ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric hospitals are increasingly being digitalised. Digitalisation often requires changes at work for health professionals. A positive attitude from health professionals towards technology is crucial for a successful and sustainable digital transformation at work. Nevertheless, insufficient attention is being paid to the health professionals' sentiments towards technology. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the implemented technologies in psychiatric hospitals and to describe the health professionals' sentiments towards these implemented technologies. METHODS: A text-mining analysis of semi-structured interviews with nurses, physicians and psychologists was conducted. The analysis comprised word frequencies and sentiment analyses. For the sentiment analyses, the SentimentWortschatz dataset was used. The sentiments ranged from -1 (strongly negative sentiment) to 1 (strongly positive sentiment). RESULTS: In total, 20 health professionals (nurses, physicians and psychologists) participated in the study. When asked about the technologies they used, the participating health professionals mainly referred to the computer, email, phone and electronic health record. Overall, 4% of the words in the transcripts were positive or negative sentiments. Of all words that express a sentiment, 73% were positive. The discussed technologies were associated with positive and negative sentiments. However, of all sentences that described technology at the workplace, 69.4% were negative. CONCLUSIONS: The participating health professionals mentioned a limited number of technologies at work. The sentiments towards technologies were mostly negative. The way in which technologies are implemented and the lack of health professionals' involvement seem to be reasons for the negative sentiments.
Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Information Technology , Humans , Attitude , Data MiningABSTRACT
There is a strong need in long-term care for scientific research, so older people and their families, health care professionals, policy makers, and educators can benefit from new advancements and best available evidence in every day care practice. This paper presents the model of a sustainable and successful interdisciplinary collaboration between scientists, care providers and educators in long-term care: the "Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care" by Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Its mission is to contribute with scientific research to improving i) quality of life of older people and their families; ii) quality of care and iii) quality of work of those working in long-term care. Key working mechanisms are the Linking Pins and interdisciplinary partnership using a team science approach, with great scientific and societal impact. A blueprint for the model is discussed, describing its business model and challenges in getting the model operational and sustainable are discussed.
Subject(s)
Interdisciplinary Communication , Long-Term Care/methods , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life/psychology , Translational Research, Biomedical/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aging , Health Personnel , Home Care Services , Humans , Netherlands , Nursing HomesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Daily life is a dynamic and multidimensional concept, for which appropriate assessment tools are lacking. This study describes the development of the Maastricht Electronic Daily Life Observation tool (MEDLO-tool), a freely accessible, easy to use, electronic observation tool to assess relevant daily life aspects for nursing home residents with dementia. METHODS: (1) Determining relevant aspects of daily life for nursing home residents with dementia based on a literature search and expert interviews; (2) pilot testing observation procedures and operationalizations of the aspects of daily life; and (3) exploring inter-rater reliability and feasibility of the tool in a nursing home facility with 16 residents (56% female, mean age: 77). RESULTS: The following aspects of daily life are assessed with the MEDLO-tool: (1) activity (activity performed by resident, engagement in this activity, and the degree of physical effort); (2) physical environment (location of the resident and interaction with the physical environment); (3) social interaction (the level and type of social interaction, and with whom this social interaction took place); and (4) emotional well-being (mood and agitation). Each aspect of daily life is observed and scored using standardized scoring options. Agreement on the aspects is high with an average absolute agreement of 86%. Users of the MEDLO-tool indicated that it was feasible in practice and contained clear operationalization of the aspects of daily life. CONCLUSIONS: The MEDLO-tool is a promising tool to gain real time insight into the aspects of the daily lives of nursing home residents with dementia.
Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Homes for the Aged , Nursing Homes , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dementia/psychology , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In nursing home care, new care environments directed towards small-scale and homelike environments are developing. The green care farm, which provides 24-h nursing home care for people with dementia, is one such new care environment. Knowledge is needed on the relation between environmental features of green care farms such as nature, domesticity and offering care in small groups and the influence on the daily lives of residents. The aim of this study is to explore (1) the daily lives of residents, (2) the quality of care and (3) the experiences of caregivers on green care farms compared with other nursing home care environments. METHODS/DESIGN: An observational longitudinal study including a baseline and a six-month follow-up measurement is carried out. Four types of nursing home care environments are included: (1) large scale nursing home ward, (2) small scale living facility on the terrain of a larger nursing home (3) stand-alone small scale living facility and (4) green care farm. Quality of care is examined through structure, process and outcome indicators. The primary outcome measure is the daily life of residents, assessed by ecological momentary assessments. Aspects of daily life include (1) activity (activity performed by the resident, the engagement in this activity and the degree of physical effort); (2) physical environment (the location of the resident and the interaction with the physical environment); (3) social environment (the level and type of social interaction, and with whom this social interaction took place) and (4) psychological well-being (mood and agitation). In addition, social engagement, quality of life, behavioral symptoms and agitation are evaluated through questionnaires. Furthermore, demographics, cognitive impairment, functional dependence and the severity of dementia are assessed. Semi-structured interviews are performed with caregivers regarding their experiences with the different nursing home care environments. DISCUSSION: This is the first study investigating green care farms providing 24-h nursing home care for people with dementia. The study provides valuable insight into the daily lives of residents, the quality of care, and the experiences of caregivers at green care farms in comparison with other nursing home care environments including small-scale care environments and large scale nursing home wards.
Subject(s)
Agriculture , Behavioral Symptoms/prevention & control , Caregivers/psychology , Dementia , Homes for the Aged/organization & administration , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Dementia/psychology , Dementia/therapy , Female , Health Facility Environment/methods , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Netherlands , Social Environment , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Institutional dementia care is increasingly directed towards small-scale and homelike care environments, in The Netherlands as well as abroad. In these facilities, a small number of residents, usually six to eight, live together, and normal daily household activities and social participation are emphasized. In a quasi-experimental study, we studied the effects of small-scale, homelike care environments on residents (n = 259), family caregivers (n = 206) and nursing staff (n = 305). We compared two types of institutional nursing care during a 1 year period (baseline assessment and follow-up measurements at 6 and 12 months): (28) small-scale, homelike care environments and (21) psychogeriatric wards in traditional nursing homes. A matching procedure was applied to increase comparability of residents at baseline regarding functional status and cognition. This study was unable to demonstrate convincing overall effects of small-scale, homelike care facilities. On our primary outcome measures, such as quality of life and behaviour of residents and job satisfaction and motivation of nursing staff, no differences were found with traditional nursing homes. We conclude that small-scale, homelike care environments are not necessarily a better care environment than regular nursing homes and other types of living arrangements should be considered carefully. This provides opportunities for residents and their family caregivers to make a choice which care facility suits their wishes and beliefs best.
Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Dementia/nursing , Nursing Staff/psychology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Social Environment , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dementia/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Group Homes/standards , Homes for the Aged/standards , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Long-Term Care/psychology , Long-Term Care/standards , Male , Netherlands , Nursing Homes/standards , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
Pain occurs regularly among nursing home residents with dementia. There are indications that appliance of structural pain assessment can contribute to the adequate diagnosis of pain. The aim of this study is to gain insight into applied interventions after diagnosing pain with an observational pain scale (PACSLAC-D) among nursing home resident with dementia. During a six week period pain was measured twice a week, among 22 residents of a psychogeriatric nursing home ward, using the PACSLAC-D. Interventions undertaken as a result of a pain score were inventoried on a data-sheet. After the third and sixth week implementation of pain assessment was evaluated. In total 264 pain assessments using the PACSLAC-D were conducted. Of all scheduled standardized measurements 90% was completed. Sixty observations resulted in a pain score. Completed datasheets (N=39) showed that a pain score often (N=17) did not result in any intervention. The majority of interventions that were undertaken consisted of a non pharmacological approach (N=19). Evaluation meetings indicated that the PACSLAC-D was considered useful, though the chosen procedure of standardized measurements twice a week was not yet ideal. This study demonstrates that although there was a high compliance rate, pain relieving interventions were not frequently applied.
Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Dementia/psychology , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Homes for the Aged , Humans , Male , Nursing Homes , Pain/psychology , Pain Measurement/instrumentation , Pilot Projects , Psychometrics/methodsABSTRACT
INTERVENTIONS AFTER DIAGNOSING PAIN IN NURSING HOME RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA: THE PILOT IMPLEMENTATION OF AN OBSERVATIONAL PAIN SCALE (PACSLAC-D): Pain occurs regularly among nursing home residents with dementia. There are indications that appliance of structural pain assessment can contribute to the adequate diagnosis of pain. The aim of this study is to gain insight into applied interventions after diagnosing pain with an observational pain scale (PACSLAC-D) among nursing home resident with dementia.During a six week period pain was measured twice a week, among 22 residents of a psychogeriatric nursing home ward, using the PACSLAC-D. Interventions undertaken as a result of a pain score were inventoried on a datasheet. After the third and sixth week implementation of pain assessment was evaluated.In total 264 pain assessments using the PACSLAC-D were conducted. Of all scheduled standardized measurements 90% was completed. Sixty observations resulted in a pain score. Completed datasheets (N=39) showed that a pain score often (N=17) did not result in any intervention. The majority of interventions that were undertaken consisted of a non pharmacological approach (N=19). Evaluation meetings indicated that the PACSLAC-D was considered useful, though the chosen procedure of standardized measurements twice a week was not yet ideal.This study demonstrates that although there was a high compliance rate, pain relieving interventions were not frequently applied.Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 2011; 42: 67-78.
