Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 16(6): 799-808, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11769830

ABSTRACT

The effects caused by the implantation of bioabsorbable hydroxyapatite (HA) bound to a pool of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and other bone noncollagenous hydrophobic proteins mixed with anorganic bovine bone inside rabbit bone marrow were assessed. Within the interior of hollow cylindric titanium prototypes, the following biomaterials were inserted: (1) test group: HA containing a pool of BMPs and noncollagenous hydrophobic proteins mixed with anorganic bovine bone; (2) control group: HA without any protein mixed with anorganic bovine bone; and (3) negative control group: blood clot. The cylinders were placed surgically into the medial portion of the tibiae of 7 rabbits in a manner that allowed the biomaterials to contact just the bone marrow. Morphometric analysis showed that: (1) the biomaterials containing the protein mixture resulted in significantly less new bone than the biomaterials without such a mixture; (2) the group without the protein pool formed larger amounts of bone within the cylinder when compared to the negative control (blood clot only); and (3) the biomaterials containing the protein pool did not show any difference in relation to the negative control. It was concluded that a pool of BMPs and other bone noncollagenous hydrophobic proteins had an inhibitory effect on osteogenesis, and that the biomaterials without a protein pool formed a favorable substrate to bone formation.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow/drug effects , Bone Matrix/transplantation , Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/adverse effects , Durapatite/pharmacology , Osteogenesis/drug effects , Animals , Cattle , Cell Adhesion , Extracellular Matrix Proteins/pharmacology , Male , Models, Animal , Rabbits , Tibia
2.
Pesqui Odontol Bras ; 15(4): 296-301, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11787317

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of plaque control performed with electric and manual toothbrushes. Fifteen children with primary dentition and 14 children with mixed dentition were divided in two groups and randomly assigned to utilize a manual or an electric toothbrush. In the first session, professional plaque removal was performed, and the children spent 24 hours without brushing their teeth. In the second session, plaque was disclosed and assessed on all facial and lingual surfaces. After that, all children brushed their teeth with the predetermined toothbrush. The next procedure was the disclosure and measurement of residual plaque. After a period of 7 days, the children switched the kind of toothbrush, and the same procedures were repeated. According to the statistical analysis of the results, there were no significant differences concerning plaque removal when the toothbrushes were utilized by children with mixed dentition. On the other hand, the electric toothbrush promoted significantly greater plaque removal on the lingual surfaces of teeth from children with primary dentition.


Subject(s)
Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Toothbrushing/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Over Studies , Dentition, Mixed , Female , Humans , Male , Single-Blind Method , Tooth, Deciduous , Toothbrushing/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...