Split-bolus single-phase cardiac multidetector computed tomography for reliable detection of left atrial thrombus: comparison to transesophageal echocardiography.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of a new cardiac MDCT protocol using a split-bolus contrast injection protocol and single MDCT scan for reliable diagnosis of LA/LAA thrombi in comparison to TEE, optimizing radiation exposure and use of contrast agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 182 consecutive patients with drug refractory AF scheduled for PVI (62.6 % male, mean age: 64.1 ±â€Š10.2 years) underwent routine diagnostic work including TEE and cardiac MDCT for the evaluation of LA/LAA anatomy and thrombus formation between November 2010 and March 2012. Contrast media injection was split into a pre-bolus of 30 ml and main bolus of 70 ml iodinated contrast agent separated by a short time delay. RESULTS: In this study, split-bolus cardiac MDCT identified 14 of 182 patients with filling defects of the LA/LAA. In all of these 14 patients, abnormalities were found in TEE. All 5 of the 14 patients with thrombus formation in cardiac MDCT were confirmed by TEE. CONCLUSION: MDCT was 100 % accurate for thrombus, with strong but not perfect overall results for SEC equivalent on MDCT. KEY POINTS: • Patients with no filling defect or thrombus in MDCT in the LA/LAA region are unlikely to have thrombus and may undergo PVI without TEE.• Here, the role of an additional TEE in pre-procedural management prior to PVI in patients with AF has to be redefined.• Using a split-bolus injection protocol increases the diagnostic accuracy of thrombus in the LA/LAA region.

Current role of cardiac and extra-cardiac pathologies in clinically indicated cardiac computed tomography with emphasis on status before pulmonary vein isolation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of cardiac and significant extra-cardiac findings in clinical computed tomography of the heart in patients with atrial fibrillation before pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 224 patients (64 ±â€Š10 years; male 63 %) with atrial fibrillation were examined by cardiac 64-slice multidetector CT before PVI. Extra-cardiac findings were classified as "significant" if they were recommended to additional diagnostics or therapy, and otherwise as "non-significant". Additionally, cardiac findings were documented in detail. RESULTS: A total of 724 cardiac findings were identified in 203 patients (91 % of patients). Additionally, a total of 619 extra-cardiac findings were identified in 179 patients (80 % of patients). Among these extra-cardiac findings 196 (32 %) were "significant", and 423 (68 %) were "non-significant". In 2 patients (1 %) a previously unknown malignancy was detected (esophageal cancer and lung cancer, local stage, no metastasis). 203 additional imaging diagnostics followed to clarify the "significant" findings (124 additional CT, costs 38 314.69 US dollars). Overall, there were 3.2 cardiac and 2.8 extra-cardiac findings per patient. Extra-cardiac findings appear significantly more frequently in patients over 60 years old, in smokers and in patients with a history of cardiac findings (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: Cardiac CT scans before PVI should be screened for extracardiac incidental findings that could have important clinical implications for each patient.

[Serious complications following gluteal injection of silicone]. / Schwere Komplikationen nach glutealer Silikoninjektion.

Silicone has a broad range of medical applications and plays an important role, for example, in plastic reconstruction. The use of silicone, however, may result in unpredictable consequences for the patient. These range from swelling and erythema at the site of injection and regional lymphadenopathy to the development of disseminated granulomas distant from the administration site. We report a woman who developed extensive distally-spreading ulcerations in both buttocks several years after gluteal silicone injection. Potential systemic reactions of silicone include intrapulmonary granulomas, embolism and related pneumonitis. Moreover, an association with the development of autoimmune diseases and neoplasias has been discussed. Therapeutic options include surgically removing the silicone and topical or systemic anti-inflammatory drug therapy. However, due to the diffuse dissemination of silicone, the former is often not completely possible and for the latter empirical data are limited and follow-up studies are missing. Liquid silicone is no longer authorized in Europe or in the U.S.A. When silicone implants are used, the decision should be weighed carefully and the patient adequately counseled. In addition, follow-up care on a regular basis is mandatory for both those with implants and those who obtained injections of liquid silicone in the past.