[Analysis of healthcare for patients with cardiovascular diseases in Russian Federation in comparison with the practice of Europe and USA].

The medical community, researchers and healthcare organizers are constantly challenged by comparing key indexes reflecting the effectiveness of cardiovascular care, primarily for the dynamic assessment and implementation of the world's best practices to reduce cardiovascular mortality. The analysis of health care for patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is a complex, multicomponent process, the structure and key tools of which differ from country to country. Using different data sources, methodological and analytical approaches creates certain limitations and barriers to the assessment. In order to update the ideas about the modern coordinate system and tools for assessing cardiovascular care, the authors presented practices for analyzing major indexes in Russia, European countries, and the United States. The review presents sources of statistical data, principles for assessing risk factors, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and specific features of monitoring the availability and quality of cardiovascular care.

[Blood pressure telemonitoring and remote counseling in uncontrolled hypertension].

Telehealth is a useful adjunct in hypertension (HTN) management. Despite obvious short-term clinical benefit, long-term social impact and cost-effectiveness have not been fully investigated. AIM: Predictive modeling of long-term clinical and social outcomes and the cost-effectiveness analysis of blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring and remote counseling (BPTM) in patients with HTN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov cohort-based (1000 patients in each study arm) model was developed and adopted a 10-year time horizon with 12-month time cycles. Cost and outcome data collected from the three-month study of 240 patients (160 in BPTM group and 80 controls, 48 y.o.). All patients started at a non-complicated HTN well state with a certain possibility of disease progression in a number of health states over a discrete time period. BPTM was compared with usual care in terms of 10-year healthcare costs, quality adjusted life years (QALY) using a Ministry of Health of Russian Federation perspective. RESULTS: In the long-term run when compared with usual care BPTM was more effective in terms mortality (67 versus 91 patients lost and 9.6 versus 9.71 life years gained) and costs (cost of illness 102 508 000 RUR versus 145 237 700 RUR). Taking quality of life measures into account, the effect of BPTM was also more pronounced (8.31 versus 7.82 QALYs gained). The resultant incremental cost-utility ratio for BPTM was 275 178.98 RUR/1 QALY gained/1 patient (134 837.70 RUR/0.49 QALY/1 patient). CONCLUSION: According to the results of predictive modeling, implementation of BPTM into clinical practice is likely lead to reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a cost-effective way.

[Features of antihypertensive therapy and real-world prescription of selective imidazoline receptor agonists in Russia vs other countries: STRAIGHT study data analysis].

Analysis of routine clinical practice of hypertensive patient management represents one of the important tools in the search for further ways to minimize hypertension-associated cardiovascular and renal adverse outcomes. AIM: To compare the strategies for hypertension management and features of clinical use of I1-imidazoline receptor (I1-IR) agonists in the Russian Federation and other countries where the STRAIGHT (Selective imidazoline receptor agonists Treatment Recommendation and Action In Global management of HyperTension) study was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a cross-sectional online study involving physicians of various specializations. The study was conducted from January 18 to July 1, 2019, in seven countries with a high rate of I1-IR agonist prescription, including Russia. RESULTS: A total of 125 (4.5%) responders filled out the survey in the Russian Federation, which was somewhat lower than in other countries (6.8%). The participants were mostly general practitioners (54.0%) and cardiologists (42.0%), while in other countries greater diversity was seen. Most Russian physicians (83.0%) seemed to rely on national clinical guidelines in their routine practice, while in other countries the US guidelines were more popular (66.0%). The majority of responders stated that they took into account the traditional risk factors of hypertension when initiating the therapy; every second responder noted if sleep apnea was present. Awareness of I1-IR agonists, their prescription rate and their preference were higher in Russia. The main reported benefits of I1-IR agonists were their efficacy, including in resistant hypertension, and their metabolic effects (in Russia). Most participants preferred I1-IR agonists as third-line therapy (65.0% in Russia vs 60.0% in other countries) and in combination with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) (55.0% in Russia vs 54.0% in other countries). Compared to responders from other countries, Russian physicians prescribe I1-IR agonists as first-line (15.0% vs 5.0%) and second-line (48.0% vs 21.0%) therapy more often. CONCLUSION: Russian physicians were the most aware of I1-IR agonists and tended to prescribe drugs of this class for hypertension management more often, and I1-IR agonist combination with ACEi was preferable compared to physician responders from other countries. Antihypertensive efficacy and metabolic effects were reported as the major benefits of I1-IR agonist therapy.

[Assessment of the clinical efficacy of telemonitoring and distant counseling in patients with uncontrolled hypertension].

The aim of the study was to investigate the mathematical correlation of the clinical efficacy of blood pressure telemonitoring and distant counseling (BPTM) in patients in uncontrolled hypertension (HTN). Telehealth tools are widely used in HTN management. However clinical efficacy of such interventions assessed mainly in groups investigated without its populational and attributable impact. Materials and methods. The total of 240 patients were included, then randomized in 2:1 manner to BPTM group (n=160, median age 47 y.o.) and control group (n=80, median age 49 y.o). The user - friendly and secure telehealth software was provided with mobile application (patients) and desktop (doctors) platforms which allowed storage and analysis of self-BP monitoring data and remote consultations. A three - month surveillance was designed with mandatory baseline and final face - to - face visits with the assessment of office systolic BP (oSBP). Mathematical evaluation was based on target SBP rates achieved in comparator groups and included the absolute efficacies (AE), the attributable efficacy (AtE), the relative efficacy (RE) and the population attributable efficacy (PAtE). Results. BPTM group characterized by larger decrease in SBP level compared with controls (-16.8±2.9 mm Hg versus -7.9±3.9 mm Hg; p.

[Optimization of BP Control and Arterial Elasticity With Fixed Combination Therapy Perindopril and Amlodipine In Patients With Arterial Hypertension and Increased Pulse Wave Velocity].

The aim of the study was to assess the possibility of fixed combination perindopril+amlodipine to improve arterial elesticity in patients with hypertension and high pulse wave velocity, despite previous combination antihypertensive therapy. In an open, multicenter, observational study duration of 24 weeks 80 patients were included, divided into 4 equal-sized groups, depending on initial antihypertensive therapy: Group 1 - the combination of ACE inhibitor and diuretic, Group 2 - the combination of ACE inhibitor and calcium channel blocker, Group 3 - the combination of diuretic and angiotensin receptor blocker, Group 4 - the combination of angiotensin receptor blocker and calcium antagonist. All patients underwent ambulatory BP monitoring, applanation tonometry (assessment of augmentation index and central blood pressure), pulse wave velocity measurement. According to the office BP measurements fixed combination perindopril+amlodipine provided the SBP reduction by 17.5%, 15.6%, 15, 6%, 15.5% and 17.7%, DBP reduction by 14.6%, 12.9%, 13.8%, respectively, in groups ACEI+D initial combination therapy, ACEI+AC initial combination therapy, ARB+D initial combination therapy, ARB+AC initial combination therapy. According ABPM data SBP has been decreased by 12.2%, 12.4%, 11.3%, 12.6% and DBP by 14.3%, 11.1%, 8.9%, 12.6%. The fixed combination perindopril+amlodipine reduced PWV by 25.2%, 21.6%, 23.1%, 23.0%, augmentation index by 43.4%, 48.9%, 41.5%, 38.3%, central SBP by 16.1%, 15.5%, 14.4%, 15.2%, the central DBP by 15.1%, 13.8%, 13.8%, 18.0% (p<0.01 vs. baseline). CONCLUSIONS: Fixed combination perindopril+amlodipine provides goal blood pressure control, improves arterial elasticity indexes (augmentation index, PWV, central blood pressure). Additional properties include reduction of BMI and lipid metabolism improving in patients initially treated with a combination antihypertensive therapy.

Marinobufagenin in hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Although obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for hypertension, the underlying mechanisms are not clearly understood. Apnea and hypopnea episodes during sleep lead to sympathoactivation, decrease plasma pH, and predispose to sodium and volume retention. We hypothesized that, the latter could stimulate digitalis-like natriuretic/vasopressor hormones, endogenous ouabain (EO) and marinobufagenin (MBG). Overnight polysomnography (Embletta) and 24 hrs blood pressure monitoring (SpaceLab 90207) was conducted in 52 consecutive patients with OSA (51 +/- 8 years; 40 males, 12 females) and in 48 age-matched hypertensive subjects without OSA. According to the polysomnography data, 17 patients had a mild degree of OSA (apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) 5-15), 17 patients-moderate (AHI 15-30) and 18 -severe OSA (AHI >30). Levels of MBG excretion co-varied with OSA severity (0.5 +/- 0.1, 0.9 +/- 0.04 and 1.2 +/- 0.06 nmoles per 24 hrs, respectively), while excretion of EO did not differ in patients with different degrees of OSA severity. Our observations suggest that MBG may be involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension in OSA, and may be a marker of OSA severity.