Results of a phase I trial to assess the safety of macitentan in combination with temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for additional therapies to treat recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Preclinical studies suggest that high dose macitentan, an oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist, enhances the cytotoxic effects of temozolomide (TMZ) in GBM, improving survival. This phase I trial investigated the maximum tolerated dose of macitentan combined with TMZ in patients with recurrent GBM and assessed the safety and tolerability of high dose macitentan in these patients (NCT01499251). METHODS: Adults with recurrent GBM received ascending doses of macitentan from 30 mg once daily concomitantly with TMZ. Safety and tolerability were assessed in addition to exploratory efficacy and pharmacokinetic endpoints. An ancillary study examined biomarker expression following macitentan treatment prior to surgical resection of recurrent GBM. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with recurrent GBM were administered macitentan doses up to 300 mg once daily; no dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and a maximum tolerated dose was not determined. All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), the majority associated with GBM or TMZ treatment. TEAEs related to macitentan and TMZ were reported for 16 (42.1%) and 26 (68.4%) patients, respectively, with no serious macitentan-related TEAEs. Macitentan concentrations increased with dose, with no plateau in exposure. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the expression of efficacy biomarkers within tumors. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival across all dose groups was 9.4 (95% CI 8.5, 13.4) months. CONCLUSION: High-dose macitentan was well tolerated in recurrent GBM patients concomitantly receiving TMZ. TEAEs were consistent with those seen in patients receiving either drug individually.

Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and Safety of Murepavadin, a Novel Antipseudomonal Antibiotic, in Subjects with Mild, Moderate, or Severe Renal Function Impairment.

This open-label, nonrandomized, single-dose, phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of murepavadin, a novel peptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The study was conducted in 32 subjects of either sex in 4 groups (up to 8 per group) with mild (group 1), moderate (group 2), and severe (group 3) renal function impairment or with normal renal function (group 4). The degree of renal impairment of the subjects was classified at screening according to the estimated creatinine clearance (CLCr) according to the Cockcroft-Gault equation. All subjects received a single 2.2-mg/kg of body weight intravenous infusion of murepavadin administered over 3 h. Exposure to murepavadin in plasma increased in subjects with renal function impairment, with the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) increasing about 2.0- to 2.5-fold for subjects with renal function impairment compared to subjects with normal renal function, whereas the increases in maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) were about 1.5-fold for subjects with renal function impairment compared to subjects with normal renal function. The total clearance (CL) of murepavadin was lower in all groups of subjects with renal function impairment, with group means ranging from 2.4 liters/h to 3.8 liters/h, compared to 7.0 liters/h in subjects with normal renal function. Accordingly, the terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) prolonged up to 24 h with decreasing renal function compared to 7.7 h in subjects with normal renal function. Murepavadin was well tolerated in all renal function groups. As the elimination of murepavadin is affected by renal function, a dose adjustment is warranted in subjects with impaired renal function. (This paper has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02110459.).

Lucerastat, an Iminosugar for Substrate Reduction Therapy: Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Fabry Disease on Enzyme Replacement.

Lucerastat is a glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor aimed at reducing production of glycosphingolipids (GSLs), including those accumulating in Fabry disease. The safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of oral lucerastat were evaluated in an exploratory study in patients with Fabry disease. In this single-center, open-label, randomized study, 10 patients received lucerastat 1,000 mg b.i.d. for 12 weeks in addition to enzyme replacement therapy (ERT; the lucerastat group). Four patients with Fabry disease received ERT only. Eight patients reported 17 adverse events (AEs) in the lucerastat group. No clinically relevant safety abnormalities were observed. The mean (SD) levels of the plasma GSLs, glucosylceramide, lactosylceramide, and globotriaosylceramide, were significantly decreased from baseline in the lucerastat group (-49.0% (16.5%), -32.7% (13.0%), and -55.0% (10.4%), respectively). Lucerastat 1,000 mg b.i.d. was well tolerated in patients with Fabry disease over 12 weeks. A marked decrease in plasma GSLs was observed, suggesting clinical potential for lucerastat in patients with Fabry disease.

Lucerastat, an Iminosugar for Substrate Reduction Therapy: Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and Safety in Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Renal Function Impairment.

Lucerastat, an inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, has the potential for substrate reduction therapy in glycosphingolipid storage disorders such as Fabry disease. In pharmacokinetic studies in rats, dogs, and healthy subjects, the main route of elimination was renal. The pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of lucerastat were evaluated in subjects with mild (group A), moderate (group B), and severe (group C) renal impairment. Group D included healthy subjects. Thirty-two subjects (8 per group) were included in this single-center, open-label study and received a single oral dose of 1000 mg lucerastat in groups A and B and 500 mg in groups C and D. The degree of renal impairment of the subjects was based on estimated glomerular filtration rate. Plasma lucerastat concentrations (dose-corrected) were higher in groups B and C compared to group D. The elimination phase half-life was slower in groups B (9.6 hours) and C (16.1 hours) compared to group D (7.0 hours). Increased exposure to lucerastat was observed in subjects from groups B and C with ratio of geometric means (90%CI) of 1.60 (1.29, 1.98) for group B vs D and 3.17 (2.76, 3.65) for group C vs D. There were no clinically relevant abnormalities in vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory values. Four nonserious adverse events were reported by 4 subjects (1 in group A, 3 in group D). Lucerastat was well tolerated in all dose groups. Dose adjustment is warranted in subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment.

Effect of Hepatic or Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Ponesimod, a Selective S1P1 Receptor Modulator.

Ponesimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator, is a potential therapeutic agent for autoimmune disorders. The impact of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of ponesimod and its inactive metabolites, ACT-204426 and ACT-338375, was evaluated. Two separate single-centre, open-label studies with 32 (hepatic study) and 24 (renal study) male and female individuals were conducted. Hepatic impairment was based on the Child-Pugh classification, and renal impairment was determined by creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Individuals with severe hepatic or renal impairment were to be matched (sex and body mass index) with healthy individuals. All individuals received a single dose of 10 mg ponesimod. For ponesimod, the ratio of geometric means of AUC0-∞ for individuals with severe hepatic impairment versus healthy individuals was 3.07 (90% CI: 2.19, 4.32). For severely renally impaired individuals versus healthy individuals, this ratio was 1.14 (0.82, 1.58). Cmax and tmax values of ponesimod were comparable across all groups in both studies. Exposure to metabolites was increased in individuals with moderate or severe hepatic impairment as compared to healthy individuals. During the course of these studies, there were no clinically relevant abnormalities related to vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms and clinical laboratory values. Sixteen adverse events (AEs) were reported, 12 of them of mild intensity. No AEs were considered to be treatment related. Overall, ponesimod was well tolerated. In individuals with renal function impairment, dose adjustment is not warranted, whereas the dose should be reduced in individuals with moderate and severe hepatic impairment.

Recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial.

RATIONALE: Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Adjunctive therapies for sCAP are needed to further improve outcome. A systemic inhibitor of coagulation, tifacogin (recombinant human tissue factor pathway inhibitor) seemed to provide mortality benefit in the sCAP subgroup of a previous sepsis trial. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the impact of adjunctive tifacogin on mortality in patients with sCAP. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-arm study was conducted from July 2005 to June 2008 at 188 centers in North and South America, Europe, South Africa, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Adults with sCAP were randomized to receive a continuous intravenous infusion of tifacogin 0.025 mg/kg/h, tifacogin 0.075 mg/kg/h, or matching placebo over 96 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Severity-adjusted 28-day all-cause mortality. Of 2,138 randomized patients, 946, 238, and 918 received tifacogin 0.025 mg/kg/h, tifacogin 0.075 mg/kg/h, and placebo, respectively. Tifacogin 0.075 mg/kg/h was discontinued after the first interim analysis according to prespecified futility criterion. The 28-day all-cause mortality rates were similar between the 0.025 mg/kg/h (18%) and placebo groups (17.9%) (P = 0.56). Greater reduction in prothrombin fragment 1+2 and thrombin antithrombin complexes levels relative to baseline throughout the first 96 hours was found with tifacogin 0.025 mg/kg/h than with placebo. The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events were comparable between the tifacogin 0.025 mg/kg/h and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tifacogin showed no mortality benefit in patients with sCAP despite evidence of biologic activity.

Efficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: The expression and release of tissue factor is a major trigger for the activation of coagulation in patients with sepsis. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) forms a complex with tissue factor and blood protease factors leading to inhibition of thrombin generation and fibrin formation. OBJECTIVES: To determine if administration of tifacogin (recombinant TFPI) provides mortality benefit in patients with severe sepsis and elevated international normalized ratio (INR) and to assess tifacogin safety in severe sepsis, including patients with low INR. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial conducted from March 21, 2000, through September 27, 2001, in 245 hospitals in 17 countries in North America, Europe, and Israel. PATIENTS: The primary efficacy population consisted of 1754 patients (> or =18 years) with severe sepsis and a high INR (> or =1.2) randomly assigned to intravenous infusion of either tifacogin (0.025 mg/kg per hour for 96 hours, n = 880) or placebo (arginine citrate buffer, n = 874), and 201 patients with a low INR (<1.2) randomly assigned to receive the same dose of either tifacogin or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause 28-day mortality. RESULTS: Overall mortality at 28 days in the tifacogin-treated group (n = 880) vs the placebo group (n = 874) for high INR was 34.2% vs 33.9%, respectively (P =.88, Pearson chi2 test; P =.75, logistic regression model). None of the protocol-specified secondary end points differed between the tifacogin vs placebo groups. An analysis on the first 722 patients demonstrated a mortality rate of 38.9% for placebo vs 29.1% for tifacogin (P =.006, Pearson chi2 test). Tifacogin significantly attenuated prothrombin fragment 1.2 and thrombin:antithrombin complex levels (P<.001, 2-sample t test) in patients with high and low INR. Overall mortality was lower in the tifacogin response in patients with low INR (12%; n = 83) vs placebo (22.9%; n = 118) (P =.051, Pearson chi2 test; P =.03, logistic regression model). There was an increase in serious adverse events with bleeding in the tifacogin group in both cohorts (6.5% tifacogin and 4.8% placebo for high INR; 6.0% tifacogin and 3.3% placebo for low INR). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tifacogin had no effect on all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis and high INR. Tifacogin administration was associated with an increase in risk of bleeding, irrespective of baseline INR.