Evaluation of the leishmanicidal and cytotoxic effects of inhibitors for microorganism metabolic pathway enzymes.

Chemotherapy for leishmaniosis a neglected parasitic disease, is based on few drugs, which are toxic and present resistance issues. Efforts for the development of new therapies are essential for the control of leishmaniasis. Metabolic pathway enzymes are promising targets for new drugs against parasites. The search for effective drugs against key enzymes can take advantage of the similarities between metabolic pathways in different microorganisms trypanosomatids Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania and fungus Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this report, leishmanicidal activity of the metabolic pathway enzymes inhibitors (IDs) of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and cruzain-cysteine protease from T. cruzi and scitalona-desidratase, adenosine deaminase, succinate dehydrogenase complex II and hydroxynaphthalene reductase from S. cerevisiae was performed on Leishmania amazonensis extracellular promastigotes and amastigotes within macrophages. The most promising compound, ID195, which is a DHODH inhibitor was toxic against promastigotes and was selective for amastigotes over host cells.

Pharmacophore modeling for anti-Chagas drug design using the fragment molecular orbital method.

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease, caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is a neglected tropical disease that causes severe human health problems. To develop a new chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of Chagas disease, we predicted a pharmacophore model for T. cruzi dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (TcDHODH) by fragment molecular orbital (FMO) calculation for orotate, oxonate, and 43 orotate derivatives. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Intermolecular interactions in the complexes of TcDHODH with orotate, oxonate, and 43 orotate derivatives were analyzed by FMO calculation at the MP2/6-31G level. The results indicated that the orotate moiety, which is the base fragment of these compounds, interacts with the Lys43, Asn67, and Asn194 residues of TcDHODH and the cofactor flavin mononucleotide (FMN), whereas functional groups introduced at the orotate 5-position strongly interact with the Lys214 residue. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: FMO-based interaction energy analyses revealed a pharmacophore model for TcDHODH inhibitor. Hydrogen bond acceptor pharmacophores correspond to Lys43 and Lys214, hydrogen bond donor and acceptor pharmacophores correspond to Asn67 and Asn194, and the aromatic ring pharmacophore corresponds to FMN, which shows important characteristics of compounds that inhibit TcDHODH. In addition, the Lys214 residue is not conserved between TcDHODH and human DHODH. Our analysis suggests that these orotate derivatives should preferentially bind to TcDHODH, increasing their selectivity. Our results obtained by pharmacophore modeling provides insight into the structural requirements for the design of TcDHODH inhibitors and their development as new anti-Chagas drugs.