Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Food Chem ; 458: 140162, 2024 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943964

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the viability of juá pulp for fermentation by monoculture L. casei (Lc - 01) and L. acidophilus (La - 05) and co-culture (25 and 37 °C) for 72 h. Viable strain values (> 7 log CFU/g), pH reduction (below 3.7), fructose and glucose and increased of lactic acid showed that the pulp of juá served as a good matrix for fermentation. Catechin, epicatechin, epigallocatechin procyanidin B1, and gallic acid were the main phenolics that contributed to antioxidant activity. Fermentation by mono or co-culture increased or reduced the content of phenolics and antioxidant activity. Results showed that culture, time and temperature have effects in the fermentation of juá pulp. The co-cultivation of La - 05 + Lc - 01 contributed to improving the bioaccessibility of gallic acid (72.9%) of the jua pulp. Finding indicate juá pulp as a promising substrate to obtaining a new probiotic plant-based fermented beverage.

2.
Food Res Int ; 159: 111620, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35940811

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to assess Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus quadricauda, and Lagerheimia longiseta microalgae potential as protective agents for probiotic cultures [(Lactobacillus acidophilus (La-05) and Lacticaseibacillus casei (Lc-01)] during freeze-drying, refrigeration storage (4 °C, 120 days), and in vitro simulated gastrointestinal conditions (SGIC). The occurrence of membrane damage and ultrastructural aspects of the cells were also verified. Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) were used as a positive control and saline solution as a negative control. The effects of the cryoprotectants on probiotic survival depended on the tested probiotic culture and microalgae biomass. For La-05, all tested cryoprotectants caused a lower reduction in probiotic counts during the freeze-drying and up to 90 days of storage. S. platensis kept higher probiotic counts during storage, while C. vulgaris protected the probiotic against the SGIC. L. longiseta decreased the probiotic membrane damage, mainly due to the production of exopolysaccharides, which was observed in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For Lc-01, all tested cryoprotectants promoted a lower reduction in probiotic counts up to 120 days of storage. FOS and S. quadricauda protected the probiotics during freeze-drying and refrigeration storage, while C. vulgaris protected the probiotic against the SGIC and caused lower membrane damage, mainly due to physical protection observed in SEM. In conclusion, microalgae biomasses exerted similar or better cryoprotectant effects on probiotics than FOS, a recognized cryoprotective agent.


Subject(s)
Chlorella vulgaris , Lacticaseibacillus casei , Microalgae , Probiotics , Biomass , Cryoprotective Agents/pharmacology , Fresh Water , Lactobacillus acidophilus , Probiotics/chemistry
3.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; 62(18): 4929-4950, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33544001

ABSTRACT

Microalgae feasibility as food ingredients or source of nutrients and/or bioactive compounds and their health effects have been widely studied. This review aims to provide an overview of the use of microalgae biomass in food products, the technological effects of its incorporation, and their use as a source of health-promoting bioactive compounds. In addition, it presents the regulatory aspects of commercialization and consumption, and the main trends and market challenges Microalgae have stood out as sources of nutritional compounds (polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber) and biologically active compounds (asthaxanthin, ß-carotene, omega-3 fatty acids). The consumption of microalgae biomass proved to have several health effects, such as hypoglycemic activity, gastroprotective and anti-steatotic properties, improvements in neurobehavioral and cognitive dysfunction, and hypolipidemic properties. Its addition to food products can improve the nutritional value, aroma profile, and technological properties, with important alterations on the syneresis of yogurts, meltability in cheeses, overrun values and melting point in ice creams, physical properties and mechanical characteristics in crisps, and texture, cooking and color characteristics in pastas. However, more studies are needed to prove the health effects in humans, expand the market size, reduce the cost of production, and tighter constraints related to regulations.


Subject(s)
Microalgae , Humans , Microalgae/metabolism , Minerals/metabolism , Nutritive Value , Polysaccharides/metabolism , Vitamins/metabolism
4.
Food Funct ; 12(12): 5287-5300, 2021 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34009228

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ingestion of live (9 log CFU mL-1) and ultrasound-inactivated (paraprobiotic, 20 kHz, 40 min) Lacticaseibacillus casei 01 cells for 28 days on healthy parameters (biochemical and cardiovascular) and intestinal microbiota (amplicon sequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA) of rats fed a high-fat diet. Twenty-four male Wistar rats were divided into four groups of six animals: CTL (standard diet), HFD (high-fat diet), HFD-LC (high-fat diet and live L. casei), and HFD-ILC (high-fat diet and inactivated L. casei). The administration of live and ultrasound-inactivated L. casei prevented the increase (p < 0.05) in cholesterol levels (total and LDL) and controlled the insulin resistance in rats fed a high-fat diet. Furthermore, it promoted a modulation of the intestinal microbial composition by increasing (p < 0.05) beneficial bacteria (Lachnospiraceae and Ruminoccocaceae) and decreasing (p < 0.05) harmful bacteria (Clostridiaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Helicobacteriacea), attenuating the effects promoted by the HFD ingestion. Only live cells could increase (p < 0.05) the HDL-cholesterol, while only inactivated cells caused attenuation (p < 0.05) of the blood pressure. Results show beneficial effects of live and inactivated L. casei 01 and indicate that ultrasound inactivation produces a paraprobiotic with similar or improved health properties compared to live cells.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular System , Diet, High-Fat/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Lactobacillaceae/physiology , Lactobacillaceae/radiation effects , Ultrasonic Waves , Animals , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Body Weight , Eating , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Insulin Resistance , Intestines/microbiology , Male , Probiotics/pharmacology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Rats , Rats, Wistar
5.
Food Res Int ; 124: 109-117, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31466629

ABSTRACT

Tropical fruit and their industrial processing byproducts have been considered sources of probiotic Lactobacillus. Sixteen tropical fruit-derived Lactobacillus strains were assessed for growth-promoting effects using a host-commensal nutrient scarcity model with Drosophila melanogaster (Dm). Two Lactobacillus strains (L. plantarum 49 and L. plantarum 201) presenting the most significant effects (p ≤ .005) on Dm growth were selected and evaluated for their safety and beneficial effects in adult male Wistar rats during 28 days of administration of 9 log CFU/day, followed by 14 days of wash-out. Daily administration of L. plantarum 49 and L. plantarum 201 did not affect (p > .05) food intake or morphometric parameters. Both strains were associated with reduction (p ≤ .05) in blood glucose levels after 28 days of administration and after wash-out period; glucose levels remained reduced only in the group that received L. plantarum 49. Both strains were able to reduce (p ≤ .05) total cholesterol levels after 14 days of administration; after the wash-out period these levels remained reduced only in the group that received L. plantarum 201. L. plantarum 49 and L. plantarum 201 were detected in the intestine and did not cause alteration or translocate to spleen, kidneys or liver during the experimental or wash-out period. These results indicate that L. plantarum 49 and L. plantarum 201 present potential for use as probiotics with intrinsic abilities to modulate biochemical parameters of interest for the management of metabolic diseases.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/drug effects , Cholesterol/blood , Fruit/microbiology , Lactobacillus plantarum/physiology , Probiotics/pharmacology , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster , Feces/microbiology , Lactobacillus plantarum/isolation & purification , Liver/microbiology , Male , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Spleen/microbiology
6.
Food Res Int ; 108: 172-182, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735046

ABSTRACT

This study assessed the antagonistic activity of fruit-derived lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains against food-related bacteria and the effects of the highest organic acids LAB producers on the survival of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 in cheese and chicken meat, respectively. The production of organic acids by the Lactobacillus strains in the tested food matrices was also monitored. All tested LAB strains showed antagonistic activity in vitro on the growth of pathogenic or spoiling food-related bacteria, particularly on L. monocytogenes and/or S. Enteritidis PT4, through the action of non-proteinaceous substances. The highest amounts of acetic and lactic acid were detected in cell free culture supernatants of L. paracasei 108 and L. plantarum 201. In "Minas Frescal" cheese, L. plantarum 49 and L. paracasei 108 decreased the counts of L. monocytogenes, and L. plantarum 201 showed bacteriostatic effects on this pathogen over time. L. paracasei 108 decreased the counts of S. Enteritidis PT4 in ground chicken breast; L. plantarum 49 and L. plantarum 201 failed to decrease the counts of this pathogen. Decreases in counts of L. monocytogenes or S. Enteritidis in "Minas Frescal" cheese and ground chicken breast, respectively, were related with increases in lactic and acetic acid contents and decreases in pH values. L. plantarum 49 and L. paracasei 108 could be used as biopreservation tools in cheese and chicken breast meat, respectively.


Subject(s)
Cheese/microbiology , Food Microbiology/methods , Food Preservation/methods , Fruit/microbiology , Lactobacillus/physiology , Listeria monocytogenes/growth & development , Poultry Products/microbiology , Salmonella enteritidis/growth & development , Acetic Acid/metabolism , Lactic Acid/metabolism , Lactobacillus/isolation & purification , Lactobacillus/metabolism , Listeria monocytogenes/pathogenicity , Listeriosis/microbiology , Listeriosis/prevention & control , Microbial Viability , Salmonella Food Poisoning/microbiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Salmonella enteritidis/pathogenicity , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...