Psychosocial Diagnosis and Treatment Before and After Organ Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This new clinical practice guideline concerns the psychosocial diagnosis and treatment of patients before and after organ transplantation. Its objective is to establish standards and to issue evidence-based recommendations that will help to optimize decision making in psychosocial diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: For each key question, the literature was systematically searched in at least two databases (Medline, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and CENTRAL). The end date of each search was between August 2018 and November 2019, depending on the question. The literature search was also updated to capture recent publications, by using a selective approach. RESULTS: Lack of adherence to immunosuppressant drugs can be expected in 25-30% of patients and increases the odds of organ loss after kidney transplantation (odds ratio 7.1). Psychosocial interventions can significantly improve adherence. Metaanalyses have shown that adherence was achieved 10-20% more frequently in the intervention group than in the control group. 13-40% of patients suffer from depression after transplantation; mortality in this group is 65% higher. The guideline group therefore recommends that experts in psychosomatic medicine, psychiatry, and psychology (mental health professionals) should be involved in patient care throughout the transplantation process. CONCLUSION: The care of patients before and after organ transplantation should be multidisciplinary. Nonadherence rates and comorbid mental disorders are common and associated with poorer outcomes after transplantation. Interventions to improve adherence are effective, although the pertinent studies display marked heterogeneity and a high risk of bias.

[Quality of Life and Experienced Distress of Patients Suspected of having a Rare (Chronic) Health Condition - Initial Findings from the ZSE-DUO Study]. / Lebensqualität und erlebte Belastungen von Patient*innen mit Verdacht auf eine Seltene Erkrankung ­ erste Erkenntnisse aus der ZSE-DUO Studie.

OBJECTIVE: Patients suspected of having a rare (chronic) health condition have often gone a long way within the healthcare system. To date, little is known about the health-related quality of life of this group of patients. The study aims to describe the health-related quality of life and the perceived distress of patients suspected of having a rare (chronic) health condition and compare the results with standard values of the German population. METHODS: Eighty patients suspected of having a rare (chronic) health condition were recruited in the nationwide intervention study "ZSE-DUO" and reported their health-related quality of life and perceived distress using the SF-8 and the Distress-Thermometer. RESULTS: The patients rated all eight dimensions of quality of life as well as the physical and mental component scores of the SF-8 significantly lower than the general population. On average, the perceived distress was rated significantly higher. More than 90% of the sample indicated distress in the clinical range. Exhaustion, pain, limited mobility as well as worries and fears were mentioned most frequently as concrete problems, with percentages ranging from 73% to 90% of the total sample. DISCUSSION: In comparison to German reference data, patients suspected of having a rare (chronic) health condition report a massive impairment of their quality of life and a high burden, which is especially characterized by physical and emotional problems. The lack of a diagnosis could explain the high proportion of emotional problems, as it can create a form of legitimation of one's own disease experience. CONCLUSION: The present results underline the need for research on the psychosocial impact of the possible presence of a rare (chronic) health condition. The high distress and the impact on the physical and psychological quality of life domains also highlight the need for care in this patient group.