdC gene deletion). REA, slpAST, MLST, and PCR-ribotyping all included AP-B (toxinotype III, binary toxin positive, and an 18-bp deletion in tcdC) in a single group that excluded other APs. PFGE, AFLP, and MLVA grouped two, one, and two different non-AP-B isolates, respectively, with their AP-B isolates. All techniques appear to be capable of detecting outbreak strains, but only REA and MLVA showed sufficient discrimination to distinguish strains from different outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Clostridioides difficile/classification , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Molecular Epidemiology/methods , Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis/methods , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Canada , Disease Outbreaks , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/epidemiology , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/microbiology , Genotype , Humans , Minisatellite Repeats , Netherlands , Prohibitins , Reproducibility of Results , Restriction Mapping/methods , Ribotyping/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , United Kingdom , United States
4.
J Infect Dis ; 196(12): 1813-9, 2007 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18190262

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: North American and European hospitals have reported outbreaks of Clostridium difficile-associated disease with unexpectedly high mortality caused by a newly recognized group of C. difficile strains, group BI. Our objective was to compare, in hamsters, the virulence of a historical nonepidemic BI type, BI1, with that of 2 recent epidemic BI types, BI6 and BI17, and with that of 2 standard toxigenic strains, K14 and 630. METHODS: For each strain, 10 hamsters were given 1 dose of clindamycin, followed 5 days later with 100 C. difficile spores administered by gastric inoculation. Outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: The hamster model demonstrated variations in mean times from inoculation to death (for BI6, 40 h; for BI1, 48 h; for K14, 49 h; for BI17, 69 h; for 630, 102 h; for BI6, BI1, and K14 vs. 630, P< .01; for BI17 vs. 630, P< .05) and from colonization to death (for BI1, 7 h; for BI17, 13 h; for BI6, 16 h; for K14, 17 h; for 630, 52 h; for BI1, BI17, BI6, and K14 vs. 630, P< .01). CONCLUSION: Group BI strains were not more rapidly fatal than the standard toxinotype 0 strain K14 but were more rapidly fatal than the standard toxinotype 0 strain 630. BI6, the most common BI type in our collection, was particularly virulent in hamsters, consistently causing death within 48 h of inoculation.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/pathogenicity , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Animals , Bacterial Toxins/biosynthesis , Clindamycin/pharmacology , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridioides difficile/metabolism , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Cricetinae , Disease Models, Animal , Disease Outbreaks , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Male , Mesocricetus
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...