Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hum Reprod Sci ; 15(3): 300-306, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36341012

ABSTRACT

Background: Over half of all fatal complications occur during primary laparoscopic entry. In our practice, we developed a novel modification of closed LUQ entry at Palmer's point and designated it "E-Z" entry. Aims: To evaluate the risks and safety of left subcostal entry, a technique we have designated 'E-Z' entry at our institution. Settings and Design: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary care medical centre of patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures by a single surgeon known to perform left subcostal entry for the last 10 years, using the E-Z entry technique. Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart review and description of surgical technique. Statistical Analysis Used: Simple descriptive statistics and univariate two-group comparisons. Results: One hundred ninety-eight laparoscopic cases were identified as performed by a single surgeon in the last 10 years: 149 underwent umbilical entry and 49 underwent E-Z entry. The average number of previous abdominal surgeries was higher in the E-Z entry group compared to the umbilical group, 1.3 versus 0.5, respectively (P = 0.003). The umbilical entry group had no complications. One complication was noted with the E-Z entry technique, in which the Veress needle was noted to perforate the liver capsule but was managed expectantly. Conclusion: We propose the E-Z entry technique for Veress needle entry as an ergonomic and easily reproducible entry technique in the left upper quadrant in the setting of suspected intraperitoneal adhesions.

2.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 29(4): 276-281, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28594646

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the use and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. This review summarizes surgical options for management of POP with special emphasis on minimally invasive surgical approach and discusses the recent experience and feasibility of integrating robot-assisted technology. RECENT FINDINGS: Minimally invasive approaches have equal efficacy and less morbidity than laparotomy for POP repair, particularly apical prolapse. Robotics may facilitate the rate of minimally invasive surgery for POP repair with greater cost and as yet no proven superiority for conventional laparoscopy. SUMMARY: Minimally invasive surgery is the preferred approach to POP repair. Conventional laparoscopic or robotic sacral colpopexy is recommended for apical defect and procidentia.


Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Pelvic Floor/surgery , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Robotics , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Surgical Mesh , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/prevention & control , Uterus/surgery , Vagina/surgery
3.
J Am Soc Cytopathol ; 3(1): 42-48, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31051729

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge about the prevalence and distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in cervical premalignant and malignant lesions is crucial to guide development of clinical management strategies and prophylactic vaccines. The aim of this study was to determine HPV genotype-specific prevalence and distribution in an underserved cohort of Latino women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 2009 to April 2011, 808 SurePath cervicovaginal specimens were collected from women who were referred from charity clinics for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. The patients' average age was 36.5 years (range 19-85 years). The specimens were tested for HPV genotypes by DNA microarray and sequencing assays. RESULTS: The HPV infection rate was extremely high (93% for any HPV and 64% for high-risk [HR]-HPV), with frequent multiple-strain infection (39%). Younger age (<30 years) was associated with frequent HR-HPV infection, multiple strain infections, and cytologic abnormalities. When compared with previous reports, HPV 16 remained the most common genotype (44.6%) in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; however, a significant increase in HPV 31 (17.9%) and 45 (10.7%) and a decrease in HPV 35, 52, 33, and 66 were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The HPV genotype-specific prevalence and distribution pattern in this cohort of underserved Latino women differed significantly from previously published data in the United States. Understanding the potentially changing trends in HPV distribution pattern will help guide the development of appropriate preventive and therapeutic strategies for both underserved and general populations.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...