ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hip dysplasia is a complex static-dynamic pathology leading to chronic joint instability and osteoarthritis. Because our understanding of the underlying pathomorphologies of hip dysplasia, both on the macro and micro levels, has evolved, an updated definition is needed. QUESTION: What is the definition of hip dysplasia in 2023? METHODS: By summarizing and reviewing relevant literature, we provide an up-to-date definition of hip dysplasia with a guide to appropriately making the diagnosis. RESULTS: In addition to the pathognomonic parameters, supportive and descriptive indicators, as well as secondary changes are used to fully characterize instability inherent in hip dysplasia. The primary diagnostic tool is always the plain anteroposterior pelvis radiograph, which can be supplemented by additional investigations (MRI of the hip with intraarticular contrast agent; CT) if necessary. CONCLUSION: The complexity, subtlety, and diversity of the pathomorphology of residual hip dysplasia requires careful, multilevel diagnosis and treatment planning in specialized centers.
Subject(s)
Hip Dislocation, Congenital , Hip Dislocation , Humans , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Acetabulum/pathology , Hip Dislocation/diagnosis , Osteotomy , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnosisABSTRACT
Background: Several classification systems based on arthroscopy have been used to describe lesions of the ligamentum teres (LT) in young active patients undergoing hip-preserving surgery. Inspection of the LT and associated lesions of the adjuvant fovea capitis and acetabular fossa is limited when done arthroscopically but is much more thorough during open surgical hip dislocation. Therefore, we propose a novel grading system based on our findings during surgical dislocation comprising the full spectrum of ligamentous-fossa-foveolar complex (LFFC) lesions. Purpose: To determine (1) intraobserver reliability and (2) interobserver reproducibility of our new grading system. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We performed this validation study on 211 hips (633 images in total) with surgical hip dislocation (2013-2021). We randomly selected 5 images per grade for each LFFC item to achieve an equal representation of all grades (resulting in 75 images). The ligament, fossa, and fovea were subcategorized into normal, inflammation, degeneration, partial, and complete defects. All surgeries were performed in a standardized way by a single surgeon. The femur was disarticulated using a bone hook, the LT was inspected, documented and resected, then the fossa and fovea were documented with the femoral head in full dislocation using a 70° arthroscope. Six observers with different levels of expertise in hip-preserving surgery independently conducted the measurements twice, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine (1) intraobserver reliability and (2) interobserver reproducibility of the novel grading system. Results: For intraobserver reliability, excellent ICCs were found in both the junior and the experienced raters for grading the ligament, fossa, fovea, and total LFFC (ICCs ranged from 0.91 to 0.99 for the LFFC score). We found excellent interobserver reproducibility between raters for all items of the LFFC (all interobserver ICCs ≥ 0.76). Conclusion: Our new grading system for lesions of the LFFC is highly reliable and reproducible. It covers the full spectrum of damage more precisely than arthroscopic classifications do and offers a scientific basis for standardized intraoperative evaluation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is a fast and patient-friendly modality to assess cartilage thickness. However, inconsistent results regarding accuracy have been reported. Therefore, we asked what are (1) the accuracy, (2) reproducibility, and (3) reliability of ultrasonographic cartilage thickness measurement using contrast-enhanced micro-CT for validation? METHODS: A series of 50 cartilage-bone plugs were harvested from fresh bovine and porcine joints. Ultrasonic cartilage thickness was determined using an A-mode, 20-MHz hand-held ultrasonic probe with native (1580 m/s) and adjusted speed of sound (1696 m/s). All measurements were performed by two observers at two different occasions. Angle of insonation was controlled by tilting the device and recording minimal thickness. Retrieval of exact location for measurement was facilitated by aligning the circular design of both cartilage-bone plug and ultrasonic device. There was no soft tissue interference between cartilage surface and ultrasonic probe. Ground truth measurement was performed using micro-CT with iodine contrast agent and a voxel size of 16 µm. The mean cartilage thickness was 1.383 ± 0.402 mm (range, 0.588-2.460 mm). RESULTS: Mean accuracy was 0.074 ± 0.061 mm (0.002-0.256 mm) for native and 0.093 ± 0.098 mm (0.000-0.401 mm) for adjusted speed of sound. Bland-Altman analysis showed no systematic error. High correlation was found for native and adjusted speed of sound with contrast-enhanced micro-CT (both r = 0.973; p < 0.001). A perfect agreement for reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.992 and 0.994) and reliability (ICC 0.993, 95% confidence interval 0.990-0.995) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic cartilage thickness measurement could be shown to be highly accurate, reliable, and reproducible. The A-mode ultrasonic cartilage thickness measurement is a fast and patient-friendly modality which can detect early joint degeneration and facilitate decision making in joint preserving surgery.
