ABSTRACT
We interviewed six hundred adults to assess their awareness, attitude and misperceptions about cancer. The mean age (+/- SD) was 31.2 (+/- 8.7) years. Fifty-six percent of the participants were males and 75% were Saudis. Nationality and having a relative who had cancer were found to be insignificant predictors of attained knowledge. Despite a minor difference between males' and females' performance, gender did not influence knowledge. Education was the most significant factor that influenced individuals' knowledge and misperceptions. The most significant difference was noted between those who had university or higher education (level III, 41%) and those who were illiterate or only had primary schooling (level I, 16%). The difference between level I and level II (secondary and high school, 43%) was less obvious. The analysis also showed that individuals who were > 30 years of age generally showed more knowledge and fewer misconceptions about cancer than younger participants. Age, however, together with education deviated only 5% in the variability of the total score. A high level of misperception was observed among all respondents specifically relating to questions regarding side effects of conventional therapy and statements about unproven treatment. This analysis demonstrated that knowledge about cancer was disappointingly poor and the level of misperceptions significantly high. Possessing higher academic credentials alone, is not sufficient to acquire an optimal standard of health knowledge. The data also suggest that there should be comprehensive cancer health education and primary and secondary cancer prevention programs in Saudi Arabia. To achieve this goal, primary care physicians and community cancer centers should work jointly. Brief guidelines are proposed.
ABSTRACT
We interviewed 500 adult females without personal history of any type of cancer to assess their awareness and attitude toward various aspects of breast cancer. The mean age (SD) of participants was 31.6 (+/- 8.5) years with a range of 18 to 62 years. After control for level of education, age was not found to be a statistically significant factor that influenced participants' performance. Also not statistically significant was the history of having a relative who had cancer. Conversely, education was the only examined factor that correlated with interviewees' awareness and attitude. Individuals with university or higher education (level III) were more knowledgeable (statistically significant) than uneducated or those with only primary schooling (level I), or those participants who only had intermediate or high school education (level II). On the other hand, the responses of those individuals with education level I generally performed in a fashion similar to those at education level II. The general outcome of this exercise was that unacceptably high proportions of females at all education levels were either wrong or uncertain about some fundamental aspects of breast cancer etiology, risk factors, clinical features, detection methods, and management. Also shown was the relatively high percentages of those, particularly in education level I, who held misconceptions about unconventional management or the complications of conventional methods. We conclude that academic education alone is not enough to assure that recommended health behaviors will be adopted. For establishing cancer health education or cancer prevention and early detection programs, primary care physicians and community cancer centers should work jointly. Brief guidelines are proposed.
