Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The most effective prophylaxis for colorectal cancer is endoscopic polypectomy. Prompted by the disadvantages of conventional colonoscopy (CC), we assessed the diagnostic ability of a promising alternative technique for detecting endoluminal masses: magnetic resonance colonography (MRC). METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients referred for CC underwent preliminary MRC. The diagnostic ability of this technique in detecting colonic endoluminal lesions was determined, compared with that of CC, and related to the findings from histologic examination. RESULTS: In detecting endoluminal lesions, MRC achieved a diagnostic accuracy similar to CC (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 93%; positive predictive value, 98%; and negative predictive value, 87.5%). CONCLUSIONS: MRC could be useful in screening programs of patients at high risk for colon cancer. Patients with MRC-detected endoluminal lesions must undergo CC for histologic diagnosis.

Local staging of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with histologic findings.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging with transrectal ultrasound in staging rectal carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with rectal carcinoma, histologically proven by endoscopic biopsy, were staged with both endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound and then underwent radical surgery. The preoperative staging was compared with histologic findings of the operative specimen according to TNM classification. RESULTS: Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging showed better results but was not statistically significantly different from transrectal ultrasound in evaluating T (accuracy, 84.6 vs. 76.9 percent): four overstaged and no understaged cases for the former and five overstaged cases and one understaged case for the latter. Both procedures showed similar results in evaluating N: 81 percent sensitivity and 66 percent specificity for endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and 72 percent sensitivity and 80 percent specificity for transrectal ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: An accurate locoregional staging of rectal cancer is essential for the planning of optimal therapy for rectal cancer. Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound showed similar results; the former is more expensive, whereas the latter is operator dependent. At present the use of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging seems to be justified only in selected low rectal cancers where transrectal ultrasound yielded doubtful results. However, a more extensive study is necessary to compare the advantages of these diagnostic techniques.

Prevention of postherniorrhaphy persistent pain: results of a prospective study.

Anterior tension-free and laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies represent one of the most common surgical procedure. Postherniorrhaphy persistent pain due to injures of inguinal regional nerves is rare, difficult to cure, often disabling and involving malpractice litigation. In a prospective study, we evaluated the effectiveness of neurectomy of the iliohypogastric nerve in prevention of postoperative persistent pain after anterior tension free herniorrhaphy. Between 1992-1995, we performed 180 anterior herniorraphies in 151 male patients. Iliohypogastric nerve was removed in all the herniorrhaphies. Polypropylene plug and sutured mesh were employed. Postoperative pain and clinical relevance of hypo-anesthesia and paresthesia were assessed. No patient complained of postoperative persistent pain. Hypo-anesthesia, never considered incapacitating, was present in 1% of patients after 2 years. We consider neurectomy of the iliohypogastric nerve a potentially useful surgical step in preventing postoperative persistent pain after anterior tension-free herniorrhaphy.