Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Egypt Public Health Assoc ; 67(1-2): 87-108, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1295952

ABSTRACT

The present study used a well-tested patient satisfaction measuring instrument to identify the determinants of the level of overall satisfaction with hospital services, and to examine the level of satisfaction with attributes of 7 specific dimensions of hospital services. Using multiple regression analysis, it was found that out of 12 patient characteristics, age was the most important determinant of overall satisfaction, followed by gender. Perceived health status, clinical department, and expectations about the quality of services before admission were also significant but less important determinants of overall satisfaction. Marital status, level of education, nationality, and previous hospitalization in the study hospital, in Kuwait, or in a western country hospital, all had no significant effect on overall satisfaction. Concerning the effect of satisfaction with specific dimensions of hospital services on overall satisfaction, it was found that satisfaction with physicians was the most important determinant of overall satisfaction, followed by satisfaction with housekeeping and with nurses. Satisfaction with hospital environment and facilities and with admission process were also significant but less important determinants of overall satisfaction, while satisfaction with food and radiology services did not affect overall satisfaction. The level of overall satisfaction as well as satisfaction with specific dimensions of hospital services were quite high. Physicians' care was the most favorably rated dimension, followed by admission process and housekeeping, while nursing care was the least favorably rated dimension. Among the attributes of physicians' and nurses' care, technical care and courtesy were the most favorably rated items; while communication, particularly imparting of information, was the least favorably rated aspect. Several attributes of the hospital environment and facilities and of the food services were found to be dissatisfying to patients.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, General , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care , Adult , Female , Humans , Kuwait , Male , Middle Aged
2.
J Egypt Public Health Assoc ; 66(5-6): 693-722, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1797972

ABSTRACT

The present study was undertaken with the aim of developing and testing an instrument that could be used to measure patient satisfaction with hospital services in Kuwait. The instrument, which comprised 57 items, and measured satisfaction with 7 specific dimensions of hospital services, was administered to 493 patients using the interview technique. Statistical analysis showed that the instrument yields good response variability. Reliability of the instrument, measured in terms of the internal consistency coefficient alpha, exceeded the acceptable criterion level, the coefficients ranging between 0.73 and 0.86. Evidence of the construct validity of the instrument was found in significant positive correlation between the dimension specific satisfaction scale scores and scores for allegiance scale and for overall rating of quality of hospital services. Construct validity was further supported by convergent discriminant analysis, which showed that correlations between items of all 7 scales and their total scale scores were greater than correlations between scale items and the total scores of scales they do not represent. Analysis of an open-ended question about dissatisfying aspects of hospital services not included on the interview was undertaken to examine the instrument's content validity. Results indicated that patients identified 11 items, 8 of which were identified more than once, and 2 of which were not classifiable to the 7 dimensions assessed by the instrument. It was suggested to add the 8 items that were identified more than once, and to reassess the reliability and validity of the revised instrument. Assessment of the test-retest reliability, by comparing scale scores over time, was also suggested.


Subject(s)
Hospitals/standards , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Kuwait , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...