Approaches to drug therapy for COPD in Russia: a proposed therapeutic algorithm.

Until recently, there have been few clinical algorithms for the management of patients with COPD. Current evidence-based clinical management guidelines can appear to be complex, and they lack clear step-by-step instructions. For these reasons, we chose to create a simple and practical clinical algorithm for the management of patients with COPD, which would be applicable to real-world clinical practice, and which was based on clinical symptoms and spirometric parameters that would take into account the pathophysiological heterogeneity of COPD. This optimized algorithm has two main fields, one for nonspecialist treatment by primary care and general physicians and the other for treatment by specialized pulmonologists. Patients with COPD are treated with long-acting bronchodilators and short-acting drugs on a demand basis. If the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is ≥50% of predicted and symptoms are mild, treatment with a single long-acting muscarinic antagonist or long-acting beta-agonist is proposed. When FEV1 is <50% of predicted and/or the COPD assessment test score is ≥10, the use of combined bronchodilators is advised. If there is no response to treatment after three months, referral to a pulmonary specialist is recommended for pathophysiological endotyping: 1) eosinophilic endotype with peripheral blood or sputum eosinophilia >3%; 2) neutrophilic endotype with peripheral blood neutrophilia >60% or green sputum; or 3) pauci-granulocytic endotype. It is hoped that this simple, optimized, step-by-step algorithm will help to individualize the treatment of COPD in real-world clinical practice. This algorithm has yet to be evaluated prospectively or by comparison with other COPD management algorithms, including its effects on patient treatment outcomes. However, it is hoped that this algorithm may be useful in daily clinical practice for physicians treating patients with COPD in Russia.

Safety and immunogenicity of a single dose 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in Russian subjects.

Pneumococcal infection is a major cause of pneumonia, bacteremia, and meningitis. Incidence of pneumococcal disease (PD) varies worldwide. The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) displays an acceptable safety profile and has been demonstrated cost-effective in reducing burden of PD. METHODS: Approximately 100 subjects from the Russian Federation who were either 2 to 49 y of age with increased risk for PD or ≥50 years of age were enrolled into the study (NCT01734239) to receive a single dose of PPV23 administered intramuscularly. Each subject was followed for local and systemic adverse events (AEs) for 5 and 14 days, respectively. Serious AEs were collected for 28 d postvaccination. Blood samples were collected immediately prior to vaccination and 28 d postvaccination for the measurement of IgG to serotypes 1, 6B, 14, 19F, and 23F. RESULTS: High proportion of subjects had ≥2 -fold increase in IgG following receipt of PPV23. Rates were 92.0%, 83.0%, 89.0%, 81%, 84% for serotypes 1, 6B, 14, 19F, and 23F, respectively. Similar rates of responders and increases in the magnitude of immune responses were observed in both age groups (2-49, ≥50 ). PPV23 was generally safe and well tolerated. Injection site and systemic AEs were reported by 14.7% and 18.6% of study subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PPV23 is generally safe, well tolerated, and highly immunogenic when given as a single dose to Russian individuals 50 y of age and older, as well as Russian individuals 2 to 49 y of age who are at high risk for PD.

In-stent restenosis after revascularization of myocardium with drug-eluting stents is accompanied by elevated level of blood plasma eosinophil cationic protein.

The aim of this study was to assess the involvement of eosinophil cationic protein, a marker of eosinophil activation, in the development of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. Follow-up angiography at 6 to 12 months was performed in 32 patients who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents. Blood plasma levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and total immunoglobulin E (IgE) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the level of C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) by high-sensitivity nephelometry. According to angiography data, in-stent restenosis occurred in 13 patients, while 19 patients did not develop it. There were no differences between the hs-CRP and IgE levels in patients with or without restenosis. In contrast, ECP level was higher in patients with restenosis compared with that in patients without restenosis [17.7 ng/mL (11.2-24.0) vs. 9.0 ng/mL (6.4-12.9), p = 0.017]. The incidence of in-stent restenoses was 63% in patients with ECP level higher than or equal to 11 ng/mL, and 19% in patients with an ECP level lower than 11 ng/mL (p = 0.019). These findings suggest that elevated eosinophil activation may play an important role in the pathogenesis of in-stent restenosis after implantation of drug-eluting stents.