Impact of an Operating Room Nurse Preoperative Dialogue on Anxiety, Satisfaction and Early Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Visceral Surgery-A Single Center, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Anxiety is common before surgery and known to negatively impact recovery from surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a preoperative nurse dialogue on a patient's anxiety, satisfaction and early postoperative outcomes. Method: This 1:1 randomized controlled trial compared patients undergoing major visceral surgery after a semistructured preoperative nurse dialogue (interventional group: IG) to a control group (CG) without nursing intervention prior to surgery. Anxiety was measured with the autoevaluation scale State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, Y-form) pre and postoperatively. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) In-Patsat32 questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction at discharge. Further outcomes included postoperative pain (visual analogue scale: VAS 0−10), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), opiate consumption and length of stay (LOS). Results: Over a period of 6 months, 35 participants were randomized to either group with no drop-out or loss to follow-up (total n = 70). The median score of preoperative anxiety was 40 (IQR 33−55) in the IG vs. 61 (IQR 52−68) in the CG (p < 0.001). Postoperative anxiety levels were comparable 34 (IQR 25−46) vs. 32 (IQR 25−44) for IG and CG, respectively (p = 0.579). The IG did not present higher overall satisfaction (90 ± 15 vs. 82.9 ± 16, p = 0.057), and pain at Day 2 was similar (1.3 ± 1.7 vs. 2 ± 1.9, p = 0.077), while opiate consumption, PONV levels and LOS were comparable. Conclusion: A preoperative dialogue with a patient-centered approach helped to reduce preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing major visceral surgery.

Impacts of Touch massage on the experience of patients with chronic pain: A protocol for a mixed method study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a major public health problem. It affects the quality of life of many patients and their families and compromises physical and social functioning and psychological well-being. Non-pharmacological interventions are increasingly being used as a complement to chronic pain care. One of these interventions is Touch massage (TM) that can provide relaxation, comfort and well-being. In addition to its various physiological functions, TM can be used as a social communication tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cluster study with an exploratory qualitative part. Two groups will be considered: the experimental group will benefit from a TM delivered by trained members of care team and the control group will benefit from an intervention of the same duration with a foot massage device. At least 4 sessions will be delivered and spread over two weeks. Sample size calculation showed that 78 participants (39 per group) need to be included. As for the qualitative part, semi-structured interviews will be conducted to investigate the patients' perception of the intervention; focus groups will explore the satisfaction and general perception of the health care teams. EXPECTED RESULTS: Incorporating TM interventions into care planning could bring benefits in supporting patients suffering from chronic pain. TM is expected to increase the patients' feelings that their pain is seriously considered; physical and psychological support should help improve their sense of comfort and well-being and hence their quality of life. This practice might thus improve the caregiver-patient relationship with TM as a providing a new means of establishing communication through touch. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04295603, Registered on March 4, 2020.

[Complexity in nursing practice : Toward a new conceptual framework in nursing care] / La complexité dans la pratique infirmière : vers un nouveau cadre conceptuel dans les soins infirmiers.

While complexity theory has gradually influenced the field of health and social sciences, it has also had an impact on nursing care by introducing a wealth of terminology into the field. The terms "complex patient," "complex case," "complex care," "complex practice," and "complex needs" have been proposed to describe different aspects of complexity in nursing care. As these qualifiers reflect, nurses become actors in multidefined care and must integrate complexity into their reflective practice. By way of a narrative literature review, this article aims to offer a new perspective on nursing by explaining the different terms used in the discipline, using a multi-level approach. At the end of this review, the authors propose a new integrative conceptual framework for complexity in nursing practice.

La complexité dans la pratique infirmière : vers un nouveau cadre conceptuel dans les soins infirmiers.

While complexity theory has gradually influenced the field of health and social sciences, it has also had an impact on nursing care by introducing a wealth of terminology into the field. The terms "complex patient," "complex case," "complex care," "complex practice," and "complex needs" have been proposed to describe different aspects of complexity in nursing care. As these qualifiers reflect, nurses become actors in multidefined care and must integrate complexity into their reflective practice. By way of a narrative literature review, this article aims to offer a new perspective on nursing by explaining the different terms used in the discipline, using a multi-level approach. At the end of this review, the authors propose a new integrative conceptual framework for complexity in nursing practice.

Caring Models in Geriatric Rehabilitation: An Integrative Review.

To promote excellence in care, person centered care based on humanistic values are essential. This integrative literature review summarizes the current research on the use of a caring model or approach in rehabilitation wards for elderly and explores the issues or benefits on patient's care or on patient-nurse interactions.

Revie ⊕: An intervention promoting the dignity of individuals with advanced cancer: A feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The dignity of patients is a major concern among health professionals engaged in the care of individuals with advanced cancer. Although several dignity promoting interventions have been developed, none of them have focused on a positive, resource-based approach. The aim of our study, entitled Revie ⊕, was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theory-guided life-review intervention, focusing on strength and resources, for patients with advanced cancer and for nurses delivering the intervention. METHOD: Our 2015-2016 study was conducted with patients with advanced cancer in an ambulatory and an inpatient setting of a Swiss university hospital. An embedded concurrent mixed method design was used. The feasibility and acceptability of Revie ⊕ was explored, as were changes in the sense of dignity, posttraumatic growth, and satisfaction with life. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients received the intervention. The level of attrition was low (26%). Administering the Revie ⊕ intervention proved to be feasible. Participants (patients and nurses) considered the intervention helpful with a high level of satisfaction. A merged data analysis highlighted the need to address the patients' existential concerns. The majority of the participants found that the intervention helped them, and they recommend it for other patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the Revie ⊕ intervention, which focuses on a resource-based approach, was perceived favorably by all of the participants. A change in the nurse-patient relationship was noted and it was deemed to be beneficial.

Revie ⊕: the influence of a life review intervention including a positive, patient-centered approach towards enhancing the personal dignity of patients with advanced cancer-a study protocol for a feasibility study using a mixed method investigation.

BACKGROUND: It is generally recognized that existential concerns must be addressed to promote the dignity of patients with advanced cancer. A number of interventions have been developed in this regard, such as dignity therapy and other life review interventions (LRI). However, so far, none have focused on a positive approach or evaluated its effects on dignity and personal growth. This study aims to explore the feasibility of Revie ⊕, a life review intervention comprising a positive, patient-centered approach, and to determine potential changes of patients' sense of dignity, posttraumatic growth, and satisfaction with life. METHODS: A mixed method study will be performed, which includes specialized nurses and 40 patients with advanced cancer in an ambulatory and in-patient setting of a Swiss university hospital. Quantitative methods involve a single group, pre- and post-intervention, and outcome measurements include the Patient Dignity Inventory, the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Feasibility data relating to process, resource, and scientific elements of the trial will also be collected. A semi-directed interview will be used to collect qualitative data about the process and the participants' experiences of the intervention. In this way, enhanced quantitative-qualitative evidence can be drawn from outcome measures as well as individual, contextualized personal views, to help inform researchers about the plausibility of this complex intervention before testing its effectiveness in a subsequent full trial. DISCUSSION: Patient dignity is a goal of quality end-of-life care. To our knowledge, this is the first trial to evaluate the role of a life review intervention that is focused on personal growth and on changes relating to the experience of having cancer. This study will evaluate the feasibility of a novel intervention, Revie ⊕, which we hope will contribute to promote the dignity, personal growth, and overall life satisfaction of patients with advanced cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN12497093.

[The acceptability of the intervention Revie ⊕ : the nurses' perceptions and experiences] / L'acceptabilité de l'intervention Revie ⊕ : perception et vécu des infirmières

Persons with advanced cancer experience high levels of existential distress due to being confronted with their mortality, which leads to feelings of lack of sense, or discouragement. It is important to develop interventions to relieve existential distress to promote the dignity of persons with advanced cancer in order to help them live this difficult experience in the best possible way. A new intervention, called Revie ⊕ and conducted by nurses, was developed. A feasibility study was conducted with 41 patients with advanced cancer in the ambulatory and hospital sector of a university hospital in Switzerland to determine the acceptability of Revie ⊕. The purpose of this article is to present the intervention's acceptability from the perspective of the nurses. Nurses conducting the intervention were asked to complete a questionnaire, maintain personal notes, and to participate in one focus group. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the questionnaire. Thematic analysis was applied to analyze the nurses' personal notes and focus group data. Results indicate that nurses consider Revie ⊕ to be a beneficial intervention for the patients and also for their professional posture. As a consequence, the nurses wish for its implementation into practice. Recommendations are proposed to promote further implementation.