The proper tidal volume target using volume guarantee ventilation in the course of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a crucial endpoint.

Volume guarantee ventilation (VGV) is an optional ventilation mode which has become the most widely and extensively studied in the last 10 years in premature infants. Nonetheless, theoretical expected endpoints are intriguing and even though VGV has not yet become 'the' standard ventilation mode, a great deal of information has been acquired and stored. In our experience, VGV during the course of respiratory distress syndrome is useful and can be considered a standard ventilation mode. Weaning occurs in real time as described earlier, and synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation and pressure support ventilation (PSV) seem to be the preferred combined modes. Management during the acute phase requires more care since several sudden changes take place in both the lung mechanics and clinical behavior. The software is designed to protect the lung, and subsequently, sudden changes in lung compliance following iatrogenic procedures such as surfactant administration are powerfully counteracted. VGV has been extensively studied and the proposed algorithm has been found to function as planned. Although the 'superiority' of one method over another cannot be demonstrated, the use of new technologies require 'a staff learning curve' and homogeneity of treatment, while at the same time other factors, such as patient heterogeneity or illness phase, should be taken into due account.

Ligurian experience on neonatal hearing screening: clinical and epidemiological aspects.

AIM: Early identification and rehabilitation of newborns with congenital hearing impairment (HI) by Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS). METHODS: The neonatal population was divided into two groups: babies with No Audiological Risk (NAR), and babies With Audiological Risk (WAR). NAR neonates underwent OAE testing, and in case of a doubtful (Refer) result, ABR testing was carried out. All WAR newborns underwent ABR testing within the third month of life. RESULTS: Between February 1, 2002 and December 31, 2004, UNHS was carried out on 32 502 newborns at the 13 regional birth centres, representing 98.7% of the whole regional neonatal population. The prevalence of HI in the population we tested was estimated at about 1 per thousand, while Bilateral Hearing Impairment (BHI) was estimated at 0.65 per thousand. A 3.7% prevalence of HI and a 2.8% prevalence of BHI was observed among the WAR population. Median age at the end of the diagnostic procedures was 6.7 months in the WAR population and 6.9 months in the NAR population. CONCLUSIONS: Our project is based on two levels of testing, which resulted in a 0.28% false-positive rate with 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. Our screening is the first Italian experience that has been extended to a whole region and the results prove that regional neonatal hearing screening is feasible.

Neonatal hearing screening model: an Italian regional experience.

OBJECTIVE: To produce a model for routine centralized hearing screening including all aspects of the screening, from diagnosis to psychological counseling and early rehabilitation. METHODS: A prospective observational study on a geographically defined pediatric population (Liguria region, northwestern Italy) and data collection in a data bank. The model proposed was created for the audiological screening of all newborns of the Liguria region. The model includes four phases: (1) preliminary identification of contractual, administrative, legal aspects; (2) screening for identification of congenital hearing impairment; (3) therapy and rehabilitation of identified subjects and genetic analysis; (4) epidemiology, data management, and workload management. To test the feasibility of the model proposed and to establish the workload required according to the resources available in the regional health plan, we performed a pilot study on all infants born in four of the 13 regional birth centers of Liguria region from 1 April 2001 to 30 September 2001. RESULTS: Out of the 3268 newborns enrolled during the 6-month pilot study, 3238 (99.1%) were screened with otoacoustic emissions (OAE), while screening was refused in 30 newborns (0.9%). OAE resulted in a 'pass' for 3180 newborns (98.2%) and a 'refer' in 58 (1.8%). The standard auditory brainstem response (ABR) test was performed in 156 newborns, 58 of them as a result of the 'refer' at the second OAE and 98 others at audiological risk. Results were positive or uncertain at first ABR in 45 patients. Workload was calculated on the basis of the data obtained in the pilot study to allocate financial and organizational resources. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the pilot study allowed project planning. We think that the screening model proposed is an example of how a regional organization can deliver improved quality care through a rationalization and optimization process.

A randomised control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the Infant Flow Driver (IFD) with single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm neonates affected by respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: Randomised controlled study. PATIENTS: Between September 1997 and March 1999, 36 preterm infants who were eligible for CPAP treatment were randomly selected for either nCPAP or IFD and studied prospectively for changes in oxygen requirement and/or respiratory rate. The requirement for mechanical ventilation, complications of treatment, and effects on mid-term outcome were also evaluated. RESULTS: Use of the IFD had a significantly beneficial effect on both oxygen requirement and respiratory rate (p < 0.0001) when compared with nCPAP. Moreover, O(2) requirement and respiratory rate were significantly decreased by four hours (p < 0.001 and p < 0.03 respectively). The probability of remaining supplementary oxygen free over the first 48 hours of treatment was significantly higher in patients treated with the IFD than with nCPAP (p < 0.02). IFD treated patients had a higher success (weaning) rate (94% v 72 %) and shorter duration of treatment (49.3 (31) v 56 (29.7) hours respectively; mean (SD)), although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: IFD appears to be a feasible device for managing respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants, and benefits may be had with regard to oxygen requirement and respiratory rate when compared with nCPAP. The trend towards reduced requirement for mechanical ventilation, shorter clinical recovery time, and shorter duration of treatment requires further evaluation in a multicentre randomised clinical trial.