Assessment of large-diameter and small-diameter SoftK specialty contact lenses for early-stage keratoconus.

INTRODUCTION: Soft contact lenses may be a good alternative for early-stage keratoconus (KC) patients who do not tolerate rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses due to ocular discomfort or complications. This prospective study compared outcomes obtained after 2 weeks of wearing two types of soft silicone hydrogel contact lenses for keratoconus that varied in their diameter and central thickness (cc). METHODS: Patients with Amsler-Krumeich grades I or II KC were fitted with small-diameter (14.2 or 14.8 mm) SoftK (SD-SoftK, cc = 0.48 mm) and large-diameter (17 mm) SoftK (LD-SoftK, cc = 0.60 mm) lenses, each worn for 2 weeks in a crossover design. Low (10%;10VA) and high (100%;100VA) contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (CS, Pelli-Robson), higher order aberrations (HOAs, Visionix Vx130), the number of trial lens modifications during fitting and the subjectively preferred lens were compared using Friedman tests with post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Forty eyes (N = 20, 10 males, mean age: 39.0 ± 9.9 years, range: 23-55 years) were examined. Their habitual median (interquartile1, interquartile3) 10VA (LogMAR), 100VA (LogMAR) and CS (LogCS) were 0.52 (0.30, 0.50), 0.14 (0.10, 0.15) and 1.35 (1.35, 1.50), respectively. For the SD-SoftK condition, the values were 0.23 (0.17, 0.30), 0.02 (0.00, 0.05) and 1.50 (1.50, 1.65), respectively. For the LD-SoftK condition, the respective values were 0.36 (0.27, 0.44), 0.09 (0.05, 0.13) and 1.50 (1.50, 1.60). SD-SoftK lenses significantly improved 10VA compared with habitual and LD-SoftK. SD-SoftK also significantly improved CS compared with habitual, but not LD-SoftK. LD-SoftK significantly improved spherical aberration compared with uncorrected (0.03 ± 0.10 µ vs. 0.07 ± 0.13 µ) but not SD-SoftK (0.04 ± 0.07 µ). Both lenses required a mean of 1.5 modifications prior to final lens fitting. Fewer adverse events were seen with SD-SoftK (N = 3) compared with LD-SoftK (N = 8), and 75% of participants preferred SD-SoftK lenses. CONCLUSION: SD-SoftK lenses were preferred by 75% of subjects, were associated with fewer adverse events and significantly improved 10VA compared with LD-SoftK lenses. SD-SoftK lenses also significantly improved CS compared with the habitual correction, but this did not differ significantly from the LD-SoftK lenses.

Assessment of a Clinical Test for Detection of Alteration in Visual Perception Due to Astigmatism.

Purpose: Astigmatism blurs the retinal image of a circular spot along a particular orientation rendering it an elliptical shape. Astigmatic patients demonstrate adaptation to residual astigmatic blur that may affect their discrimination between oval and circular targets. The Wilkins Egg and Ball Test (WEBT) was created to detect altered visual perception due to residual astigmatic blur by discriminating a circle within a row of oval elements. This prospective, cross-sectional study examined the utility of WEBT in detecting uncorrected residual astigmatism on the perception of form symmetry in astigmatic and keratoconic participants as well as normal participants with induced astigmatism at four primary meridians. Methods: The mean search time (sT) and number of errors (noE) of 33 non-astigmatic controls (mean age: 24±5, range: 18-43, 6 males), 23 astigmatic participants (mean age: 36±12, range: 18-43, 6 males) and 13 keratoconic participants (N=22 eyes, mean age: 36±12, range: 18-58, 6 males) were measured under baseline, and 2.00 DC induced cylinder at four primary meridians, and for uncorrected, spherical-correction only, and fully corrected conditions, respectively. Mean sT and noE were converted to Z-scores, combined for each condition, and compared using repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc analysis. Results: Combined Z-scores for the controls were significantly worse (p<0.001) for all induced cylinder conditions. The induced 180° condition was significantly better than 45° and 90° conditions (p=0.04), but not the 135° condition. For both astigmatic and keratoconic cohorts, Z-scores of the uncorrected condition were significantly worse than the fully corrected condition (both p<0.01), but the fully corrected and spherical-only conditions did not differ significantly (p=0.06 and p=0.05, respectively). Conclusion: In accommodating young adults, WEBT detected altered visual perception due to overall blur, and moderate-high amounts of uncorrected induced astigmatism and keratoconus, but is not useful as a tool for detection of altered visual perception due to small residual astigmatic blur.