Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Based Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants.

PURPOSE: The aim of this 1-year randomized trial was to determine the stability and the magnitude of the effect of converting patients' conventional mandibular dentures to implant overdentures (IODs) on their satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). The IODs were retained either with two immediately loaded interconnected standard-diameter implants or with four immediately loaded mini dental implants (MDIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty completely edentulous subjects complaining about insufficient retention of their mandibular dentures were randomly assigned to two groups; 25 patients received IODs retained with four MDIs and 25 patients received IODs retained with two standard-sized tissue level (STL) interconnected implants. All IODs were opposed by conventional maxillary dentures. Patients rated their satisfaction on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and their quality of life on a denture-specific short version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-20) before assignment, and after 3 and 12 months. A two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to assess the change in time and its interaction with treatment mode on patients' overall satisfaction ratings, the total OHIP-20, and their specific domain scores. RESULTS: Immediate loading was possible for all the patients who received the MDIs. By contrast, the immediate loading protocol could be followed for only 15 of the patients allocated to the STL implant group. For the remaining patients, a delayed loading protocol was applied. There was a significant improvement in patients' general satisfaction between baseline and 3 months and between baseline and 12 months postoperatively (F2,44 = 81.006, P < .001). This increase did not differ between the treatment groups (F4,90 = 1.838, P = .128). The results also showed a decrease in mean overall OHIP score (F2,43 = 46.863, P < .001) between baseline and 3 months and between baseline and 12 months postoperatively, indicating a higher level of OHRQoL. In addition, patients scored lower 3 and 12 months after treatment than at baseline for all seven domains. This decrease did not differ between the treatment groups (F4,88 = 0.608, P = .658). CONCLUSION: The results suggested that in terms of patient-based outcomes, mandibular overdentures retained by immediately loaded MDIs can offer an improvement of equal magnitude with that achieved by overdentures retained by standard-sized implants.

Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants.

PURPOSE: The aim of this 1-year randomized trial was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic performance of four immediately loaded mini dental implants (MDIs) and two immediately loaded standard-sized tissue-level (STL) implants, placed in the interforaminal region of the mandible and used to retain mandibular overdentures (IODs) in completely edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 completely edentulous patients wearing conventional maxillary dentures and complaining about insufficient retention of their mandibular dentures were divided into two groups; 25 patients received four MDIs and 25 patients received two STL implants. The marginal bone loss (MBL) at the mesial and distal sides of each implant was assessed by means of standardized intraoral radiographs after a period of 1 year. Implant success and survival rates were also calculated. RESULTS: Immediate loading was possible for all patients in the first group. In the second group, an immediate loading protocol could not be applied for 10 patients. These patients were treated with a delayed loading protocol. A mean MBL of 0.42 ± 0.56 mm for the MDIs and 0.54 ± 0.49 mm for the immediately loaded STL implants was recorded at the end of the evaluation period. There was no statistically significant difference between the MDIs and the immediately loaded STL implants. Two MDIs failed, resulting in a survival rate of 98%. The success rate was 91%. For the immediately loaded conventional implants, the survival rate was 100% and the success rate 96.7% after 1 year of function. However, in 10 patients, the immediate loading protocol could not be followed. CONCLUSION: Considering the limitations of this short-term clinical study, immediate loading of four unsplinted MDIs or two splinted STL implants to retain mandibular overdentures seems to be a feasible treatment option. The marginal bone level changes around the MDIs were well within the clinically acceptable range.

A Pilot Study on Mandibular Overdentures Retained By Mini Dental Implants: Marginal Bone Level Changes and Patient-Based Ratings of Clinical Outcome.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of immediately loaded mini dental implants (MDIs) used to support mandibular overdentures on the peri-implant bone level as well as patients' related levels of satisfaction and quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four MDIs were placed in the interforaminal region of 10 completely edentulous patients, and the implants were loaded immediately (same day) with an overdenture. Radiographic assessment of the bone loss during a period of 18 months was performed by measuring the bone level changes at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant on panoramic radiographs. At the end of this period, patients' satisfaction level on the visual analog scale (VAS) and oral health-related quality of life was assessed by means of questionnaires. RESULTS: A mean bone loss of 1.04 mm on the mesial and distal sides was recorded during the 18-month period after loading of the implants. The score for general satisfaction level was 95.67 ± 5.68. Similarly high VAS scores were given by the patients in all other specific items on patient satisfaction. The total score for the Oral Health Impact Profile-20 (OHIP-20) was 34.07 ± 13.90, which was comparable to that recorded in other studies. CONCLUSION: The short-term radiographic peri-implant bone level changes of MDIs immediately loaded with overdentures in the edentulous mandible were within the physiologic limits. The patients expressed a high level of satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life with this treatment modality.

A Systematic Review on Immediate Loading of Implants Used to Support Overdentures Opposed by Conventional Prostheses: Factors That Might Influence Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Different treatment protocols in terms of number, diameter, and suprastructure design have been proposed for immediately loaded implants that are used to support mandibular overdentures opposed by maxillary conventional dentures. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of these protocols on survival rates as well as clinical and prosthodontic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Several electronic databases were searched for all relevant articles published from 1966 to June 2014. Only randomized controlled trials and prospective studies with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were selected. The primary outcomes of interest were the success and survival rates of the implants. Prosthodontic complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of the studies identified, nine were randomized controlled trials and five were prospective studies. The mean follow-up period was 3 years or less for the vast majority of the studies. The reported survival and success rates were comparable to that of conventional loading for most of the included studies. No specific immediate loading protocol seemed to perform better in terms of clinical and prosthodontic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Immediate loading protocols of mandibular overdentures seem to be a viable alternative to conventional loading. It was not possible to recommend a specific treatment protocol related to the number, diameter of the implants, and attachment system used. Long-term, well-designed studies comparing different immediate loading modalities could help to establish a protocol that delivers the most clinically predictable, efficient, and cost-effective outcome for edentulous patients in need of implant overdentures.