QL1209 (pertuzumab biosimilar) versus reference pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel in neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative, early or locally advanced breast cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel-controlled, phase III equivalence trial.

BACKGROUND: This randomized, parallel-controlled, double-blinded, phase III equivalence study evaluated the equivalence of a proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 to the pertuzumab (Perjeta®) each with trastuzumab and docetaxel in neoadjuvant treatment of early or locally advanced breast cancer patients with HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive 4 cycles of neoadjuvant QL1209 or pertuzumab each with trastuzumab and docetaxel, and adjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was total pathologic complete response (tpCR), with equivalence margins of 0.76 to 1.32. RESULTS: Among the 585 patients enrolled, 257 and 259 patients were assigned to the QL1209 and pertuzumab groups, respectively. The tpCR rates were comparable in the QL1209 (109/255, 42.75%; 90% CI 37.65 to 47.84) and pertuzumab (117/259, 45.17%; 90% CI 40.09 to 50.26) groups. The tpCR risk ratio was 0.95 (90% CI, 0.80 to 1.11), and the 90% CI fell within the predefined equivalence margin. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was decreased neutrophil count (10. 9% vs. 12.7%) in the QL1209 and pertuzumab groups. CONCLUSIONS: QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and comparable safety profile to the reference pertuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative, early, or locally advanced breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinadrugtrials.org CTR20201073; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04629846.

Rational and trial design of FASCINATE-N: a prospective, randomized, precision-based umbrella trial.

Background: With our growing insight into the molecular heterogeneity and biological characteristics of breast cancer, individualized treatment is the future of cancer treatment. In this prospective Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Breast Cancer Precision Platform Series study - neoadjuvant therapy (FASCINATE-N) trial, we classify breast cancer patients using multiomic characteristics into different subtypes to evaluate the efficacy of precision-based targeted therapies compared to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods and design: The FASCINATE-N trial is a prospective, randomized, precision-based umbrella trial that plans to enroll 716 women with early breast cancer. After enrollment, patients will first be divided into three groups: hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, HER2+, and HR-/HER2-. The HR+/HER2- patients are further stratified using fusion and clustering of similarity network fusion (SNF) algorithm into four subtypes; HER2+ patients are divided into HR+/HER2+ and HR-/HER2+ subtypes; and HR-/HER2- patients are stratified using the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center classification. For the assignment of drugs to patients, Bayesian methods of adaptive randomization will be used. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response rate; secondary endpoints include 3-year invasive disease-free survival, overall response rate, and toxicities according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) scale version 4.0 and the ratio of patients with complete cell cycle arrest (Ki67 < 2.7%) in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Discussion: The goal of our trial is to test the efficacy of our subtyping-based treatment in a neoadjuvant setting and to conduct a pilot study into the efficacy of targeted therapies within each precision-based subtype. The precision-based treatment arm can be updated with the refinement of our subtyping method, the discovery of new targets, and the development of novel targeted drugs. Our trial offers a unique opportunity to provide patients with individualized neoadjuvant therapy and test promising novel treatments that may further benefit patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05582499 (https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05582499).

Rational and trial design of FASCINATE-N (Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Breast Cancer Precision Platform Series study- neoadjuvant therapy): a prospective, randomized, precision-based umbrella trial Our FASCINATE-N trial is a prospective, randomized, precision-based umbrella trial that plans to enroll 716 women with early breast cancer. We will first divide patients into three groups: hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)−, HER2+, and HR−/HER2−. Then, we will further classify patients using multiomic characteristics into different subtypes to evaluate the efficacy of precision-based targeted therapies compared to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The goal of our trial is to test the efficacy of our subtyping-based treatment in a neoadjuvant setting and to conduct a pilot study into the efficacy of targeted therapies within each precision-based subtype. The precision-based treatment arm can be updated with the refinement of our subtyping method, the discovery of new targets and the development of novel targeted drugs. Our trial offers a unique opportunity to provide patients with individualized neoadjuvant therapy and test promising novel treatments that may further benefit patients.

Subtyping-based platform guides precision medicine for heavily pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: The FUTURE phase II umbrella clinical trial.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease and lacks effective treatment. Our previous study classified TNBCs into four subtypes with putative therapeutic targets. Here, we report the final results of FUTURE, a phase II umbrella trial designed to explore whether the subtyping-based strategy may improve the outcomes in metastatic TNBC patients. A total of 141 patients with a median of three previous lines of therapies in the metastatic setting were enrolled in seven parallel arms. Confirmed objective responses were achieved in 42 patients (29.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 22.4-38.1). The median values of progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.4 (95% CI: 2.7-4.2) and 10.7 (95% CI: 9.1-12.3) months, respectively. Given Bayesian predictive probability, efficacy boundaries were achieved in four arms. Furthermore, integrated genomic and clinicopathological profiling illustrated associations of clinical and genomic parameters with treatment efficacy, and the efficacy of novel antibody-drug conjugates was explored in preclinical TNBC models of subtypes for which treatment was futile. In general, the FUTURE strategy recruits patients efficiently and provides promising efficacy with manageable toxicities, outlining a direction for further clinical exploration.

The advance of adjuvant treatment for triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer characterized by its highly aggressive behavior, early recurrence, and poor outcomes, when compared with other subtypes. Due to the absence of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression, TNBC lacks meaningful biomarkers and an effective therapeutic strategy. Chemotherapy remains the main adjuvant treatment for patients with TNBC. Anthracycline/taxane-based regimens are the standard of care in adjuvant settings. The addition of capecitabine or platinum may offer extra benefits to patients with TNBC, but at the cost of increased toxicity or adverse events. Dose-dense chemotherapy may enhance treatment efficacy in patients who are able to tolerate the treatment regimen, especially in high-risk patients. As a heterogenous disease, TNBC can be classified into several molecular subtypes according to genomic or transcriptional features, which may indicate potential targets for more precise and individualized treatment strategies. With our increased understanding of signal pathways associated with TNBC, as well as the discovery of novel biomarkers indicative of TNBC prognosis, several new therapeutic options are under investigation, and some have already reported good results. In this review, we summarized the current conventional therapeutic strategies and emerging clinical trials regarding adjuvant treatment for TNBC. Furthermore, we evaluated the prognostic value of several potential targets and the progress of targeted therapy in TNBC, both in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.

Serum HER2 levels predict treatment efficacy and prognosis in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains regarding the predictive and prognostic value of serum human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the clinical utility and efficacy of serum HER2 (sHER2) in predicting treatment response and prognosis in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab treatment. METHODS: A total of 309 HER2-positive breast cancer patients diagnosed at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from July 2015 to January 2019 were analyzed. Baseline sHER2 levels were obtained for all patients and sHER2 levels were collected after 2 cycles of treatment in 208 patients. A sHER2 level ≥15 ng/mL was regarded as "high expression" and sHER2 <15 ng/mL was regarded as "low expression". Outcome measures of treatment efficacy and prognosis were pathological complete response (pCR) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), respectively. RESULTS: In patients with high baseline sHER2, more were ER-negative (P=0.029), had larger tumor size (P=0.006), more advanced clinical stage (P=0.002), higher Miller-Payne grade (P=0.024) and higher likelihood of iDFS events (P=0.015). Patients with high sHER2 levels after 2 cycles of treatment had lower pCR rates (P=0.038), higher Miller-Payne grade (P=0.013) and higher likelihood of iDFS events (P=0.003). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in iDFS between patients with high and low sHER2 levels at baseline (P=0.019) and after 2 cycles of treatment (P=0.000). Further analyses according to cancer subtypes found baseline sHER2 to be significantly correlated with the iDFS of Luminal B patients (p=0.002), while sHER2 levels after 2 cycles of treatment was significantly correlated with the iDFS of HER2-enriched patients (P=0.000). Univariate analysis showed significant association between iDFS and tumor size (P=0.026), lymph node status (P=0.008), clinical stage (P=0.031), baseline sHER2 (P=0.024), overall tumor response (P=0.011), pCR (P=0.043) and Miller-Payne grade (P=0.001). Multivariate analysis found Miller-Payne grade (P=0.037) to be significantly associated with iDFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the clinical value of sHER2 in a population of Chinese breast cancer patients, suggesting that sHER2 levels after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy may be more predictive of treatment outcomes and that the prognostic value of sHER2 may be time point and subtype dependent.

Tumor Size Still Impacts Prognosis in Breast Cancer With Extensive Nodal Involvement.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although tumor size and nodal status are the most important prognostic factors, it is believed that nodal status outperforms tumor size as a prognostic factor. In particular, when patients have a nodal stage greater than N2 (more than nine positive lymph nodes), it is well accepted that tumor size does not retain its prognostic value. Even in the newest American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) prognostic staging system, which includes molecular subtype as an important prognostic factor, T1-3N2 patients are categorized as the same population. The same is true for T1-4N3 patients. Moreover, some physicians have speculated that for tumors staged N2 or greater, the smaller the tumor is, the more aggressive the tumor. Thus, this study aims to investigate the prognostic value of tumor stage (T stage) in patients with extensive nodal involvement and to compare the survival of T4N × M0 and T × N3M0. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Female breast cancer patients with nine or more positive lymph nodes or with T4 tumors were identified in the SEER registry between 2010 and 2015. The effect of T stage on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve method and risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression modeling. Survival comparison of T4NxM0 and TxN3M0 patients was also achieved using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve method and risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 21,696 women with N2-3 tumors were included from 284,073 patients.T stage, nodal stage (N stage), ER, PR, HER2 and grade were all independent prognostic factors (p <0.001). HRs for ER, PR, HER2, grade, and N stage were 0.662 (0.595-0.738), 0.488 (0.438-0.543), 0.541 (0.489-0.598), 1.534 (1.293-1.418) and 1.551 (1.435-1.676), respectively. Notably, HER2 positivity was correlated with better BCSS possibly due to the wide adoption of anti-HER2 therapy. Using T1 as a reference, HRs of T2, T3, and T4 were 1.363 (1.200-1.548), 2.092 (1.824-2.399) and 3.497 (3.045-4.017), respectively. The same results held true when subgroup analysis based on N stage were conducted. In the two subgroups, namely, women staged as T1-3N2 and women staged as T1-4N3, T stage was also a significant negative prognostic factor independent of ER, PR, HER2 and grade. Moreover, 8,328 women staged as T4 with different nodal statuses were also identified from the whole database. When we compared T4Nx with TxN3, it was found that T4 tumors exhibited worse outcomes than N3 tumors independent of other prognostic factors. When molecular subtype was included in the subgroup analysis, survival could not be distinguished between T4 and N3 only in TNBC. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with extensive nodal status, tumor stage remains a prognostic factor independent of other factors, such as ER, PR, HER2, and grade. In patients with T4Nx or TxN3 tumors, T4 tumors exhibit worse outcomes than N3 tumors independent of other prognostic factors. The AJCC staging system should be modified based on these findings.

Molecular subtyping and genomic profiling expand precision medicine in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the FUTURE trial.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, and molecular subtyping may result in improved diagnostic precision and targeted therapies. Our previous study classified TNBCs into four subtypes with putative therapeutic targets. Here, we conducted the FUTURE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03805399), a phase Ib/II subtyping-based and genomic biomarker-guided umbrella trial, to evaluate the efficacy of these targets. Patients with refractory metastatic TNBC were enrolled and stratified by TNBC subtypes and genomic biomarkers, and assigned to one of these seven arms: (A) pyrotinib with capecitabine, (B) androgen receptor inhibitor with CDK4/6 inhibitor, (C) anti PD-1 with nab-paclitaxel, (D) PARP inhibitor included, (E) and (F) anti-VEGFR included, or (G) mTOR inhibitor with nab-paclitaxel. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). We enrolled 69 refractory metastatic TNBC patients with a median of three previous lines of therapy (range, 1-8). Objective response was achieved in 20 (29.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.7%-41.2%) of the 69 intention-to-treat (ITT) patients. Our results showed that immunotherapy (arm C), in particular, achieved the highest ORR (52.6%, 95% CI: 28.9%-75.6%) in the ITT population. Arm E demonstrated favorable ORR (26.1%, 95% CI: 10.2%-48.4% in the ITT population) but with more high grade (≥ 3) adverse events. Somatic mutations of TOP2A and CD8 immunohistochemical score may have the potential to predict immunotherapy response in the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC. In conclusion, the phase Ib/II FUTURE trial suggested a new concept for TNBC treatment, demonstrating the clinical benefit of subtyping-based targeted therapy for refractory metastatic TNBC.

Randomized phase II clinical trial and biomarker analysis of paclitaxel plus epirubicin versus vinorelbine plus epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variations.

PURPOSE: Resistance to paclitaxel remains a major challenge in treating breast cancer. Our preclinical study suggested that TEKT4 germline variations in breast cancer are associated with paclitaxel resistance and increase vinorelbine sensitivity. This clinical trial compared the efficacy of paclitaxel and vinorelbine in breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: In this open-label, single-center, phase II trial, female patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, stage IIB-IIIC breast cancer harboring TEKT4 germline variations were randomly assigned to the paclitaxel plus epirubicin (PE) or vinorelbine plus epirubicin (NE). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Targeted sequencing of a panel comprising 484 breast-related genes was performed to identify pCR-associated somatic mutations in each group. RESULTS: 91 Patients were assigned to PE (46 patients) or NE (45 patients). NE numerically increased the pCR rate (22.2% versus 8.7%, P = 0.074). The ORRs for NE and PE were 82.2% and 76.1%, respectively. Interestingly, NE (15.4%) showed a significantly higher pCR rate than PE (0%) in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive subgroup (P = 0.044). Both regimens were well tolerated, with grade 3 and 4 toxicities reported at the expected levels. The biomarker analysis showed that UNC13D mutation predicted the pCR rate in NE (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary endpoint was not met, NE might bring clinical benefit to HR-positive patients or patients simultaneously carrying UNC13D mutations.

The Prognostic Impact of Age at Diagnosis Upon Breast Cancer of Different Immunohistochemical Subtypes: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Population-Based Analysis.

Background and Objectives: The influence of age at diagnosis of breast cancer upon the prognosis of patients with different immunohistochemical (IHC)-defined subtypes is still incompletely defined. Our study aimed at examining the association of age at diagnosis and risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Methods: 172,179 eligible breast cancer patients were obtained for our study cohort using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2010 to 2015. Patients were classified into four IHC-defined subtypes according to their ER, PgR, and HER2 status. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to describe BCSM among patients in different age groups. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. A multivariable fractional polynomial model within the Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between age at diagnosis and the risk of BCSM. Results: For the whole cohort, the median follow-up time was 43 months. Patients younger than 40 years and those older than 79 years presented with the worst BCSM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.23, and HR 3.52, 95% CI 3.23-3.83, respectively, p < 0.01, with age 40-49 years as the reference). The log hazard ratios of hormone receptor (HoR)(+)/HER2(-) patients formed a quadratic relationship between age at diagnosis and BCSM, but not in the other three subtypes of breast cancer. In the HoR(+)/HER2(-) subtype, patients younger than 40 years had worse BCSM than those aged at 40-49 years (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.45, and p < 0.01). Conclusions: Women diagnosed with HoR(+)/HER2(-) breast cancer younger than 40 years or older than 79 years of age suffer higher rates of cancer-specific mortality. Young age at diagnosis may be particularly prognostic in HoR(+)/HER2(-) breast cancer.

Molecular subtypes and precision treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype. Despite the progress made in precision treatment of cancer patients, targeted treatment is still at its early stage in TNBC, and chemotherapy remains the standard treatment. With the advances in next generation sequencing technology, genomic and transcriptomic analyses have provided deeper insight into the inter-tumoral heterogeneity of TNBC. Much effort has been made to classify TNBCs into different molecular subtypes according to genetic aberrations and expression signatures and to uncover novel treatment targets. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge regarding the molecular classification of TNBC and explore the future paradigm for using molecular classification to guide the development of precision treatment and clinical practice.

Metastatic breast cancer patients with lung or liver metastases should be distinguished before being treated with fulvestrant.

BACKGROUND: Endocrine therapy is the preferred treatment for patients with hormone receptor -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). While visceral metastasis is a negative prognostic factor, few studies have distinguished between the prognoses of patients with metastases at different visceral sites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 398 patients receiving fulvestrant 500 mg at a single center over a 6-year period were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the PFS of patients with lung and liver metastases. RESULTS: Baseline visceral metastases were present in 233 patients, including 138 with lungw/o liver metastases (lung metastases without liver involvement), 51 with liverw/o lung metastases (liver metastases without lung involvement) and 41 with lung and liver metastases. The median PFS was 6.8 months (5.6 and 9.2 months for visceral and nonvisceral metastases, respectively, P = .028). PFS was longer in patients with lungw/o liver metastases than in those with liverw/o lung metastases or lung and liver metastases (9.6, 3.7 and 3.2 months, respectively, P < .001; liverw/o lung vs. lungw/o liver hazard ratio (HR) 1.70; lung and liver vs. lungw/o liver HR 2.85). Patients with liver metastases experienced significantly worse PFS than those without liver involvement (3.7 vs. 9.2 months, P < .001). PFS benefits were observed in patients with longer disease-free intervals, no liver metastases, and no previous chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Fulvestrant treatment benefited patients with lungw/o liver or nonvisceral metastases. When treating hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients with endocrine therapy, it is important to differentiate patients with lung metastases from those with liver metastases.

Genomic and Transcriptomic Landscape of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Subtypes and Treatment Strategies.

We comprehensively analyzed clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic data of a cohort of 465 primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PIK3CA mutations and copy-number gains of chromosome 22q11 were more frequent in our Chinese cohort than in The Cancer Genome Atlas. We classified TNBCs into four transcriptome-based subtypes: (1) luminal androgen receptor (LAR), (2) immunomodulatory, (3) basal-like immune-suppressed, and (4) mesenchymal-like. Putative therapeutic targets or biomarkers were identified among each subtype. Importantly, the LAR subtype showed more ERBB2 somatic mutations, infrequent mutational signature 3 and frequent CDKN2A loss. The comprehensive profile of TNBCs provided here will serve as a reference to further advance the understanding and precision treatment of TNBC.

The endogenous retrovirus-derived long noncoding RNA TROJAN promotes triple-negative breast cancer progression via ZMYND8 degradation.

Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) play pivotal roles in the development of breast cancer. However, the detailed mechanisms of noncoding HERVs remain elusive. Here, our genome-wide transcriptome analysis of HERVs revealed that a primate long noncoding RNA, which we dubbed TROJAN, was highly expressed in human triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TROJAN promoted TNBC proliferation and invasion and indicated poor patient outcomes. We further confirmed that TROJAN could bind to ZMYND8, a metastasis-repressing factor, and increase its degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by repelling ZNF592. TROJAN also epigenetically up-regulated metastasis-related genes in multiple cell lines. Correlations between TROJAN and ZMYND8 were subsequently confirmed in clinical samples. Furthermore, our study verified that antisense oligonucleotide therapy targeting TROJAN substantially suppressed TNBC progression in vivo. In conclusion, the long noncoding RNA TROJAN promotes TNBC progression and serves as a potential therapeutic target.

Transcriptome analysis of luminal breast cancer reveals a role for LOL in tumor progression and tamoxifen resistance.

Luminal breast cancer (BC) has a sustained risk of late disease recurrence and death. Considerable numbers of patients suffer from antiendocrine therapy resistance. Here, we identified a novel lncRNA whose expression is high in breast cancer and especially higher in luminal breast cancer, dubbed LOL (lncRNA of luminal), that acts as a natural sponge for let-7 microRNAs to regulate tumor growth and tamoxifen resistance. LOL overexpression in parental MCF-7 cells exhibited a proliferative advantage in the addition of tamoxifen than negative control. Knocking down LOL in TamR MCF-7 cells, recovered the sensitivity of cells to tamoxifen. Strikingly, we demonstrated that LOL is transcribed from a genomic locus of an enhancer to maintain its high expression in luminal BC and that it is extremely sensitive to enhancer-regulating factors, such as ZMYND8 and BRD4. Estrogen deprivation or ERα signaling pathway blockage can further stimulate LOL expression, which can promote tumor progression. Clinical analysis of 374 luminal breast cancer samples indicated that LOL is an independent prognostic factor for poor survival in luminal BC. In conclusion, targeting LOL using preclinical/clinical drugs, such as BRD4 inhibitors, may represent a promising approach to inhibit luminal breast cancer progression and tamoxifen resistance.

Metronomic capecitabine combined with aromatase inhibitors for new chemoendocrine treatment of advanced breast cancer: a phase II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the safety and clinical efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy combined with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients who cannot tolerate conventional-dose chemotherapy. METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with HR-positive ABC, who exhibited disease progression after first-line AIs treatment and who could not tolerate or rejected conventional chemotherapy, were enrolled in this study. Patients received capecitabine 500 mg PO TID (could be reduced to 500 mg QD in case of adverse effects) and exemestane 25 mg QD (after PD with letrozole) or letrozole 2.5 mg QD (after PD with exemestane). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerance, the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to treatment failure (TTF). RESULTS: In our analysis of 44 patients, the median age was 64 years (range 38-90) and 68.2% patients had at least two recurrences or metastatic lesions. Grade 3 toxicities (hand-foot syndrome) were observed only in 4 of the patients. Most patients exhibited no or mild toxicities. After a median follow-up of 14.8 months, ORR was 70.5%, CBR-77.3%, PFS-16.2 months, and TTF-14.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Metronomic oral capecitabine combined with AIs showed good efficacy, minimal toxicities, and good tolerance in HR-positive patients with ABC. It is a potential treatment option especially for postmenopausal HR-positive ABC patients in poor general condition who cannot tolerate conventional chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01924078.

Characterization of PIK3CA and PIK3R1 somatic mutations in Chinese breast cancer patients.

Deregulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway contributes to the development and progression of tumors. Here, we determine that somatic mutations in PIK3CA (44%), PIK3R1 (17%), AKT3 (15%), and PTEN (12%) are prevalent and diverse in Chinese breast cancer patients, with 60 novel mutations identified. A high proportion of tumors harbors multiple mutations, especially PIK3CA plus PIK3R1 mutations (9.0%). Next, we develop a recombination-based mutation barcoding (ReMB) library for impactful mutations conferring clonal advantage in proliferation and drug responses. The highest-ranking PIK3CA and PIK3R1 mutations include previously reported deleterious mutations, as well as mutations with unknown significance. These PIK3CA and PIK3R1 impactful mutations exhibit a mutually exclusive pattern, leading to oncogenesis and hyperactivity of PI3K pathway. The PIK3CA impactful mutations are tightly associated with hormone receptor positivity. Collectively, these findings advance our understanding of PI3K impactful mutations in breast cancer and have important implications for PI3K-targeted therapy in precision oncology.

PHF5A Epigenetically Inhibits Apoptosis to Promote Breast Cancer Progression.

Alternative splicing (AS) and its regulation play critical roles in cancer, yet the dysregulation of AS and its molecular bases in breast cancer development have not yet been elucidated. Using an in vivo CRISPR screen targeting RNA-binding proteins, we identified PHD finger protein 5A (PHF5A) as a key splicing factor involved in tumor progression. PHF5A expression was frequently upregulated in breast cancer and correlated with poor survival, and knockdown of PHF5A significantly suppressed cell proliferation, migration, and tumor formation. PHF5A was required for SF3b spliceosome stability and linked the complex to histones, and the PHF5A-SF3b complex modulated AS changes in apoptotic signaling. In addition, expression of a short truncated FAS-activated serine/threonine kinase (FASTK) protein was increased after PHF5A ablation and facilitated Fas-mediated apoptosis. This PHF5A-modulated FASTK-AS axis was widely present in breast cancer specimens, particularly those of the triple-negative subtype. Taken together, our findings reveal that PHF5A serves as an epigenetic suppressor of apoptosis and thus provides a mechanistic basis for breast cancer progression and may be a valuable therapeutic target.Significance: This study provides an epigenetic mechanistic basis for the aggressive biology of breast cancer and identifies a translatable therapeutic target. Cancer Res; 78(12); 3190-206. ©2018 AACR.

Sequential versus simultaneous use of chemotherapy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) among estrogen receptor (ER)-positive premenopausal breast cancer patients: effects on ovarian function, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate ovarian function and therapeutic efficacy among estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and chemotherapy simultaneously or sequentially. METHOD: This study was a phase 3, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial (NCT01712893). Two hundred sixteen premenopausal patients (under 45 years) diagnosed with invasive ER-positive breast cancer were enrolled from July 2009 to May 2013 and randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy combined with sequential or simultaneous GnRHa treatment. All patients were advised to receive GnRHa for at least 2 years. The primary outcome was the incidence of early menopause, defined as amenorrhea lasting longer than 12 months after the last chemotherapy or GnRHa dose, with postmenopausal or unknown follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol levels. The menstrual resumption period and survivals were the secondary endpoints. RESULT: The median follow-up time was 56.9 months (IQR 49.5-72.4 months). One hundred and eight patients were enrolled in each group. Among them, 92 and 78 patients had complete primary endpoint data in the sequential and simultaneous groups, respectively. The rates of early menopause were 22.8% (21/92) in the sequential group and 23.1% (18/78) in the simultaneous group [simultaneous vs. sequential: OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.50-2.08); p = 0.969; age-adjusted OR 1.13; (95% CI 0.54-2.37); p = 0.737]. The median menstruation resumption period was 12.0 (95% CI 9.3-14.7) months and 10.3 (95% CI 8.2-12.4) months for the sequential and simultaneous groups, respectively [HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.59-1.16); p = 0.274; age-adjusted HR 0.90 (95%CI 0.64-1.27); p = 0.567]. No significant differences were evident for disease-free survival (p = 0.290) or overall survival (p = 0.514) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: For ER-positive premenopausal patients, the sequential use of GnRHa and chemotherapy showed ovarian preservation and survival outcomes that were no worse than simultaneous use. The application of GnRHa can probably be delayed until menstruation resumption after chemotherapy.

Clinical Significance of Programmed Death Ligand­1 and Intra-Tumoral CD8+ T Lymphocytes in Ovarian Carcinosarcoma.

Ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) accounts for high mortality and lacks effective therapeutic methods. So far, we lack reliable biomarkers capable of predicting the risk of aggressive course of the disease. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is expressed in various tumors, and antibodies targeting its receptor programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) are emerging cancer therapeutics. This study was designed to evaluate the expression of PD-L1 and intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocytes by immunohistochemistry from 19 OCS patients who underwent primary surgery at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The correlations between PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T lymphocytes as well as the patients' clinicopathologic characteristics were integrated and statistically analyzed. PD-L1-positive expression was observed in 52.6% of intraepithelial tissues and 47.4% of mesenchymal tissues (p = 0.370). Meanwhile, intraepithelial and mesenchymal CD8+ T lymphocytes were positive in 36.8% and 84.2% of OCS, respectively (p = 0.628). A significantly negative correlation was found between mesenchymal CD8+ T lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression (r = -0.630, p = 0.011). Intraepithelial PD-L1-positive expression was associated only with positive ascitic fluid (p = 0.008). Mesenchymal PD-L1-positive patients had a poorer survival than those with negative expression (p = 0.036). Meanwhile, intraepithelial PD-L1-positive patients had a better survival trend than PD-L1-negative patients, though no statistical significance was found (p = 0.061). There was a better postoperative survival noted in mesenchymal CD8-positive patients (p = 0.024), and allthough a better trend of OS was observed in intraepithelial CD8-positive patients, no statistical significance was found (p = 0.382). Positive tumoral CD8+ T lymphocytes and mesenchymal PD-L1-negative expression seem to be associated with better survival in OCS. It is possible that immunotherapy targeting PD-L1 pathway could be used in OCS.